What do you do if your critical thinking skills are lacking during conflicts?

Imagine yourself as a skilled conductor orchestrating a symphony of emotions. Just as a maestro pauses to gather the orchestra's energy before a crescendo, taking a moment to pause in conflict allows you to harmonize your thoughts and emotions. It's like stepping back to admire a painting before adding the final brushstroke. This intentional pause grants you the opportunity to fine-tune your response, ensuring it resonates with clarity and wisdom rather than being drowned out by the cacophony of heated emotions.

Taking a moment to pause before reacting in a conflict allows you to calm your emotions and think more clearly. This prevents impulsive decisions that could worsen the situation. By giving yourself a brief timeout, you create space for rational thinking to kick in, leading to a more thoughtful response and better conflict resolution.

During conflict it can be easy to let your emotional default take over. The ability to detach in such circumstances is a skill. Pause, breathe, and calm your nervous system. This creates space for logical reasoning allowing you to act in your best interest rather than making the situation worse.

hay una frase que me encanta y les comparto "Que tu emoción no domine la razon" podemos estar en situaciones criticas de conflicto que nos pueden llevar a un punto que no queremos tomando decisiones incorrectas, desde mi experiencia recomeindo hacer una pausa breve (Muy breve) y te preguntes: ?Qué quiero lograr de esta conversación? y esta simple pregunta te va a llevar al resultado y que cualquier emoción que este en el medio no te permita perder el foco

Firstly, analyze whether you have a comprehensive understanding of the conflict's underlying causes and dynamics. This involves identifying all pertinent factors contributing to the disagreement, such as differing perspectives, values, or goals. Secondly, scrutinize the cognitive processes at play during the conflict. Are individuals approaching the situation with a rational, logical mindset, or are emotions dominating their thought processes? Emotions can cloud judgment and hinder objective analysis, leading to impulsive reactions rather than reasoned responses. It has been my experience that effective communication and empathy are essential for understanding the perspectives and concerns of all parties involved.

In the midst of conflict, it's vital to clarify before assuming. Ask questions to grasp the other person's viewpoint and the key issues. This not only shows your openness but also equips you with insights for objective analysis. Clearing up misunderstandings uncovers the root of the conflict, while understanding the context aids in crafting a logical response.

Seeking clarity involves taking a step back to gather all relevant information, asking questions to understand the situation better, and ensuring that you have a clear grasp of the conflict's context and complexities. By seeking clarity, you can avoid making hasty decisions, misinterpreting information, or escalating conflicts unnecessarily. This approach allows you to approach the conflict with a clearer perspective, enabling you to make informed decisions based on a deeper understanding of the issues at hand. Seeking clarity promotes effective communication, problem-solving, and conflict resolution in data science scenarios.

Utilizing open-ended questions is a powerful way to enhance dialogue, as it prompts individuals to share their thoughts and emotions in a more detailed manner. This approach fosters a richer comprehension of the core issues and feelings involved, laying a solid groundwork for resolving conflicts more effectively. It cultivates a space where everyone feels acknowledged and valued, which can ease tensions and encourage a more cooperative approach to problem-solving. Furthermore, when individuals are prompted to propose their own solutions, it not only fosters a sense of responsibility towards resolving the dispute but also contributes to lasting resolutions and strengthens the bonds between those involved.

Knowing how to communicate is an art that is only within the reach of the best professionals. The technical component must be transmitted with sufficient quality and simplicity for an external person to understand the problem that exists.

Sé consciente de tus propios sesgos y prejuicios que pueden influir en tu percepción de la situación. Trabaja en identificar y superar estos sesgos para poder evaluar la situación de manera más objetiva. Presta atención a todas las partes involucradas en el conflicto y trata de comprender sus perspectivas y preocupaciones. Escuchar activamente te ayudará a obtener una visión más completa de la situación. Abre tu mente a diferentes perspectivas y enfoques para enriquecer tu análisis. Considerar diferentes puntos de vista te permitirá ver la situación desde ángulos diversos y encontrar soluciones más creativas.

Posing the right inquiries, especially those that are open-ended, plays a crucial role in deepening comprehension and challenging the perspectives of both oneself and others. Such questions pave the way for a more exploratory and discursive approach, enabling a shift from mere superficial answers to a more in-depth investigation of the root issues and presuppositions. Engaging in this form of inquiry not only brings clarity to your reasoning but also promotes a more comprehensive analysis of the dispute in question.

In civil engineering it is important to know the right time to speak and listen. Equally or more important is reflecting on the topic that gives rise to the discussion and disagreement. What is the origin? Does the problem have a solution? What should I do as a professional to convey my point of view?

Critical thinking involves considering alternative solutions and viewpoints, especially in conflicts. Avoid sticking to your initial position; instead, explore different options and perspectives. This open-minded approach fosters compromise and innovative resolutions, showing your dedication to addressing everyone's concerns.

Si dudad de la solución a la que puedes llegar, esfuerza un poco mas tu mente y realizar hipotesis distintas, estas hipotesis te van a situar en un punto de exploración y creatividad lo cual te permitirá llegar a un pensamiento mas adecuando ante cualquier conflicto o situación compleja que puedas estar transitando

Embracing diverse perspectives and potential solutions, particularly during disagreements, is a hallmark of critical thinking. Rather than rigidly adhering to your initial stance, consider embracing a variety of viewpoints and alternatives. This approach not only demonstrates a commitment to addressing the concerns of all involved but also encourages the discovery of creative and mutually agreeable solutions

The best leaders always utilize their resources. Not only your employees, but allied colleagues, and even competitors can be tapped for information that can led to a resolution.

Al aplicar la lógica de manera efectiva durante la gestión de conflictos, podrás mejorar tu capacidad para analizar situaciones complejas, tomar decisiones fundamentadas y encontrar soluciones que aborden las causas subyacentes de los conflictos de manera efectiva. La lógica te permitirá navegar por los desafíos de manera estructurada y estratégica, facilitando la resolución de conflictos de manera más eficiente y constructiva.

When applying logic one needs to consider that not everyone thinks logically. Some people are very stubborn. Some are also very stupid. Ultimately one must remember Upton Sinclair's wise words: "It is difficult to get a person to understand something when their salary depends upon them not understanding it."* *amended from the original to be gender neutral as the problem is not always a man.

applying logic will give you the right direction and idea to plan ahead. this will help you to communicate sensibly and perfectly.

At the peak of conflict its okay to not have your critical thinking skills at full usage . This is okay because you're human and not an automated machine trained on giving solutions to issues spontaneously. What you need to do is get the conflicting parties to retreat. Then you can take a break to think/replay the issue, analyzing the situation, what led to it and how best to resolve it.

Reprogram the same situation and detect the points of weakness (could be lack of knowledge in a subject) and try to retry and learn how you should have reacted. You could learn more and this way you will have a more persuasive argument.