What are some of the common cloud computing myths and misconceptions that you encounter?

The major cloud providers have some of the best security capabilities in the tech industry. I wish cloud providers would move to secure by default instead of making it a mystery that requires research and testing to get right. Turning security off for a particular reason has you realize you are taking a risk much faster than finding out you didn't configure something properly.

Cloud computing is not secure, not a myth. The fact that customers are presented with cute interfaces doesn't mean anything in regards to what happens in the backend. It's full deception platform based on hope that things are done right, and NOTHING can be verified. When everything is virtual, there is no real control. And, on top of this, threat landscape is now highly focused on cloud abused and corrupted cloud platforms many times. Thinking cloud is secure is an illusion. To get cloud pseudo secure, it costs tons, requires huge skilled teams, and yet, even with the best practices, you have no idea with what happens in the backend. You best chance is encrypting everything BEFORE data reach the dangerous cloud. Not a myth !

Cloud computing is as secure as the cloud management team that you hire. Going with one of big guys has a lot of benefits. The future is virtual computing( VM's as it is). What this means is an employee logs in with their favorite device and is immediately on their work machine. Their VM can be located on any server anywhere in the world. I like the thought for a small company to own their cloud and hire someone to manage their equipment.

Cloud computing operates on a multi-layered or siloed architecture. While cloud providers are responsible for securing the Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) layer, the responsibility for security in the higher layers, such as Platform as a Service (PaaS) and Software as a Service (SaaS), falls on the users or administrators of these services. These higher layers must be secured with appropriate measures tailored to their specific level. Only when the entire cloud computing stack is secured, can we call it a secure cloud. However, cloud providers cannot be solely held responsible for any shortcomings.

Furthermore, cloud providers typically have dedicated security teams and adhere to industry best practices and compliance standards to ensure the security of their infrastructure and services. With proper implementation and adherence to security protocols, cloud computing can provide a secure environment for data storage and processing, making it a reliable option for organizations seeking robust security measures.

Cloud computing has opened up so many possibilities with its myriad of solutions. If you're looking for lots of flexibility IaaS has the building blocks to assemble just about whatever you can conceive, maybe even your own cloud computing solution. PaaS and SaaS offer benefits for companies looking to reduce their operational overhead but I would never say that makes these capabilities one-size-fits-all. Cloud capabilities are able to be tuned through code and configuration making them ready for even the most unique use cases.

That's true it's a myth. Cloud only match the following use cases : - Distribution of public data at scale - testing extremely small workloads without investing in expensive stack. Anything above this is a failure. First cloud is a huge silo, when it fails, it takes all the customers with it. Cloud leaks constantly, due both to poor security by default and, totally unmanageable constantly changing fake controls. Therefore, it's certainly not a one size fits all. Company that grow and stay in the cloud are doomed to fail.

Additionally, cloud computing allows organizations to choose and customize the specific services, configurations, and resources that best meet their unique requirements. They can scale their cloud resources up or down based on demand, choose specific geographic regions for data storage and compliance, and select the appropriate level of service and support. This flexibility enables businesses to optimize their cloud infrastructure and applications to align with their specific needs, ensuring that they can leverage the benefits of cloud computing in a way that is tailored to their individual circumstances.

I disagree with some of this. Initially cloud can be expensive in up front costs as you will need to give time for teams to train and adopt the new technology. Keep in mind that often the people costs outweigh the infrastructure costs. With resources devoted to moving / enabling cloud, that means less resources devoted to generating direct business value, or bringing in new costly resources to facilitate the transition. However, this is worth it in the long run when done right. Cloud is not about cost saving. It’s about investing in the future. Your making an investment in the ability to move faster, and modernize - saving people time and money, as well as enabling new innovations to differentiate your business.

Cloud computing can be affordable if you do your homework and buy comparable features for your budget. If you are afraid of bursting costs then find a provider that can provide a stable fixed price for their capabilities. If you have engineered your solution to take advantage of on-demand cost models then it's entirely possible to achieve an affordable solution. The real tip here is that you have to put in a little bit of work to be a knowledgeable cloud consumer and treat cost efficiency modeling as part of your engineering work when you decide to move to the cloud.

That's a proven fact. Cloud is extremely expensive as soon as workloads grow. The model is a dangerous trap. Small workload are definitely scalable, but the cost raise exponentially compared to the service. Not only this, but cloud is designed with customer lock in mind, and crazy fees for outgoing bandwidth. Cloud is therefore very aligned with ransomware model, all the data can get in mostly for free, but then, access to the data, or taking the data out is extremely expensive. Very much like having to pay a ransom. Stories are piling up and organizations are rushing into cloud exit strategies seeing in these difficult times that cloud is killing the businesses. Many cases are shown, lot of big players rushing out of cloud due to cost.

