How do you include stakeholders in Scrum testing?

A "stakeholder" of a team refers to any individual, group, or organization with an interest or concern in the team's activities and outcomes. Stakeholders can affect or be affected by the team's outcomes and results. If we don't clearly define our stakeholders, we risk setting ourselves up for a situation that could lead to failure.

Being a little facetious here, but more than the specifics, I'd encourage broad recognition of who are the stakeholders and actually having conversations with then individually and collectively. Cultivate a relationships where you're having a running dialogue not just radio silence other than during the sprint review

Conduct regular sprint demos to showcase the developed features. This provides stakeholders with a tangible view of the progress and allows them to provide feedback early in the development cycle. Moreover, Collaborate with stakeholders to define the "Definition of Done" for each user story. Ensure that their expectations regarding the completeness and quality of the product are well-understood by the development and testing teams.

To include stakeholders in Scrum testing, involve them in the testing process early on. Share testing plans, invite them to participate in test sessions, and provide regular updates on testing progress. Encourage their feedback and use their insights to improve product quality and meet stakeholder expectations. By involving stakeholders in testing, you can ensure that the product meets their needs and addresses their concerns.

Hey! In Scrum testing, make it a team thing! Show off your progress regularly, get the stakeholders in on the creative process with user stories, and bring the energy to daily stand-ups and demos. Let them be the VIPs in prioritizing features. Use cool tools for collaboration and keep the feedback flowing. It's all about the vibe and creating something awesome together! ??

Involving stakeholders early and often in the testing process is crucial to aligning product development with business needs. By inviting them to participate in Scrum ceremonies, you not only validate their requirements through techniques such as user stories and acceptance testing, but also foster a collaborative environment. This approach has consistently been proven to increase trust and transparency, leading to a product that truly meets stakeholder expectations and contributes to the overall success of the project.

Involving stakeholders early and more often is a lot more important than including them on a need basis. It gives the project/scrum team a constant perspective/feedback of the product that they are developing. This leads to first time right product delivery. There are events based in scrum which helps out this into practice. Events like sprint planning, sprint review, etc.

Involving stakeholders early and often in Scrum testing is crucial for success Early Inclusion: Engage stakeholders from the sprint planning phase to align on goals and expectations. Regular Updates: Provide consistent progress reports and invite feedback throughout the testing process. Collaborative Reviews: Include stakeholders in regular sprint reviews and retrospectives to discuss outcomes and improvements. Actionable Feedback: Actively implement stakeholder suggestions to demonstrate the value of their involvement.

Stakeholders actively participate throughout the development cycle. For instance, during requirement gathering, the Product Owner (PO) engages with stakeholders to understand their expectations, documenting these as acceptance criteria. In the planning phase, the PO discusses requirements with the team and consults stakeholders for clarification on ambiguous scenarios. After completing a story, a sprint review allows stakeholders to view the developed work and provide feedback. Additionally, they can conduct User Acceptance Testing (UAT) post-demo to ensure that expectations have been met.

Start testing from hypothesis/requirements testing and make a CX/UX a part of SDLC whenever that fits the product needs. The old good principle 'fake it till you make it' works and it's often reasonable to start from A/B tests of screens and low-fi prototypes for larger products. In web-based or online-heavy apps, I always try not only to gather feedback via questionnaires but also gather information via 'hotmaps' of at least several controlled A/Bs in real-time. This blended combination of objective data and subjective opinions gives the best understanding of where we are and what is the trend specifically in our context

Include stakeholders in Sprint Retrospectives to gather their input on what went well and what can be improved in the testing process.

Implementing feedback loops and tools foster timely and transparent communication, ensuring that stakeholder input is not just heard but actively integrated into the development cycle. Regular surveys and interactive sessions like focus groups and demos can yield invaluable insights. Moreover, utilizing platforms such as Jira or Slack can centralize issue tracking and resolution, thereby streamlining the iterative process. It's crucial, however, to balance the inflow of feedback to avoid bottlenecks.

When it comes to testing, the more interactive, the better. Testing is not "the phase after development," it should start when the team receives requirements. That's when the team starts to define what successful implementation looks like.

