Your superior demands faster delivery in software design. How will you balance performance and compromise?

Balancing performance and compromise in software design is crucial for meeting deadlines while maintaining quality. Some approaches we can take are: Iterative Development: Use short development cycles (sprints) to deliver incremental improvements. Adaptability: Be open to changes based on feedback and evolving requirements. Collaboration: Regularly involve stakeholders (product owners, developers, testers) to align goals.

Leveraging automation tools plays a pivotal role in maintaining both pace and quality in software delivery processes. Automation helps streamline repetitive tasks such as testing, integration, and deployment, reducing manual errors while accelerating delivery timelines.

I'm a fan of the iterative approach and found this to be very powerful when combined with a stakeholder that is not risk adverse. And prioritizes getting the deliverable out into the users/focus group hands for feedback and adjustments as fast as possible. Fail Fast.

You can use weighted techniques that use priority and complexity as x and y, and prioritize backlog not taking too hard to achieve or too non-important items in a first queue.

Balancing performance and compromise in software design is crucial for meeting deadlines while maintaining quality. Some aspects we can consider for prioritize features are: MoSCoW Method: Categorize features as Must-have, Should-have, Could-have, or Won’t-have. Value vs. Effort: Prioritize high-value, low-effort features first. User Stories: Break down features into user stories for better estimation and planning.

Diante de prazos apertados, é crucial priorizar recursos e funcionalidades. Identifique os elementos essenciais que agregam mais valor ao usuário e foque neles primeiro. Usando metodologias como MoSCoW (Must have, Should have, Could have, Won't have), você pode gerenciar o escopo eficientemente, fazendo com que o núcleo do projeto seja entregue dentro do prazo, sem comprometer a qualidade, com o foco inicial sempre no MVP.

1.Based on the available capacity of the team, the prioritized requirements should be scaled down as much as possible. 2. End to end working functionalities can be developed, tested and delivered faster through iterations or sprints

Automatizar processos pode acelerar o desenvolvimento sem comprometer a qualidade. Implemente pipelines de CI/CD para automatizar a integra??o e entrega de código. Utilize ferramentas como Jenkins, GitHub Actions ou GitLab CI para configurar esses pipelines. Automatize testes unitários e de integra??o usando frameworks como JUnit, PyTest ou Selenium. Use scripts de automa??o para tarefas repetitivas, como deploys e backups. Adotar a automa??o n?o só acelera o desenvolvimento, mas também reduz erros, garantindo um produto final mais confiável.

Balancing performance and compromise in software design is crucial for meeting deadlines while maintaining quality. Some aspects we can consider for managing expectations are : Transparency: Clearly communicate project status, risks, and trade-offs. Set Realistic Goals: Educate stakeholders about development timelines and constraints. Under promise, Overdeliver: Avoid overcommitting; surprise stakeholders with early deliveries.

Managing expectations about software is crucial because it aligns stakeholder understanding with the capabilities and limitations of the product, reducing the risk of disappointment and dissatisfaction. When expectations are set realistically, development teams can focus on delivering high-quality features without the pressure of unattainable goals, which fosters sustainable performance. Additionally, clear communication about what can and cannot be achieved helps stakeholders make informed decisions about compromises, ensuring that essential functionalities are prioritized. Ultimately, this balanced approach leads to a more reliable product, enhancing user satisfaction and fostering long-term success.

Transparency is the only way of fast delivery, the earlier you see something went wrong - the earlier you can re-operate on your activities. The check-list for transparency is very simple but not easy achievable 1. At any moment of time you should clearly see what are the current team acitvities 2. Demos should be performed for all features on the earliest possible stage 3. Consistent test execution together with regular SAST and DAST should allow to assess the code quality on any moment of time 4. Developers should speak between each others without help of manager

Apart of the retrospective provided by the team you should not forget about self-assessment and continuous analysis where you were able to make it better as a technical leader. Sometimes team cannot see or feel the full picture. For that you should have a habit of thinking out of the box and look wider