It is expensive vs a in-house server. A server with maintenance for 1tb of data is much less than having it on the cloud. So for small clients less than 30 users is better to have in house

Furthermore, cloud computing eliminates the costs associated with maintaining and managing on-premise infrastructure, such as power, cooling, physical security, and data center maintenance. Cloud services also provide economies of scale, allowing businesses to benefit from shared resources and the ability to leverage advanced technologies at a fraction of the cost. Additionally, the agility and flexibility offered by cloud computing enable organizations to optimize resource allocation and avoid overprovisioning, resulting in cost savings. Overall, cloud computing can be a cost-effective solution, particularly for small and medium-sized businesses that may not have the financial resources to invest in extensive IT infrastructure.

Cloud is extremely difficult to use right. It's presented as simple, and this is why it leads to its constant state of leak. Misconfiguration is piling up. One of the main reason is that interfaces, controls, architecture is constantly changing, not allowing anyone to keep up with the added nonsense. Building secure cloud implementation requires expensive and skilled teams to stand a chance to avoid most of the cloud pitfalls. Yet, most are failing as we see with the incidents piling up on a daily basis. Cloud is so complex, that organizations don't even manage to get things running following the recommended settings in the nicely done cloud dashboard wizards. So complex, it requires third party tool to stand a chance. Not a Myth.

Additionally, cloud computing providers often offer user-friendly interfaces, intuitive dashboards, and documentation to facilitate the adoption and usage of their services. They also provide training resources and certifications to help users gain the necessary skills and knowledge. Furthermore, cloud computing allows businesses to focus on their core competencies, as they can rely on the expertise of cloud providers to handle the underlying infrastructure and technical complexities. With the right guidance and resources, cloud computing can be easily embraced and utilized by organizations of all sizes, even those without extensive technical expertise.

The difficulty level of something is a direct correlation to how well it is understood. I find the game of chess difficult. But that's because I have no interest in learning to play to a high enough level. It's exactly the case of Cloud computing. If you don't spend the time to understand the benefits. How to use it properly and securely. Then yes it's going to be difficult. And that's why there are business built on helping customers get the most from the public cloud.

Additionally, cloud providers typically have robust infrastructure with redundant components and backup systems to ensure continuous operation and minimize the risk of downtime. They invest in advanced networking technologies, load balancing, and failover mechanisms to distribute workloads and maintain service availability. Moreover, cloud providers often have geographically dispersed data centers, allowing for seamless failover and disaster recovery. While no system is entirely immune to occasional disruptions, cloud computing offers a reliable and resilient environment that can withstand and recover from potential failures more effectively than traditional on-premise solutions.

Imagine each office running a fleet of their servers. Assume a standard 2000kwh a year and let’s say 4 servers behind LB costing 8000kwh. Let’s add “cooling” to our mix. An average server should be maintained at 65 degrees. Now, consider a “datacenter”. ( an array of servers serving ,say us-east-1 ) under the support of precision cooling and temp control systems, with their own back up power source and security. Let’s assume this will host all of us-east-1 apps. Which is energy efficient? And thereby which method is eco friendly ? The answer is child’s play. In simpler terms, a super market will surely be more eco friendly than 100 shops lined up one after another with 100 people who aren’t really worried about ecosystem. Get the drift?

Cloud computing's shared infrastructure model allows for the consolidation of computing resources, leading to higher resource utilization and reduced energy consumption. Virtualization technologies used in cloud environments optimize hardware utilization, enabling more efficient use of server capacity. Cloud providers also invest in energy-efficient data centers, utilizing advanced cooling techniques and renewable energy sources. By leveraging the cloud, organizations can contribute to a greener IT ecosystem by minimizing their energy usage, carbon emissions, and overall environmental impact.

A misconception is that moving to the cloud guarantees instant results and minimal effort. While cloud migration can bring benefits, it requires careful planning, application refactoring, and data transfer. The transition can be complex and time-consuming, especially for large and intricate systems. Another misconception is that Cloud Computing eliminates IT Staff. Cloud computing can offload some operational tasks, but IT staff remains essential for managing cloud resources, optimizing performance, ensuring security, and aligning technology with business objectives. Their role has only evolved from managing hardware to managing services and architecture.

Other myths: Cloud computing is only for tech companies: Cloud computing is for businesses across various industries Cloud migration is an all-or-nothing decision: Organizations can adopt a hybrid approach, gradually moving some applications and services to the cloud allowing for a more flexible and tailored approach. Cloud computing is a short-term trend: Cloud computing has proven to be a long-term, transformative technology. Cloud computing eliminates the need for backups: While cloud providers offer data redundancy and backup options, it is still essential for organizations to have their own backup strategies Cloud computing is only suitable for large-scale operations: Cloud services can be beneficial for businesses of all sizes