Assessing the level of conflict escalation can be done through the conflict escalation ladder, a model developed by Friedrich Glasl. This ladder has nine rungs, each representing a stage of conflict intensity from mild disagreement to complete breakdown. The higher the rung, the more difficult it is to resolve the conflict peacefully. Hardening is the first rung and involves feeling annoyed, frustrated, or dissatisfied with the other party but still respecting them and communicating openly. Debate is the second rung and includes arguing, criticizing, or blaming the other party while still listening to their views and trying to find a solution. Actions is the third rung and involves taking actions that demonstrate opposition, such as forming alliances or withholding information. Images is the fourth rung and involves seeing the other party as an enemy, a threat, or a stereotype while losing trust and empathy. Loss of face is the fifth rung and includes attacking the other party's reputation, credibility, or integrity while trying to humiliate or discredit them. Strategies is the sixth rung and consists of planning and executing strategies to undermine or sabotage the other party while ignoring attempts to negotiate or compromise. Limited destruction is the seventh rung and involves inflicting damage on the other party's resources, assets, or interests while accepting collateral damage or losses for yourself. Fragmentation is the eighth rung and consists of destroying the other party's identity, dignity, or existence while losing any sense of proportion or rationality. Finally, together into the abyss is the ninth rung and involves seeking mutual annihilation regardless of consequences for yourself, others, or the environment.