What are the best practices for maintaining a taxonomy in library services over time?

Sometimes taxonomy updates can be limited by what software your library runs on, but it's important to make sure your catalog is as accurate and up to date as possible. Make sure to check on collections that don't get much love (for us, that was audiovisual) and make sure everything is catalogged, clear, and organized in a way that is both accessible and saves both your time and the time of our clients.

Document the taxonomy structure, rules, and guidelines clearly. Create documentation that is easily accessible to librarians and other stakeholders involved in the taxonomy management process. It is important to design taxonomy with scalability in mind to accommodate future growth and changes in content.

Taxonomy in library service is core to organizing information and gaining control over collections with the Library of Congress subject headings and Superintendent of Documents (SuDos) classification systems as good examples of best practices. That said, in the fields of information science and archival practices there is much dialog about how to make libraries and archives more inclusive and less oppressive to groups that have historically been marginalized by White-dominated systems in similar ways to artificial intelligence algorithms. Professional organizations are the best places to engage in ongoing conversations about reviewing taxonomy in relation to local communities so data can be linked.

I believe that this depends also on the kind of library you have. For example, I work in a highly specialized but relatively small library. Much depends on your library management system and how / if it can order your call number system properly and do searches, including advanced searches.

The taxonomy should be regularly reviewed and updated to ensure its relevance and accuracy. Stakeholder involvement is crucial and version control is implemented to track changes. The taxonomy should adhere to metadata standards, maintain scalability, and have a user-friendly interface. Thorough documentation is necessary and a consistent governance structure is established. Training sessions are conducted for library staff on taxonomy management procedures. The taxonomy should be integrated with library systems and a feedback mechanism is implemented to gather user input. By following these best practices, libraries can create a robust and adaptable taxonomy that enhances the organization and accessibility of their collections.

It should be noted that the names in taxonomy may change based on time changes. When updating names in taxonomy, considerations should be taken into account, such as using continuous naming conventions, preventing ambiguity, ensuring logical relationships, and documentary change. Some instructions must be observed and evaluated continuously. As mentioned, when updating names in taxonomy, relevant stakeholders such as librarians, users or system supervisors should be informed so that they do not provide the customer wrong information.

Many words are added to all languages on a regular basis. Not to mention many new subjects are created due to new discoveries and updated information. It is a good idea to keep taxonomies up to date. And not just due to current versus archaic vocabulary terms. Customers will need and want to find information under the terms they are familiar with and are searching for material about.

Es importante, considerar además que se están incorporando a nuestra disciplina, los conceptos de ontología y esquema (schema), que tienen una mirada desde la perspectiva de los datos enlazados, siendo una mirada menos rígida que las taxonomías jerárquicas tradicionales. En ese sentido, es importante que además de los términos de la taxonomía, nosotros también como profesionales de biblioteca, nos actualicemos en nuestra propia formación.

Know your patrons' needs and your local school system's gaps as well, customer is always right! Make sure all of your taxonomy is also in line with your cities' governmental systems and needs, in other words, do your research and the entire process should also parallel your stacks and make sure your research on hand for public use is consistent, easy to access and make copies of and is current.

- ensure taxonomy reflects knowledge and resources. Update categories and terms as needed; - Gather feedback from library users - Implement version control for your taxonomy to track changes over time - Involve library staff, subject experts, and stakeholders in the taxonomy development and maintenance process - finally Keep detailed documentation

To confirm the taxonomy structure and maintain it in the best way, it is better to get help from experts. There are many professional librarians who are experts in taxonomy. It is important to choose the right people to define the classification structure because they must both participate in the process of its implementation and monitor its results. It should be ensured that this taxonomy structure is coherent, coherent and balanced and covers all relevant aspects and dimensions of the domain and avoids redundancy or overlap. After that, just like a visitor, you can browse, search, filter or test the quality of the classification

When I first graduated I was very excited by the emerging possibilities in databases. I believed that staff should have access to the opac in a wiki form enabling them to attach feedback to redundancies and errors in the catalogue record. The process was (and is) to send a detailed email to systems and processes which lacked immediacy and greatly reduced the level of feedback.

When I served patrons in the reference department of a library, I used standards such as controlled vocabularies, thesauruses, ontologies, or metadata schemas. This greatly affected the manual and coordination of services to patrons who referred to a specialized library in the field of history. The quality of library services was also improved accordingly. Of course, at the present time, newer control tools such as external databases, semantic web services or social media are used, which have higher speed and accuracy than in the past.

You should try to adhere to a published set of Subject Headings, like LCSH whenever possible. Remember: the choices you make will impact your institution for decades.

The guarantee of implementing criteria is more important than the written rules. Without daily measurement, such as user satisfaction, information recovery, resource management efficiency, or knowledge discovery potential, library services will not have the necessary desirability. Criteria such as accuracy, complete, communication, currency, clarity and usability in the evaluation and review of library services depend on the fact that the library manager has a precise monitoring of these work. Many librarians do not have enough time and time to regularly review the services they have provided to users and in the long run reduces the quality of their services in the long run.

Engage with the Community: Participate in relevant professional communities, conferences, and forums to stay informed about industry trends and best practices. Network with other libraries and institutions to share experiences and learn from each other. Legal and Ethical Considerations: Stay informed about legal and ethical considerations related to information organization, copyright, and data privacy. Ensure that the taxonomy complies with relevant laws and ethical standards.

También me parece pertinente revisar los sistemas bibliotecarios para verificar su relación con la taxonomía. ?Cuáles se adaptan mejor? Cambios, mejoras.