When should you launch your MVP?

Launching a MVP provides significant benefits: 1. Reduced Costs and Time: Focus on core features to save development time and expenses. 2. Market Validation: Test the market demand for your product quickly and efficiently. 3. Attract Investors: Demonstrate your product's potential and traction to potential investors. 4. Flexibility for Iteration: Easily adapt and make changes based on initial user response. 5. Risk Mitigation: Lower the risk of product failure by validating concepts early in the development process. 6. Early User Feedback: Gain insights from early adopters to refine your product.

Launching your MVP as soon as possible offers invaluable insights. It puts your idea into real-world practice, revealing both anticipated and unexpected technical and viability challenges. Early customer feedback is a goldmine, providing direct insights into market needs, product strengths, and areas for improvement. This early launch also establishes key metrics that form the foundation of your startup. These metrics are crucial for plotting sustainable growth and attracting investors. Essentially, an early MVP launch accelerates the learning curve, positioning your startup for informed and agile development.

You should launch your MVP right now. If you aren't deathly embarrassed about it when you launch, it means you've launched too late. Speed > everything. Even if you launch a totally mediocre product then iterate from there, any data you get from that initial launch is more valuable than if you waited. There are always exceptions, like if you want to raise VC and having a somewhat polished product to show is good but even then, that really just depends on where you are. If you're in Europe good luck raising without being a B2B sass making 20K/MRR and then at that point why even raise? Speed > Everything.

MVP should be minimalistic and showcase your idea in the most rudimentary way. The goal is to find Product Market Fit. So, launch the MVP as soon as possible, even if it is somewhat broken. The benefit of MVP is quickly identifying if you are progressing in the right direction, getting feedback, and iterating.

When should you launch your MVP? Asap. Go out and test with the very first 5-10 clients. That's jumping from a Power Point to reality which is 100x effective than building your "ideal product". It's guaranteed that you haven't considered some pain points of your ICP :)

Some founders fear doing MVP and mostly say what if they steal our ideas? A founder who is paranoid about stealing their startup idea will never create a successful one, that’s for sure. Ideas are worthless. Execution is key. Everyone can copy you any time they want.

Worrying about copycats is an innovation anti-pattern. It is much more important to validate your value proposition and build a user base. Instead of fearing imitation, focus on building a competitive moat (IP, network effects, data, brand) around your product.

People fear that putting an MVP out for display can hurt reputation and business, and this can stand true if you're really putting out just the minimum viable. The common understanding is that MVPs are a bit incomplete of everything, the minimum satisfactory. The shift of paradigm that needs to happen, and can be challenging, is to think in terms of the smallest (quickest to achieve) yet complete from a user satisfaction point of view application. It is possible.

En el 2024 y en la era del No-Code estás a algunas horas de silla y tutoriales de distancia de poder hacer casi cualquier cosa. OBVIO que tu MVP no será perfecto, y esta perfecto (valga la redundancia) que así sea. No buscamos la perfección al inicio sino velocidad de aprendizaje. Aprender de nuestros clientes 'qué funciona' para potenciarlo y 'qué no funciona' para arreglarlo o eliminarlo.

Launching your MVP might run into a few common challenges: -Making sure your product has enough important features but isn't too complicated for users. -Encouraging users to give your basic product a shot, especially when there are other options out there. -Efficiently allocating time, budget, and manpower for MVP development. -Ensuring a balance between speed and quality to avoid bugs and usability issues. -Maintaining brand integrity while offering a simplified product version.

As early as possible get your product in customers' hands and get their feedback then iterate on that feedback. You shouldn't feel ready to launch your product, it should work just well enough that it solves one core problem. Get feedback, iterate launch, then continue that cycle even when it feels uncomfortable.

Involve your customers in the building process. By making them feel that they have a real impact on the final product, showing care and interest like that will build a strong bond and secure your top customers. Not to mention, you will avoid bigger bumps after the deploy, and make sure you got your main features right.

Evaluating MVP (Minimum Viable Product) readiness involves assessing whether the product has enough features to satisfy early customers and provide feedback for future product development. Key criteria include: - Core Functionality: Ensures the MVP performs its primary function well. - User Experience: Simple, intuitive interface that facilitates user tasks. - Value Proposition: Clearly demonstrates the benefit or solution it offers to users. - Feedback Mechanism: Includes ways to gather user feedback effectively. - Market Fit: Addresses a fundamental need or problem in the target market. - Technical Stability: Free of critical bugs, with reliable performance.

An MVP should be just that, a minimum viable product. Solve a problem that people are willing to pay to have solved for them in a more efficient way than they currently solve that problem. Fancy stuff can follow, better efficiencies can come through feedback & iteration.

