What are the challenges of interpreting AI art without a physical context?

In fact, the interpretation of AI-created art without a physical context generates several issues. The inability to interact physically prevents the appreciation of textures and sizes, which in itself limits perception. Additionally, there is the complexity of situating it within a cultural and/or social context due to the lack of physical perception. Finally, without a creator with history and trajectory, the artwork will appear depersonalized. Although there are no rules for art appreciation, human perception, in the context that currently predominates in art appreciation, seems difficult to replace. This does not mean that the situation will not change, and in fact, it may change sooner than we can imagine.

The challenges of interpreting AI art are akin to the broader issues faced in AI deployment, such as privacy, complexity, and obsolescence, which can affect how AI art is received and understood by the public1. The interpretation of AI art, therefore, requires a nuanced approach that considers these limitations and the unique nature of AI as a creative tool.

First of all there is NO such thing as AI art; it simply doesn't exist. There are only AI generated images from generative AI that has stolen and trained on living artist's art with no warning or compensation. META will not allow the living artists in the US to opt out of their AI training on the art they have posted on META; although in other areas of the world opt out is allowed. So this question is irelevant.

While AI art offers exciting possibilities in terms of creativity and accessibility, the sensory limitations highlight a key distinction between digital and traditional mediums. Appreciating art through all senses adds layers of meaning and connection that are hard to replicate in a digital format. This is an important consideration for both artists and audiences as technology continues to evolve and shape our experiences of art.

Interpretar a arte gerada por IA sem um contexto físico apresenta desafios como a falta de referências culturais e históricas que normalmente informam a compreens?o. A ausência de inten??o humana pode dificultar a percep??o de emo??es e significados profundos. Além disso, a interpreta??o pode variar amplamente entre espectadores, levando a ambiguidades. A arte da IA requer novas formas de análise que considerem algoritmos, dados de treinamento e a influência do criador humano.

When art is presented without this tangible context, it may not evoke the same depth of emotion. For example, a sculpture's imposing size or the texture of a painting's brushstrokes can be lost in digital representation, leading to a less impactful experience. The absence of a physical piece to engage with can result in a more impersonal interaction, potentially reducing the emotional resonance that art typically seeks to inspire.

In the realm of AI art, authenticity is a pressing concern. Without the physical context that traditional art provides, it's challenging to ascertain whether a piece is genuinely original or merely an algorithmic creation. The lack of tactile evidence removes a crucial layer of verification, forcing us to depend solely on digital provenance. This ambiguity can hinder our ability to fully appreciate and value AI art, as doubts about its integrity and originality persist. For AI art to gain widespread acceptance, robust mechanisms for establishing authenticity are essential.

In essence, the physicality of art plays a crucial role in its emotional influence, and the absence of this dimension in AI art can lead to a more detached and less emotionally engaging experience.

The absence of a physical setting can lead to a lack of emotional engagement, as the viewer may not experience the same visceral reactions that are often elicited by the tangible presence of art. For instance, the scale and texture of a piece, which contribute significantly to its impact, are difficult to convey digitally. This can result in a more detached interaction with the artwork, potentially diminishing the emotional response.

The consumption of AI art in our solitary homes can create such isolation and overstimulation. The availability and oversaturation of AI art can overwhelm the senses as you fall into the habit of mindless scrolling. This action can take away from the consumption of viewing art as a part of a community, where discussions, questions and considerations can take place in real time as you shift your perspective based on engaging conversations. I think that the accessibility of AI images create a lack of appreciation and enjoyment of pieces that are created by artists and shared in public spaces for a shared experience.

Douglas Hofstadter is worried about Ai becoming far more advanced in the future, where they develop so far that they are no longer able to relate to humans. In talking to LLM's about art I could see this as a possibility. However, if we use them to communicate and keep the dialogue open and develop them further this could be diverted. Either simulated empathy or new tech that develops ability would be a solution. Otherwise, the connection is already noticeable in the missing 'feeling' element of computer generated art. Human art is designed around feelings and helps us interpret the world as we experience it alongside dissecting existential dilemmas.

The concept of AI art transcending mere visual interpretation and engaging with a broader sensory experience is indeed a fascinating prospect. As technologies like Neuralink explore the interface between the human brain and computers, it opens up the potential for direct neural communication with AI. This will revolutionize the way we interact with art, allowing us to experience creative works not just visually, but with multiple senses, perhaps even those beyond our current sensory capabilities. The future of AI in art could lead to immersive experiences that engage our emotions, memories, and sensations in ways we have yet to fully understand or imagine. It's an exciting time as we stand on the new horizons in art and technology.

AI generated art is like a ghost in the machine, hollow and lifeless. It carries no danger, no spark. With no scars to show, no stories to tell, it falls absolutely flat and remains utterly uninspiring.