What do you do if your writers and literary critics clash?

Criticism, though negative is feedback that can help you become a better writer. We must understand the importance of criticism and embrace it to fully reap benefits it delivers. One way to do this effectively is to maintain an open and objective mind. This is the only way you will be able to appreciate the value it brings.

Clash between writers and literary critics is the essence of all art. It's healthy and quite important for both entities to grow. As a writer, without criticism it is impossible to understand if what we write is getting translated into what reaches the reader. It is quite easy to get indulgent in our own world forgetting that there is a reader out there. With time, we learn to understand what criticism we should take and incorporate into our writing and what doesn't apply to it. As a critic, what we do is try and give the writer a reality check. Although the intention of the writer was X but what comes out of the writing is Y. Accompanying criticisms with healthy suggestions on what could have been done better and how, goes a long way!

If writers and literary critics clash, facilitate open dialogue to understand each party's perspective. Encourage respectful discourse, focusing on constructive criticism rather than personal attacks. Highlight the importance of differing viewpoints in literary analysis. Seek common ground and emphasize the shared goal of enriching literary discourse. Encourage writers to consider feedback for growth while reminding critics to acknowledge the subjectivity of interpretation. Ultimately, foster an environment where both writers and critics feel valued and understood.

Criticism is important, but it also has to be phrased in a constructive manner if the intent is to actually help, otherwise it's just a bad review. Bad reviews happen, it's part of the game. But if the intent is to criticize in order to improve, then the critic needs to understand that their phrasing matters. Writers need to understand that they won't improve without feedback and not to get upset by it. Bad reviews hurt, no matter what. The only thing to do is work on thick skin and accept that your work isn't for everyone.

Criticism should always be taken in a positive spirit. These words are tools to remove our shortcomings. Just as while making an idol, we correct it as soon as wrong feelings are incorporated, in the same way, by making the idol of our personality in the form of criticism, we witness the creation of a healthy and beautiful character.

Criticism sometimes is hard to swallow but if you already have Bias against a person through negative responses, you may feel hard done by. If on the other hand you can accept that some advice is a way to receive Wins then you may learn to improve yourself by being open Enough to Listen to critics

It is the mark of an educated mind to entertain a thought without accepting it! So for the sake of exchange of experience and learning it is good to know the perspectives of each other and see where we stand

How about learning from each other and leaning on each other's strengths? That's how one can make a bridge between writers and literary critics!

The onset of A.I will be a constructive way to receive criticism but without the sting of critics. Your writings may lose a lot of your personal touch but they may create better Value for You

Look, there are two aspects to this. There's food you don't like but sometimes might be forced to have it. You can have it, maybe it'll cause you a bad stomach but you'll just be more careful to avoid it or find a better alternative it. Then there's food you are allergic to. You absolutely can't have it once you've recognised and aware of the allergy. Make note of your critics. Do you not like them or allergic to them? Decide your responses accordingly.

There was an era when critics were placed higher than the object of their criticism. Therefore, critics are often seen as judges and their criticism as a verdict. In the current digital era, the atmosphere has become more egalitarian. Information about the critic's reputation is easier for readers to know. In this way, readers can assess the substance of criticism more objectively. A writer's vulnerability when criticized often becomes a lever for his personal brand rather than destroying it. Therefore, accept criticism as part of the process of becoming stronger, admit weaknesses humbly and always be honest about the input you receive.