登录查看更多内容

What are the pros and cons of using clustering vs. density-based methods for anomaly detection?

由人工智能和领英社区提供技术支持

Anomaly detection is the task of finding patterns or data points that deviate from the normal or expected behavior in a dataset. It has many applications in data science, such as fraud detection, network security, fault diagnosis, and outlier analysis. However, not all datasets have clear labels or predefined classes to identify the anomalies. In such cases, unsupervised learning methods can be used to discover the hidden structure and clusters of the data, and then detect the anomalies based on their distance or density from the clusters. In this article, we will compare two common types of unsupervised learning methods for anomaly detection: clustering and density-based methods.

此文章中的业界达人

由社区从 5 条内容中精选。了解更多

Vinita Silaparasetty

Chief Data Scientist | Generative AI Expert | Author | Speaker | Google Developer Expert in Machine Learning | Google…

1 Clustering methods

Clustering methods group data points into clusters based on their similarity or proximity and assign labels to each cluster. Data points that belong to small or sparse clusters, or that are far away from their assigned cluster, can be considered anomalies. Examples of clustering methods include k-means, hierarchical clustering, and spectral clustering. Clustering has several advantages, such as being simple, intuitive, and scalable. However, there are also drawbacks to consider. Choosing the number of clusters or a threshold to define the cluster size can be difficult or subjective. Additionally, the method is sensitive to noise, outliers, and the shape and size of the clusters which can affect the quality and stability of results. Furthermore, clustering may not capture local density variations or complex structures of data which can lead to false positives or false negatives.

添加您的观点

Vinita Silaparasetty

Chief Data Scientist | Generative AI Expert | Author | Speaker | Google Developer Expert in Machine Learning | Google Women Techmakers Ambassador | LION - Open Networker
举报内容
Pros: 1) Clustering methods can be useful for detecting anomalies in large datasets where it is difficult to manually identify patterns or outliers. 2) They can be applied to both unsupervised and semi-supervised learning, which can be useful when there is a lack of labeled data. 3) Clustering methods can identify both global and local anomalies, providing a comprehensive view of the data. 4) They can be used for real-time anomaly detection, enabling immediate responses to detected anomalies.

已翻译

赞
Vinita Silaparasetty

Chief Data Scientist | Generative AI Expert | Author | Speaker | Google Developer Expert in Machine Learning | Google Women Techmakers Ambassador | LION - Open Networker
举报内容
Cons: 1) Clustering methods can be sensitive to the choice of parameters, such as the number of clusters, distance metric, and clustering algorithm. 2) Improper parameter selection can result in poor clustering and inaccurate anomaly detection. 3) They may not be effective for identifying anomalies in highly variable or noisy datasets where the boundaries between clusters are indistinct. 4) Clustering methods can be computationally expensive, particularly for large datasets, which can limit their applicability in real-world scenarios. 5) They may not be effective for identifying anomalies that are subtle or hidden within a cluster of similar data points.

已翻译

赞

2 Density-based methods

Density-based methods are used to identify data points in dense regions as normal, and those in low-density regions as anomalies. These methods don't require specifying the number of clusters or labels, rather, they use a density threshold or a neighborhood size to define the density level. Examples of density-based methods are DBSCAN, LOF, and Isolation Forest. The advantages of these methods include being robust to noise and outliers, and being able to handle arbitrary shapes and sizes of the clusters. However, they also have some challenges, such as needing to choose the density threshold or the neighborhood size which may depend on the scale and distribution of the data; they may not perform well on high-dimensional or sparse data where density estimation can be unreliable; and they may not distinguish between different types of anomalies.

添加您的观点

Vinita Silaparasetty

Chief Data Scientist | Generative AI Expert | Author | Speaker | Google Developer Expert in Machine Learning | Google Women Techmakers Ambassador | LION - Open Networker
举报内容
Cons: 1) Density-based methods can be sensitive to the choice of parameters, such as the neighborhood radius or the minimum number of points required to form a cluster. Poor parameter selection can result in either too many or too few clusters, leading to inaccurate anomaly detection. 2) They may not be effective for identifying anomalies in datasets with highly variable or non-uniform density distributions. 3) Density-based methods can be computationally expensive, particularly for large datasets, which can limit their applicability in real-world scenarios. 4) They may not be effective for identifying anomalies that are subtle or hidden within a cluster of similar data points.

已翻译

赞
Vinita Silaparasetty

Chief Data Scientist | Generative AI Expert | Author | Speaker | Google Developer Expert in Machine Learning | Google Women Techmakers Ambassador | LION - Open Networker
举报内容
Pros: 1) Density-based methods can identify both global and local anomalies in a dataset, providing a comprehensive view of the data. 2) They can handle noise and outliers effectively by treating them as anomalies or noise points in the data. 3) Density-based methods can automatically adapt to changes in the density of data points, making them useful for detecting anomalies in dynamic environments. 4) They do not require a priori knowledge of the number of clusters or the shape of the data distribution, making them more flexible and robust to different types of data.

已翻译

赞

3 How to choose

The choice of the best method for anomaly detection depends on several factors, such as the characteristics of the data, the type and severity of the anomalies, the computational resources, and the evaluation criteria. Therefore, it is important to understand the assumptions and limitations of each method, and to compare and validate their performance on the specific problem domain. As a general guide, if the data has clear and well-separated clusters with outliers as anomalies, clustering methods may be sufficient and efficient. If the data has complex or irregular clusters with low-density points as anomalies, density-based methods may be more suitable and accurate. Additionally, if the data is high-dimensional or sparse, dimensionality reduction or feature selection techniques may be necessary to improve density estimation or clustering quality. Finally, if there are different types of anomalies such as contextual or collective anomalies, additional features or rules may be required to capture contextual or temporal information.

添加您的观点

Vinita Silaparasetty

Chief Data Scientist | Generative AI Expert | Author | Speaker | Google Developer Expert in Machine Learning | Google Women Techmakers Ambassador | LION - Open Networker
(已编辑)
举报内容
Clustering methods are suitable for datasets with well-defined clusters and when the anomalies are expected to be located far from any cluster, while density-based methods are suitable for datasets with variable density and when the anomalies are expected to be located in low-density regions. It's important to evaluate the performance of both clustering and density-based methods on your specific dataset and anomaly detection task before choosing which method to use.

已翻译

赞

4 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

添加您的观点

Data Science

+ 关注

给文章评分

我们借助人工智能创建了此文章。您认为这篇文章怎么样？

很棒不太好

举报此文章

查看全部

What are the pros and cons of using clustering vs. density-based methods for anomaly detection?

1

2

3

4

1 Clustering methods

2 Density-based methods

3 How to choose

4 Here’s what else to consider

Data Science

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

更多Data Science相关文章

更多相关阅读内容

What are the pros and cons of using clustering vs. density-based methods for anomaly detection?

1

2

3

4

1 Clustering methods

2 Density-based methods

3 How to choose

4 Here’s what else to consider

Data Science

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

查看其他技能