You need to upgrade your VR headset for professional use. What are your options?

This are some options to upgrade a VR headset for a heightened professional experience. Oculus Quest 2: Intrigued by its versatility and quality. HTC Vive Pro: Solid choice for advanced applications with superior performance. Valve Index: Cutting-edge technology for an immersive experience in [your specialization]. Oculus Quest 3: Keeping an eye on the latest for potential advancements.

my Master degree thesis was about the employment of VR goggles in instruction purposes, the quality and resoultion takes the immersive experience to a whole new level that makes other parameters unworthy. Resoultion facilitates ergonomics and totally eases the device use. At the same time, the audio quality will not cover the need for higher resolution as the user dives into the immersion of the VR

When it comes to business / professional use, money is often not as much of an constraint as with consumer focused use. Check out high-end VR devices, such as Pimax, to get the most out of resolution and field of view. But remember you'll also need a powerful machine tethered to the headset to do the rendering and heavy lifting. That being said, even consumer grade devices such as Meta Quest 3 and Pico 4 are great options for professional and business use!

Some of my options to consider upgrading VR headset Bigscreen VR for personal use (it is custom fit to a scan of your face, and you need vive trackers) Vive XR Elite or Quest Pro for tradeshows and for anything else Quest 3 hands-down best value for money right now also, if you can still catch a Varjo Aero at $1000usd+vive trackers...

At the moment the b2b VR headsets that we recommend, depending on the clients needs (mobility and budgets) are: 1. PC powered options - Valve Index, HTC Vive Pro, HTC Vive 2. Stand alone: Pico, Quest 2 There are many factors to take into consideration, like who is the end user and what experience they have with such tech, what content will be played and will it be developed especially for that headset? Will the client need to rent the equipment or buy it? Where will it be used, by whom and how often? How is the area in which the equipment will be used? Outdoors, sunlight, hot temperature? All of these factors contribute to the correct choosing of the adequate VR headset.

The most important aspect of comfort is reducing the front-heaviness on headsets. The total weight of the headset makes much less difference that the weight perceived due to torque, therefore the less the headset juts out from one's face, the more comfortable it will be. For most headsets there are add-ons sold by third parties, and for comfort often the most important ones are straps, with battery straps being a good option for improving weight distribution whilst increasing the life of the headset. There are two types of straps: halo and head clasping. Preference is extremely personal. Another add-on is third party face covers. Pleather is a good option for cleanable + confortable. These can increase FOV a little if thin enough.

Here is my personal ranking when it comes to comfort 1. Pico 4 - The Pico 4 is to-date the most comfortable headset I've put my head in and it just sits perfectly with very little perceived weight on your face 2. Meta Quest 2/3 - are also great if you upgrade their default head strap to the pro version that distributes the weight better. Meta Quest 3 is definitely much better than 2 even with the default headband. 3. Meta Quest Pro - weight is balanced but still the device feels quite heavy on your head.

I've given over 40 VR tours in the last month using VIVE focus 3 to visitors from age 8 to 70+. Ability to accomodate glasses (and not squash the face), easily accessible controls for volume and IPD, and non-velcro straps are a must. Light-weight, solutions (wireless if possible) and inside out tracking are a necessity. People new to the technology quickly become overwhelmed with sensors and controllers.

El principal punto de confort viene dado por lograr un equilibrio de pesos con el frontal del HMD. Las correas semirrígidas con ajuste en el occipital son una excelente opción. Bajo mi punto de vista son imprescindibles para llevar a cabo sesiones con exergames. Si además conseguimos una con batería adicional lograremos más horas de autonomía.

Upgrading to a professional VR headset involves prioritizing comfort and ergonomics. Options like the Oculus Quest 2, HTC Vive Cosmos, and Samsung Odyssey+ offer light, adjustable designs with breathable materials and intuitive controls, ensuring prolonged use without discomfort. These headsets are ideal for professionals seeking an optimal balance of functionality and comfort in virtual reality environments.

External tracking sensors are really not needed at this point for most scenarios. Modern VR headsets are capable of tracking your hands, face, eyes and even your body without external sensors. For some very advanced and high fidelity scenarios, you might still want to use additional trackers in your environment.

On upgrading VR Headset I would prefer a VR Headset with few things: 1. Should not much bulky and it should have at least tracking and RGB camera. ( it would help on perception) 2. HMD Resolution and brightness. 3. Display FOV (Horizontal and vertical) 4. Refresh rate : 60Hz(min) 5. If it’s completely wired then it should have at least a fake battery. 6. Hand tracking / gestures/ voice commands ( at least for some native task) 7. Handy Controllers. With useful and proper placed switches. 8. Lens adjustment should be proper and if we can adjust focal and lens power it would be great for the specs person. 9. In any kind of motion Artefacts should not be there on UX. 10.It should Support all type of game engine content.

