What are the best ways to build a research team that can win grants for your university?

Would recommend that: 1. the research team be transdidciplinary 2. systemic, systematic, and integrative in its work 3. be mindful of emerging AI capabilities 4. strategically utilize them

Build a Diverse Team Break the siloes of knowledge and think creatively about the team to help propel the research. Challenge yourself to imagine a truly cross-disciplinary team with diverse background and perspectives. It is like cooking. When the ingredients are good and well thought out and the techniques are solid, the outcome will inevitably be amazing. Consider other layers of diversity too - gender, race, ethnicity, etc.

Apart from the spectrum of responses currently offered here, there are mechanisms that must be brought into play. These help to cover the hygiene factors like mapping the boundaries of a research topic for different situations - PhD or graduate research (for me I no longer supervise PhDs but PhDTechs and graduate XTechs), or use in writing grant proposals, for use in teaching company work, et cetera. For all of these purposes, especially if you are a trained Global Corporate Academic habituated to producing XTech graduates instead of traditional and very linear graduate students, you need to interrogate the topic or a call for proposal forensically, by voicing your takes on all key terms, and playing back and summarising the key points.

A good concept and the ability to persuade the granting institution's reviewers are the main factors in a successful grant application. To effectively advocate an idea, one must undertake thorough background research, use an accepted study design, and create a technique. Recognising that research requires teamwork is crucial. Grant submissions must be well-organized and clear to potential investors to increase funding chances. Proposals must have an introduction, body (typically a project outline, needs statement, and predicted outcomes), and conclusion. thanks

Compelling research is increasingly becoming interdisciplinary. You need researchers who individually have a strong combination of ethos (character/research integrity), logos (ability to write scientifically) and pathos (passion, beliefs and values, especially as it affects your research audience). Furthermore, onboarding a team in which the knowledge and skills of members complement one another is a great asset.

Collaborations that yield the best results are comprised of stakeholders that function as an interorganizational network, including mutual respect, a common goal, and resource sharing. Folks should also consider epistemic orientations of various stakeholders, understanding that bridging ideas that stem from different worldviews takes significant effort and skillful facilitation. Therefore, it may be worth considering including a member who can create linguistic and conceptual bridges across difference.

Studies show that problem-solving jointly improves results. People are more likely to take risks that lead to breakthrough innovations when they have team support. Teamwork promotes morale, reduces worry, and helps professionals develop. Encourage cooperation, create team-building events, and welcome researchers of different identities and opinions to make your research team happier.thanks

In addition to establishing a common understanding of everyone's roles and responsibilities, team members should develop mutual expectations about communication frequency and type, authorship order (including how it may change), and establish community guidelines to allow for intellectual risk and mutual trust.

The role of team coordinators mostly involves providing advice and guidance on team resources. However, it is the team leaders or top managers who possess the authority to make decisions that have a greater impact. The individual offers direction and supervision to a collaborative team over a certain undertaking or collection of undertakings. Thanks

The increasing competitiveness and rigour demands connected with this undertaking make the process of seeking research funding challenging in terms of complexity, time commitment, and psychological strain. An applicant must overcome many obstacles beyond just motivation if they want to remain competitive.Thanks