Each research framework has its own advantages and disadvantages, depending on your research situation and preferences. Deductive research is beneficial for testing existing theories or hypotheses, establishing causal relationships, and generalizing results. However, it can also be disadvantageous for ignoring contextual factors, oversimplifying complex phenomena, and limiting creativity and innovation. Inductive research is advantageous for exploring new phenomena, generating new theories or hypotheses, and understanding meanings and experiences. On the other hand, it can be disadvantageous for lacking empirical validation, being subjective and biased, and having limited applicability and transferability. Abductive research is advantageous for explaining unexpected or puzzling phenomena, creating novel and useful solutions, and bridging gaps and contradictions. Yet, it can also be disadvantageous for being speculative and uncertain, requiring high levels of creativity and intuition, and being difficult to evaluate and replicate. Mixed research is advantageous for addressing complex and multifaceted research questions, integrating and triangulating different types of data, methods, and perspectives, and enhancing the validity and reliability of the research. However, it can also be disadvantageous for being time-consuming and resource-intensive, requiring high levels of expertise and coordination, and facing potential conflicts and inconsistencies.