How can you use a human rights-based approach to negotiate conflicts?

A human rights-based approach to negotiate conflicts would mean emphasizing the following core principles: equality, dignity, and non-discrimination. Such an approach must promote open dialogue, mediation, and the rule of law as essential tools in resolving conflicts. Civil society engagement and international cooperation in promoting and upholding human rights in conflict resolution efforts will be critical because without this parties may never even come to the table. Additionally, I would underscore the importance of accountability, justice, and adherence to international human rights frameworks in negotiations, focusing on addressing the root causes of conflicts rather than short-term solutions.

The right to express yourself, and be respected for your views, even if they are not what the other person wants to hear, is surely a fundamental building block in conflict resolution. Human rights are the foundation stone of freedom and justice and democracy in any community. It's about respect for the rights of others, including their right to express their opinions. These rights apply regardless of race, religion, nationality or political positions. I believe that a human rights approach to conflict negotiation begins here.

Using a human rights-based approach to negotiate conflicts must first and foremost consider the critical role of women and girls in a community or a country. It should underscore how their value-added contributions to the betterment of the whole community, can only be achieved by ensuring their safety, security, and equal rights. Providing a safe space for women and girls as well as men and boys, to express thoughts without being judged and silenced, creates the foundation for healthy dialogue and discourse that can lead to new, creative ideas and solutions that equally serve all those in the community–without discrimination based on roles and gender.

Like Blaise Pascal said, Justice (or “Rule of Law”) and power must be brought together, so that whatever is just may be powerful, and whatever is powerful may be just". Human-rights based approach will not be efficient without power (solid defense, strong economic incentives)

Office of the Facilitators: Afro-Descendant Nation Confederated USA In the Americas the Afro-descendants are entitled to a special designation in international law under the Declaration of Santiago in the Organization of American States and in the case law of the Inter-American Court. I assure you that we in the US have assessed our situation and the human rights approach that we have decided on is an “Identity based Plebiscite”. The US is an apartheid government that practices its Apartheid regardings education, wealth eg gerrymandering, redlining, and gentrification is immune to the Civil Rights approach . We must stand up by Plebiscite and overcome its feigned democracy so that Human Rights may prevail for the Afro-descendants.

In my experience by using a Human Rights-Based Approach in community organising ensures equality, empowers marginalized groups, and fosters participation. It promotes accountability, leading to fair governance and ethical behaviour. By addressing interconnected rights and safeguarding vulnerable populations, it creates inclusive, just, and empowered communities, driving sustainable social change.

It is necessary to consider people for their abilities. To emphasize negative and discriminatory practices of the past are useless. We are living in a time when people's contributions will naturally be different. That will open our eyes to practices we may not even consider. So open up and expect the unexpected.

One thing that in modern times that we keep forgetting... it is about you and me. It is about what is good for your family and mine. Today politicians become entangled in greed and confusion. This leading to agenda. Agenda that creates friction and looses the essence of who we. Human Beings.

Needs Assessment and Participation: Engage the community to identify needs and priorities, ensuring diverse voices are heard. Program Design and Implementation: Develop initiatives based on identified rights and needs, ensuring they align with international human rights standards. Monitoring and Accountability: Establish mechanisms for regular assessment. Hold duty-bearers accountable, ensuring transparency, responsiveness, and fairness. Evaluation and Learning: Regularly evaluate the impact of programs, focusing on their effectiveness and their adherence to human rights principles. Learn from successes and challenges, adapting strategies for continuous improvement.

We may fill this page with cliche... the fundamental element is keep it human. Cater to the primal instinct and needs. Any variation creates tension and confusion in a society that lacks intellect. We know a little of everything and a lot of nothing.

We all are human and it's our first and last prime consideration to treat every human with deep humanity, what it may come? Leaving behind his or her position cast greed and the post they hold

Ground realities are the key - sometimes we have to dig deeper to discover the fundamental core concerns. Imagine it as an iceberg, 10% above the water level you see and 90% hidden under. External actions and situations often have underlying motives which provide the true catalyst of parties. Try to uncover the motives in a respectful way but this will help in any negotiations - what are the parties truly trying to achieve and what is driving them to this conflict situation. External readings often miss out on this deeper drive and we often have failed mediation as a result. Often in this analysis you have to look at value-based approach, what values do the parties subscribe to that led them to this? Find their motivation to act.

This question is based on the prevailing human rights system that was framed to protect the rights of citizens against violations by the state. In other words, international law of human rights established a vertical relation between the State and individual and therefore a human rights victim may complain that the state have directly violated their rights if an agent of the State, for example a police officer has done something wrong that led to the state responsibility. This is called the vertical application of human rights.

By the end of the cold war, non-state actors increasingly got involved in all forms of armed conflicts and as a result civilians and specially women and children were trapped in most conflicts. Not only had the conflicting parties have not abide the humanitarian norms governing the armed conflicts, but also human rights standards are being violated. Therefore, the human rights of civilians are violated in new forms of conflict and there is an urgent need to address grave violations of human rights in conflict.

Listen carefully to each party involved, showing empathy and understanding. Try to understand the emotions and perspectives of all parties. If appropriate, consider involving a neutral third party, such as a mediator. Encourage participants to identify their underlying needs and interests. Be willing to make concessions when necessary, but ensure that it's a fair and balanced process. Establish trust and credibility to create a positive atmosphere for negotiation. Maintain a respectful and civil tone throughout the negotiation, avoiding personal attacks or blame. Consider the long-term relationship and consequences of the negotiation. Once an agreement is reached, document it clearly to avoid future misunderstandings.

In addition to the steps mentioned earlier, there are several other considerations when implementing a Human Rights-Based Approach (HRBA) in various contexts: Cultural Sensitivity: Capacity Building: Legal Framework: Data and Research: Resource Allocation: Conflict Sensitivity: Partnerships: Children’s Rights: Gender Equality: Environmental Sustainability: Conflict Resolution and Reconciliation: Non-Discrimination: By considering these factors, HRBA can be implemented more comprehensively, addressing the nuanced challenges faced by communities and individuals, and ensuring a more inclusive and effective approach to human rights promotion and protection.

The steps listed sounds like an individual (organizational) action. I believe commUNITY issues are conflicts (conflicts defined as the Quality of Living I/my family expect vs the quality of living I/my family has today). This is a principal of Asset-Based Community Development (ABCD). The question, then, become: How can AI improve the dynamics of the human condition to better determine (vs discernment): 1. The true commitment of leadership and followship 2. The quality of our issue priority selections in terms of cost/benefit. What say You?