Teams are clashing over data quality roles. How do you resolve the tension?
Disputes over data quality roles can hinder productivity and team morale. Address these conflicts by establishing clear guidelines and fostering collaboration:
How do you handle role conflicts in your team? Share your strategies.
Teams are clashing over data quality roles. How do you resolve the tension?
Disputes over data quality roles can hinder productivity and team morale. Address these conflicts by establishing clear guidelines and fostering collaboration:
How do you handle role conflicts in your team? Share your strategies.
-
Data Lineage: High Impact, Low Disruption Introducing data lineage doesn’t have to feel like a massive overhaul. The key is balancing high efficacy with minimal disruption to your ongoing operations. Start small—focus on critical data flows where transparency has the most impact. Next, implement a governance framework that integrates seamlessly into your team’s existing workflows. Assign clear ownership, use automated tools to map data movement, and establish simple, actionable rules to maintain quality. The result? Clarity without chaos, and decisions powered by trusted, traceable data. Ready to make data lineage a reality without derailing your projects? Let’s connect.
-
The best way to resolve the clash is showing the carrot! The ownership of data wuality have its advantages and they need to be highlighted. The impact and resources each team has call for a data asset responsibility and can be addressed using Governance models like constellation model. A data steward from each teams needs to be avoided and communicate on teams behalf and the carrot or reward in this responsibility is the team gets streamlined capability to use the data and control the data asset and also responsible for making other teams aware of their changes on data and they can expect the same from other teams thus reducing disruptions caused by unknown data or system updates. So its win win for everyone and needs to be communicated!
-
Think of data quality like an orchestra – each section has its distinct role, but harmony requires clear direction. I've found DAMA-DMBOK's stewardship model, combined with COBIT's RACI matrices, creates this balance beautifully. The key? Start with a lightweight governance framework that defines clear swim lanes but allows for cross-functional collaboration. Regular "data quality councils" where teams align on standards while maintaining their autonomy has worked wonders. Remember: good fences make good neighbors, but bridges make great partnerships! ??