How would you address a client's request for additional features that may compromise system performance?

When addressing a client's request for additional features that could compromise system performance, it's crucial to prioritize transparency and alignment of expectations. Start by explaining the potential impact on system performance clearly, backed by data or performance metrics if available. Engage in a collaborative discussion to understand the client's rationale and the importance of the requested features. Propose alternative solutions or compromises that could achieve similar outcomes without compromising performance, emphasizing the importance of maintaining system stability and user experience.

Evaluate the impact of adding the new feature in terms of performance, if good performance is crucial for the application or if the performance is already at its maximum acceptable, then try to talk to the client and negotiate the non-inclusion of the feature.

In the opportunities I've had to participate, I believe the first step is to understand what the customer is looking for. Why do they need this functionality? Is it to introduce a new feature to the product? Is it to fix or improve an existing one? What benefit does it bring? Do they need it urgently or can it wait? Is there another way to achieve the same results? I think if we can "put on the customer's shoes" for a minute and understand what motivates them to seek this new functionality, we can evaluate the software solution comprehensively. This way, we can list the possible options, each with its pros and cons, to choose the most suitable one for the situation.

Typical impacts of a new feature include increased complexity and reduced system resilience, leading to more bugs and higher maintenance costs. These trade-offs should be discussed with your client. A common mistake is giving a lecture on software development; best-case, they're uninterested, worst-case, they misunderstand the explanation and make poor decisions based on what they (wrongly) understood. So, unless the client is curious or defiant, avoid details and focus on results. To do that, I usually provide simple examples and step-by-step scenarios based on their current usage to help them visualize.

é importante oferecer alternativas ao cliente que buscam equilibrar suas necessidades com o desempenho do sistema. Isso pode incluir sugerir funcionalidades similares que exigem menos recursos ou propor um plano de implementa??o gradual para minimizar o impacto inicial

When discussing alternatives, I reorient the discussion to ensure the client's actual needs are clear. Highlighting their needs rather than their wants can encourage more creative and effective solutions.

Discuss with your client to determine essential features and those that can be modified or deferred. This prioritization manages client expectations and keeps the project focused on delivering high-quality software. By focusing on what’s most important, you ensure performance is not compromised by unnecessary additions.

Priorizar recursos é essencial para manter o equilíbrio entre as demandas do cliente e a saúde do sistema. Isso significa identificar quais recursos s?o críticos para a funcionalidade principal e quais podem ser adiados ou ajustados para preservar o desempenho geral.

A otimiza??o contínua é chave quando se enfrenta solicita??es que podem comprometer o desempenho do sistema. Isso envolve n?o apenas implementar os recursos de forma eficiente, mas também monitorar e ajustar constantemente o sistema para garantir que ele opere de maneira eficaz mesmo com novas funcionalidades adicionadas