How would you navigate conflicting opinions on blockchain protocol choices within your team?

To delve into the blockchain industry, it's essential to first grasp its core concepts and technologies. 1.Determine the number of transactions your application needs to handle per second (TPS). 2. Identify if your application requires complex smart contracts. Some blockchains offer more extensive smart contract capabilities than others. 3. Consider if your application will need to scale up in the future. Some blockchains handle scaling better than others. 4. Decide on the level of decentralization needed. Highly decentralized blockchains provide more security but may compromise on performance. 5.

Before discussing blockchain, identify your project's specific needs. Are you looking for speed, security, or advanced contract features? Knowing what you need will help you choose the right protocol. For instance, when I co-founded Insomnia Labs, we needed fast transactions, so we picked a protocol that could handle many transactions per second. This approach simplified our work and united the team around a common goal.

Educate. Answer. Build. That's the mantra we implement at Antier School of Blocktech. You team members, whether beginners or professionals should have thorough understanding of the application layer followed by surface level knowledge about the governance protocols, and others.

Creating a space for open discussion is key. At Insomnia Labs, we had Innovation Fridays where team members could share and debate new ideas freely. This brought out new perspectives and strengthened our team bond. Open discussions help the best ideas come to the surface, leading to more informed decisions.

Objective comparison is about blocking the emotion based decision making. Conveying the clear message to the team that personal choices may not be logically matchable for the institution. Apple oach the available solutions in a case by case basis looking at the pros and cons. Taking an opinion from multiple experts who are unassociated with the company can help in a more unbiased and factually correct decision making process.

A clear framework can greatly improve decision-making. At Fraktal Group, we used a scoring system to prioritize project goals and technical feasibility. This approach saved time and ensured our choices fit both our strategy and practical limits. You can use a similar method to turn different opinions into a united strategy that drives your project forward.

This is an important point. Project owners deviating from the initially chosen blockchain is a real obstacle. This could happen due to multiple reasons such as an attractive Grants offering from another chain, a suddenly new chain going viral or the native token of the initial chain undergoing a terrible bear run. We strongly recommend our partners to undergo thorough R&D when choosing chains and sticking to it until production.