They say "more the merrier" which is very apt for feedback & also to enable to reach the potential of feedback value for product quality. It is very critical to streamline communications through different tools & techniques and make sure that there is mechanism to act before it is too late. This is very typical challenge where there is emphasis on feedback but the loops are not completed which results into losing the feedback & opportunity to act. This can result into not only losing the feedback items but also it be becomes increasingly hard to incorporate in the subsequent cycles. If its lost for next cycle i.e. N+1, it is as good as lost for ever. Complete the loop & reap the benefits of feedback to raise the quality for end users.

Of course. Short feedback loops and transparency are important. Everyone knows that. But Scrum teams, especially in organisations relatively inexperienced in agile/scrum ways of working, are sometimes afraid to be "too open" to stakeholders, no matter how strongly the stakeholders express their wish for honest, fast, clear information about everything. Yellow flags: - "We can't give just EVERYONE blanket read access to our Jira board/SBL/PBL/etc... Right?" - "Let's schedule a private meeting to discuss this hot button issue." - "Instead of just building our ideas and testing it with the stakeholders, let's present the problem to our stakeholders and wait for a decision first."

The team should consider stakeholder feedback seriously but also retain the autonomy to make decisions based on their expertise and understanding of the project requirements.

Who you gonna trust? A bunch of answers to AI-generated marketing push or some guy like me who has been on the front line as PM, CTO, and architect for 20 years. I support self-organizing teams in my work. Stakeholders have fed back. If you are a leader, you handle this. No amount of paper, certification, or weekend training at a Sheridan Inn will substitute for real-world experience. There is no formula; you must know your team, project, and stakeholders. The LI AI is not only ignorant, but presupposes this garbage is indeed fact.

To include stakeholders in Scrum testing, I adopt a collaborative approach that emphasizes transparency and feedback. I invite stakeholders to participate in sprint reviews, where they can observe demonstrations of completed work and provide feedback directly. I also involve stakeholders in user acceptance testing (UAT), where they validate that the product meets their requirements and expectations. Additionally, I communicate regularly with stakeholders throughout the sprint, providing updates on progress and seeking their input on priorities and changes. By actively involving stakeholders in testing activities, we ensure that their perspectives are considered, and their feedback is incorporated into the development process.

Balancing stakeholder feedback with team autonomy is a delicate art in Scrum testing. Prioritization tools like MoSCoW, the Kano model, or a value proposition canvas can be instrumental in aligning feedback with product goals. Empower teams to leverage data and evidence to make agile decisions, ensuring that they are not stifled by excessive input.

This is what I responded as the last yellow flag to the previous point: "- Instead of just building our ideas and testing it with the stakeholders, let's present the problem to our stakeholders and wait for a decision first." Always Be Coding. Create things in collaboration with stakeholders, but avoid *holding back* the creation waiting for feedback or decisions. In general, it's better to have something that needs changing, than to have nothing at all.

Ah. The most overlooked part of the three Scrum Master areas of attention, and the reason there is often an unnecessary and hurtful distinction between Scrum Masters and Agile Coaches. Scrum Master serves the team - that's often clear enough, and where it always starts. To serve the product owner however is often already hard enough, as some organisations in transition tend to have the PO be relatively abstract and far away. But to serve the ORGANISATION to adopt agile practices... This is what is typically left to others and/or entirely disregarded ("Agile? Ah, that's the thing that the nerds in IT do, right?")

I was impressed once when a service provider invited me to provide a Scrum training to the customers they support. It was a very smart move. Educating the customers or educating the stakeholders in general will eliminate lots of conflicts may arise.

As per SAFe, key role of scrum master is coaching the Team. As a servant leader of Agile team, SM has to ensure key stakeholder has to be invited & everyone has to understand their R&R inside and outside Agile Team.

Promoting stakeholder education on Scrum testing not only fosters collaboration but also empowers them to provide more meaningful contributions. By sharing success stories and real-world examples, you not only enhance their understanding but also build confidence in the Scrum testing process. Establishing a continuous feedback loop for education ensures stakeholders stay informed about evolving practices, enabling them to align their expectations with the iterative nature of Scrum testing and contribute effectively to the overall success of the software development lifecycle.