Tracking with the standalone devices is good however fails in some cases where the controller needs to take off the front of the headset. Meta Quest 3 has almost resolved this issue and hence the best in class. Hand tracking - Quest 3 is really good and what is best is their colour transition immediately user goes outside the boundary. Tracking to different objects other than the controller is good with HTC Vive. Meta Quest 3 or any standalone has this issue. With the new base station 2.0 and tracker 3.0 HTC has really good experience in terms of tracking. Controllers ergonomically Quest 3 and PICO are good while HTC and MS-based HP Reverb or Odessey are not good.

Oculus Rift S:Utilizes inside-out tracking,eliminating the need for external sensors.Offers accurate and responsive tracking of head and body movements.Ergonomic design for comfortable and intuitive use.Features buttons,triggers,and joysticks for versatile interactions.Well-suited for professionals requiring precise tracking in various applications.HTC Vive Pro:Utilizes external sensors for room-scale tracking,providing high accuracy. Offers reliable tracking of both head and body movements.Ergonomic controllers with a range of buttons and features.Suitable for professional applications with diverse interaction needs.Ideal for professionals in fields such as architecture or engineering,where precise tracking is essential.

1. The HTC Vive Pro prided itself on precise tracking, boasting about molding virtual worlds with bare hands. 2.The Oculus Rift S, known for its friendly demeanor, welcomed users with inside-out tracking and a clutter-free design. 3.The Valve Index, eccentric and inventive, teased about fingers pointing back in its sensor-laden gaze. In the realm of AEC!

Opinions will definitely vary here. Personally I think having a VR headset on your head is already a discomfort factor for many people, now wearing an additional headset for audio/microphone makes things even worse. Modern devices have good enough speakers and microphone built into the device itself so I really don't see a reason to not use them for most people. Unless privacy is a concern.

The audio certainly has the greatest potential to contribute even more to the immersion with the view, as a lot is already being done with 3D audio/binaural techniques. Playback via more modern "headphones" could be improved here.

Oculus Quest 2:Immersive and realistic audio system.Provides spatial sound for an enhanced VR experience.Clear and crisp microphone with noise-canceling capabilities.Facilitates distortion-free communication with other users or apps.High-quality audio system contributing to an immersive environment.Offers spatial sound for a realistic VR auditory experience.Clear and noise-canceling microphone for distortion-free communication. Well-suited for professional applications that require clear voice communication.HP Reverb G2:Provides immersive,high-quality sound.Spatial audio for a realistic VR auditory experience.Clear and noise-canceling microphone for effective communication.Ideal for professional users engaging in collaborative VR projects.

Im gewerblichen Kontext ist es wichtig, dass ein VR-Headset nicht nur eine hohe Qualit?t in Bezug auf Audio und Mikrofon hat, sondern auch eine zuverl?ssige Leistung und Kompatibilit?t mit vorhandenen Systemen bietet. Darüber hinaus kann die Art der verwendeten Technologie einen Unterschied machen. Beispielsweise bietet ein fortschrittliches, halbprofessionelles VR-Headset wie das "Valve Index" scharfe visuelle Ergebnisse und ist mit SteamVR kompatibel. Es hat auch seinen eigenen VR-Software-Store in Form von Viveport, der ein Abonnement-basierter Service bietet, der unbegrenzten Zugang zu VR-Erfahrungen erm?glicht.

1. Oculus Quest 2: Built-in speakers and microphone for immersive audio experiences in AEC simulations and design reviews. 2. Valve Index: High-fidelity speakers and integrated microphone provide exceptional audio quality, ideal for collaborative design discussions. 3. Sony PlayStation VR: Integrated 3D audio technology and built-in microphone enhance realism in virtual environments for AEC interactions.

Regarding compatibility and connectivity, the Oculus Quest 2 is an excellent choice. Its seamless integration with the PC is remarkable; connecting it feels like a natural extension of your system. The Quest 2 adapts effortlessly to various PC hardware configurations, ensuring smooth usability.

Current VR headsets splits in two categories regarding the core technology : - powered by a workstation (HTC, Pico) - powered by an embedded Android system (Quest2 & 3). The latter can also be powered by a workstation (with Link wire or AirLink technology), but to be used wireless the app has to be optimized away. This is also a crucial choice to make when in comes to ergonomy, as workstation-based VR headset use a wire, or a set of wires to run the app. VR headsets also split in two core features depending if they allow camera pass-trough (Quest2 and Quest3, Linx, amongst other) and allow AR experiences as well.