Revisit all of your solution interviews & quantitative analysis, and decide how your MVP is going to deliver the value that you promised to the users. If the MVP is too shallow, people will be unimpressed. If it’s too bloated, people will be confused. It’s important to contrast an MVP with a smoke-test approach where you build a teaser site — for example, a signup site with links to social networks. With a smoke-test page, you’re testing the risk that the message isn’t compelling enough to get signups. With the MVP, you’re testing the risk that the product won’t solve a need that people want solved in a way that will make them permanently change their behavior. The former tests the problem messaging; the latter, the solution effectiveness.

If you haven't done this YET, you MUST list out the assumptions and questions your MVP is built to address. - What are we trying to investigate with this MVP? - What will be considered successful? - What are we unsure of and need market validation from? These are essential elements to build your entire MVP strategy around, and will help you understand at the end if "we did a good job or not".

Don't overcomplicate it. Your goal is to get the MVP into the hands of your target market. Cold email, Product Hunt, X, LinkedIn, personal emails. Wherever that audience is you go to them. Once you have users you focus on iterating based on their feedback, if you continue to do this, your existing customers will help drive your product development and growth.

Lanzar una página web que explique MUY BIEN a quien vas a ayudar, a lograr qué en cuanto tiempo y a cambio de cuánto dinero. Detallar muuuuy bien como vas a ayudar a tu cliente a lograr su transformación deseada y crear una lista de espera para empezar a acumular potenciales clientes interesados. Estas son a las personas a las que vas a contactar cuando tengas 100% desarrollado el MVP y de esta lista de espera deberían salir tus primeros 10 clientes de pago.

Lauch it, once you have customers that are ready to buy. I learned it the hard way. As a tech guy i was so focused on developing the product that i overcomplicated it, and totally forgot about the clients. Simple leasons learned - Product can be imperfect, sales can't.

Audiência é a chave. Crie uma pequena audiência em redes sociais e grupo de pessoas próximas para quando lan?ar o seu MVP você conseguir ter uma grande quantidade de feedback. Fa?a tráfego pago para a sua página, mesmo que seja pouco.

Launching your MVP is like throwing a party—start early, learn as you go, and cherish every guest. Don't aim for perfection; let the authentic experience shine through. Share different stories to see which one sparks the most joy in your guests. Listen closely to their feedback—it's the secret sauce for improvement. Treat reviews like personal messages; respond promptly with warmth and appreciation. Your supporters aren't just attendees; they're friends who make the celebration special. Express genuine gratitude; it's the heart of your party, turning it into a shared experience that goes beyond the launch.

Differentiating between these three MVP launch strategies was a game-changer for me: Soft Launch: Great for getting feedback and testing, but not for a full rollout. Hard Launch: Best for well-established products with a big audience. Dark Launch: Sneakily testing new features on a small group to make improvements without disturbing everyone. Picking the right strategy for your product stage and goals can make a big difference in your journey.

En el lanzamiento de un MVP, recuerda: lánzalo temprano y ajusta constantemente. Evita buscar la perfección; lo importante es obtener feedback rápido. Experimenta con diferentes mensajes, observa qué resuena con tu audiencia y usa esos comentarios para iterar y mejorar. Responde ágilmente a las rese?as y valora a tus primeros usuarios. Este enfoque iterativo y orientado al aprendizaje es clave para alcanzar tus objetivos de lanzamiento con confianza.

The dark launch is an interesting approach. A launch methodology based on the process of continuous delivery and quick "trial-error" feature updates of your MVP. You are releasing the production to a few users -usually unaware that new functionality is only for them -that's where the "dark" comes from. Tracking the user behavior in real-time is possible with this approach. It is a great way to determine whether a new update is efficient enough to scale for all users.

Just send it. When launching an MVP, perfect is the enemy of good. Knowing that you don't have a perfect product, you must stay close to customer behaviors and lean into customer success in order to build a relationship with early adopters in order to build a more quality product for them.

In my experiance, adding Analytics tool to track user behauviour before launching your MVP(onboarding the first users) is something what will give you precious data from day 1. This data will help you understand your users and improve your ptoduct in a much faster pace.

Yesterday ?? Every feature you think is must have is most likely going to okay to have. Stick to the core pieces of your solution to a problem. Let the others come from your users.

You should launch your MVP today. There is no need to wait, understand who is the smallest audience you can service and what is the min. feature/value they are willing to pay for. Don't take too much time building, ship it fast, learn fast, and don't try to cover a large audience at first.

While launching an MVP early is an absolute game-changer, in the positive sense of the word, consider how this is actually done in YOUR industry. For example, in gaming, MVPs generally have to be a bit more polished and finished than other industries, as game mechanics are a bit trickier to test, and gamers are notoriously critical when it comes to reviewing games. Also, avoid getting in a position where you're scared of doing an MVP test (for example, investor pressure, etc.). Doing an MVP is like going to the gym - it may hurt at first, but the results make it all worthwhile!