Educating stakeholders on Scrum is like guiding them through a new dance. Start with simple, relatable explanations of Scrum. Use metaphors from their everyday experiences to demystify concepts. Then, let them step into the rhythm by involving them in sprints, stand-ups. This immersion helps them understand the process and its benefits. Hold regular feedback sessions. These are opportunities to answer questions, address challenges, and reinforce the Scrum process's value. Remember, everyone learns at their own pace. Some stakeholders will catch on quickly, others may need more time and patience. Tailor your coaching to their individual learning styles, ensuring each one can confidently follow the Scrum rhythm.

Celebrating and appreciating stakeholders is essential for nurturing long-lasting and beneficial relationships in any organization or project. Stakeholders can include anyone invested in the success of a project from employees and customers to investors and suppliers. Here is a concise guide on how to celebrate and appreciate stakeholders effectively: 1. Identify Stakeholders 2. Understand Contributions 3. Communicate Regularly 4. Provide Personalized Recognition 5. Celebrate Milestones 6. Feedbacks 7. Offer Exclusive Opportunities 8. Foster Community Building 9. Maintain Continuous Effort By adopting these strategies, you can create a positive and supportive environment that acknowledges the crucial role stakeholders play in your success.

The golden rule is "Get them involved". Some points may help: - Using ATDD (Acceptance Test Driven Development) bring the stakeholders into test design activity by defining the acceptance tests based on the acceptance criteria and help to clearly define it. - Using SBE (Specification By Example) approach which shape the information example, Process Example and Process Response. - Coach them in testing practice. - Get them involved.

Including stakeholders in Scrum Testing helps us in building Trust, maintaining Transparency and being flexible. Scrum Testing can be made a fun event where everyone would feel included, heard and be a part of the product journey. In order to encourage the stakeholders to be a part, spread awareness of the importance of the Scrum testing through invite, make it more interactable through in person meetings if possible or virtual sessions, conduct small interactive sessions of voting or changes needed and including stakeholders in the retrospective meetings.

"Great ideas can come from anywhere." All ideas, even the ones that are not selected or prioritized, are important to reaching the best solution. So make sure stakeholders all feel valued.

Acknowledge and appreciate the contributions of stakeholders. Celebrating milestones and showing how their feedback has been valuable can foster a positive and collaborative relationship.

Collaborative Planning: Include stakeholders in sprint planning meetings. Review Meetings: Conduct sprint reviews for stakeholder feedback. Demo Sessions: Regularly showcase completed work to stakeholders. User Acceptance Testing (UAT): Involve stakeholders in UAT for feedback. Regular Communication: Maintain open communication channels. Feedback Loops: Establish early feedback mechanisms. Collaborative Tools: Use tools for collaboration and feedback. Definition of Done (DoD): Include stakeholders in defining DoD. Retrospectives: Involve stakeholders in retrospectives. Training Sessions: Provide training on testing processes for stakeholders.

Involving stakeholders in Scrum testing not only increases transparency, but also ensures that the product evolves in line with user needs and expectations. In my experience, stakeholders who engage early become champions of the product and provide invaluable insight that can prevent potential problems. Balancing their feedback with the autonomy of the team is crucial; Enables the team to make informed decisions while maintaining the creative and innovative spirit that Scrum fosters

Shift Left is the best way, early engagement helps in cost saving and faster deliveries. More the clarity, lesser are the gaps and better n faster are the deliveries.

“Scrum testing”. There’s no such thing. There’s SOFTWARE or PRODUCT testing, software quality assurance. Dunno why people keeps mixing process with product. Scrum is a guide for some processes. At the time it takes the product’s role in your mind, it begins to be a problem.

In Scrum testing, involving stakeholders is crucial for feedback and alignment. By incorporating stakeholders at various stages and maintaining open communication, you enhance collaboration and ensure the testing process aligns with business objectives.