Your mobile testing team is at odds over strategies. How will you navigate conflicting approaches?

I'd first seek to understand the root causes of the conflict through individual discussions, uncovering the differing philosophies, tool preferences, or personal dynamics at play. Then, I'd facilitate an open team discussion, emphasizing active listening to ensure everyone feels heard. We'd then evaluate each strategy, listing pros and cons against objective criteria like test coverage and efficiency. Ideally, we'd use data or small experiments to guide our decision. We'll aim for a hybrid approach combining the best aspects of each strategy. If not, we'll prioritize based on project needs and risks, with a defined trial period and a re-evaluation plan.

To navigate conflicting approaches in a mobile testing team, I would first facilitate a structured discussion to allow each member to present their strategies, highlighting strengths and risks. This encourages collaboration and helps find common ground. Next, I’d focus on data-driven decision-making by testing the strategies on a small scale. This empirical approach allows us to objectively determine the best fit for the project while integrating key elements from each method, fostering continuous improvement and shared ownership.

Different Types of Effective Mobile App Testing Strategies Cross-platform testing. ... Functionality testing. ... UI and UX testing. ... Testing across different screen dimensions and specifications. ... Battery testing. ... Regression testing after each update.

en mi experiencia, es necesario validar todos los caminos y unificar o emplear una sola metodología, herramienta y las prioridades, en dos escenarios, el cliente detalla sus necesidades para el servicio que desea ofrecer, iniciando desde cero o trabajar sobre un servicio ya creado y sin soporte.

Em meu trabalho como profissional de controle de qualidade em testes de aplicativos móveis, enfrentei um impasse na equipe sobre a estratégia a adotar: alguns preferiam testes exploratórios, enquanto outros defendiam uma abordagem estruturada. Para resolver o conflito, promovi discuss?es abertas e propus uma solu??o híbrida, combinando testes exploratórios iniciais com o desenvolvimento de scripts detalhados. Essa abordagem mista permitiu a rápida identifica??o de defeitos críticos e a cria??o de uma base sólida para testes futuros, resultando em um processo de testes mais eficiente e robusto.

A great way to open dialogue is to look at what industry best practices are. They may have a different perspective on how to test that you may not be used to, however, it may yield better results. If you use industry standard best practices as a baseline & then figure out what works and what doesn’t between the two methodologies you might end up establishing a new procedure, that benefits everyone.

To ensure comprehensive testing, combine automatic and manual testing strategies. Automate repetitive tasks, unit tests, and UI interactions using tools like Appium, Selenium, or JUnit, to cover a wide range of scenarios efficiently. Meanwhile, utilize manual testing for complex, dynamic, or hard-to-automate scenarios, such as exploratory testing, user experience testing, and edge case testing. By leveraging the strengths of both approaches, you'll achieve thorough testing coverage, reduce testing time, and increase the overall quality of your mobile application.