Selecting the ideal VR headset for AEC is akin to finding the perfect dance partner. Picture one that moves seamlessly with your preferred software like Autodesk Revit or SketchUp and effortlessly syncs with platforms such as SteamVR or Oculus. You'll want connectivity smoother than a well-buttered biscuit, so opt for options like USB, HDMI, or wireless connectivity. As for reliability, seek a headset as dependable as your favorite joke. Consider the HTC Vive Pro, Oculus Rift S, or Valve Index—they're like the suave dancers of the VR world, making your AEC experience a delightful ballroom affair.

I have both wireless and wired headsets (Virtuell Desktop). The cable is a bit annoying, but I still notice the difference at work. And there has to be somewhere to get the power for longer working days. Cable is fine for me now but i am looking forward to decisive developments

In my experience, this one is the most important… In case of Oculus, when we are talking about connectivity is really messed up and you take tons of time trying to connect the headset to the computer. Hear me out, getting a good connection will save you a lot of time and you will be free from future headaches

I have been working on the Meta Quest 2 for 6-7 months now, and I have found that it is a lot more comfortable than the PSVR headset. If you don’t require colored passthrough, then the Quest 2 is worth trying.

With the Quest 3 out, buying used Quest 2's could be a good idea if you need to buy multiple high quality VR headsets. The only thing to note is the Quest 2 has grainy and black-and-white camera which aren't great for mixed reality.

For freelance developers or indie studios, market assessment is crucial before investing in a VR device. If the device costs $300, ensure potential earnings surpass this, aiming for at least $2000. When exploring options, research and watch YouTube reviews. Borrowing the device can minimize risk for informed decisions tailored to your needs. For explorers, research and reviews are key. Understand the device's features and performance for a well-informed decision, ensuring it aligns with your interests. Personally, I wait a month before any purchase or investment. This allows thorough evaluation of necessity, research, comparison, and alignment with budget. This deliberate approach prevents impulsive decisions for a satisfying outcome.

Price point with the latest headsets is a huge issue. We've seen the devices jump by a few hundred dollars and immediately I'm unable to market these on grant funded projects for schools (typically in the range of 50k or less). Only on much larger scale grants can I afford the headsets.

Value depends on your exact use case. For high end simulations the Varjo XR-4 has amazing value, with only the Pimax Crystal coming close. On the other hand if you just want (standalone) VR, with the potential to use hand tracking, the Meta Quest 3 or discounted Quest 2 are a great deal. Especially with the rise of 'spatial computing', known to Mixed Reality to most, the Quest 3 is definitely the best value because of it's scene meshing features!

First, you'll need to figure out why you want to upgrade your headset. I give a few reasons and share some advice: - If you are spending more time in the headset you are better off purchasing a better strap, facial interface, or accessory to improve comfort - If you want to bring it into your company look at headsets that are enterprise-friendly, HTC, Pico or Varjo might be the better option - If you feel the computing power is limiting you should invest in a PC first. - If you want the shiniest and latest headset on the market just get a Vision Pro ??

To truly enhance your immersive experience, consider investing in full body haptic solutions offered by companies such as B haptics and HaptX. These cutting-edge technologies not only amplify the sensation of your physical body interacting with virtual environments, but also bring a heightened sense of realism and inclusion to your overall virtual experience !

You will need to prioritize your reasons for purchasing your headset. Overall, the price, resolution, and ergonomics are important considerations when choosing a headset. Most important of all, Mixed Reality apps are here to stay, so having a headset capable of handling high-quality mixed reality apps as well as a passthrough that provides sharp and colorful visuals is essential. Oculus Quest 3 is a perfect choice and comes with an amazing price!

From my experience with VR applications from my industry, having strong hardware and software support/integrations with SPECIFIC use cases in mind would overall improve adoption. -Cost in both price per unit and setup/training time would be factors to consider for deployment -Lack of variety in hardware solutions limits functionality in new situations or cost of custom solutions limit deployment Overall, if these hurdles could be overcome, VR has serious applications in construction and many more industries.

Agreeing with Gabrielle on thinking of the "why" you want to upgrade your headset. To learn how to develop for it is a valid reason. If you are just upgrading for the sake of upgrading, or because of cosmetic reasons, it may not be worth the upgrade. Does the software you ship require the most ultra-graphic settings? If it's a serious game that deals with sensitive topics, often people prefer the less realistic graphics to help create a barrier of separation from the experience. If it's an entertainment game but uses a low-poly style, with optimised assets for a lower quality kit, it may be unnecessarily expensive to upgrade for minimal gain. Consider the adoption rate for the new tech, is it worth the investment for you to upgrade?