How can you resolve disagreements in responsive design code review for web applications?

Common standards and guidelines add consistency and reusability while coding which reflects in visually appealing and consistent UI. It brings everyone on same platform to avoid tech debt Think and understand guidelines first then coding will be faster and much straightforward for RWD

Good code is the code which is easy to read and understand. We can use various standards to make our code more clean & understandable: 1) Dry: Do not repeat yourself 2) Kiss : Keep it simple and stupid 3) Always write comments so that your fellow developer can understand what you are trying to implement. You can also use linters and formatters to make your code bug free and beautiful.

The first thing in resolving disagreements is to review the code not the person. If your co-worker feels that you are attacking them personally, it will be more difficult to share your viewpoint of what you believe is incorrect in the code. Second, your tone of voice and body language are louder than your words. Be respectful. Disagree with the code but be ready to explain in a cool and confident manner what you feel is the correct approach. Remember, if there are clear standards and procedures listed, you are not criticizing the person just the implementation.

It's easy to get in the development groove, and ignore the style guide. Doing so causes big issues downstream. For an experienced front-end developer, it's fairly easy to mockup a dynamic page that serves as a company style guide. Establish units and any other coding standards on that page. The longer the work is put off, the more overwhelming it gets, so, establish your conventions early, and be sure to update them immediately if you change something. I know it can feel restrictive to do this stuff early on. Just remember, you can pivot whenever you want... as long as you update your styles and standards to reflect it, immediately.

I definitely agree on the importance of code linting for front end projects given the vast array of standards and styles that they can take on (particularly if using JavaScript with its dynamic typing), and so establishing common standards and tooling is paramount for this. However, we have to be careful at the same time that we not stifle creativity and allow for some space in divergence. Not suggesting to accept lower quality by any means, but we do have to be able to honestly distinguish between some of the more pedantic aspects of coding styles and actual quality. When we take highly intelligent / talented engineers and force them to mass produce highly opinionated stylings, we can miss out on ideas / opportunities to improve the whole.

Workshops with the whole team is quintessential in resolving UI queries. Use of whiteboards and other design tools does help in bringing out the essence as well as the challenges of the end product.

A good website is the website which is looking good on every device, on every resolution. As a web developer we have to write various media queries for different devices. We can easily test these media queries on various extensions and software such as responsivley & chrome extensions. These softwares simulate various devices so that we can easily test our websites and find any type of bug in it.

Use visual tools like browser dev tools and screenshots to check how your responsive design looks on different devices. Consider user scenarios, get feedback, and ensure adaptability for a smooth experience. Test across browsers and devices, optimizing for performance.

It's the developers responsibility to use development tools like the browser devtools to make sure the product is in sync with the responsive designs given by the design team. While reviewing the finished product, the team should work together to figure out if the finished product fits to the responsive design guideline given. This could be done via - Overlay tools that will overlay a specific screen (for example the design) over the actual web viewport to compare the web view to the design - Use the devtools to compare sizes and dimensions of elements with the designs Developers should make sure that reviewers have everything they need to make the reviewing process more fluent and prevent unnecessary feedback loops.

Set clear & agreed-upon design guidelines & coding standards before initiating the review process. Having predefined criteria helps in objectively evaluating design choices & coding practices. Use examples & references to support arguments & encourage adherence to widely accepted standards. Prioritize user experience when evaluating responsive design. Focus on how the design choices impact usability across different devices & screen sizes. Emphasize the importance of intuitive navigation & readability. Ensure that the responsive design decisions contribute positively to achieving the project's objectives, such as improved engagement or conversion rates.

The best codebases are the ones that are the easiest to understand and maintain and produce the highest levels of developer joy when doing so. This should be the first priority in any codebase. Performance is a feature, and so it should be delivered as such like any other feature. Responsiveness is also a feature and must be delivered in consideration of all the other features. If the question is based on antagonism of something against performance, so long a given project is produced with the aforementioned axioms, it will naturally achieve the proper balance between <fill_in_the_blank> and performance.

In code reviews, prioritize user experience and performance in responsive design. Assess its impact on usability, accessibility, readability, and interactivity. Evaluate loading time, bandwidth and memory usage. Leverage metrics, audits, benchmarks, and analytics for continuous improvement.

Prioritize a fast, user-friendly experience. Ensure your responsive design enhances usability and minimizes loading times. Test with tools like metrics and benchmarks for optimal performance.

Developers and designers sometimes think different. This becomes a problem as soon as resource intensive elements are used in designs (like autoplaying videos in the background, expensive vector animations or filters used to change the style of an element) or even large assets like videos or images. Because of that developers and designers should keep in close sync and discuss potential performance bottlenecks before the actual development is started to find a good solution for all kind of devices and networks.

Be open to new perspectives gained from the reviews. Understand what is the nature of the feedback is and also not be afraid to give your feedback. You have to actively create a feedback loop that also discuss the scope of the future implementationand their affect and effect.

As a developer the ability to collaborate with anyone is a must. A good developer is always ready to communicate, collaborate and ready to implement new features and solve the bugs with the fellow developers.

To mitigate conflicts in code review, nurture a positive professional rapport among developers and reviewers. Show respect and foster collaboration throughout the process, acknowledging and appreciating each peer's efforts. Promptly address conflicts or misunderstandings that may arise, fostering open communication. When expressing opinions and suggestions, maintain a polite and constructive tone. Embrace flexibility, remaining open to diverse perspectives and solutions in the realm of responsive design.

In the code review process, respect your peers' efforts, acknowledge contributions, and maintain open communication. Collaborate politely, resolving conflicts constructively. Be flexible, appreciating different perspectives for responsive design solutions.

Development teams must remember that feedback is not a negative thing and is necessary to actually grow. This is important not only for the developers but also designers and even testers. The team should be sensitized for feedback and if necessary should take workshops about good communication in a work environment to make sure to not accidentially bring personal issues into a work related topic.

Firstly, You have to recognize code reviews as a learning opportunity to understand different perspectives and improve the quality of your code. Secondly, Encourage open dialogue and evaluation during code reviews to discuss disagreements and learn from each other's viewpoints. Don't be too smart and eager to show that you're right! Thirdly, Implement the changes based on constructive feedback to continuously improve the code and the team's skills. Lastly, Foster a culture of continuous learning and improvement to address disagreements and enhance the overall development process. These are the necessary steps you can consider that can help you in code review.

The first important thing is: Actually do code reviews. Code reviews are meaningless if the code is just quickly scanned over and not actually read in context. The code reviewer should understand the code, ask if code is not understandable for clarification and add good and understandable feedback to code change requests to make avoid unnecessary communication loops. The developer should take the code review as normal feedback and understand why code changes are requested or disputed. It's not a bad thing and open discourse and communication can help both sides becoming better developers.

Learning and improvement from the code review process involve embracing feedback constructively, understanding different perspectives, and incorporating valuable insights into future design decisions. It requires a mindset of continuous learning, where developers view code reviews not just as critiques but as opportunities to enhance their skills, foster collaboration, and align with best practices. Emphasizing a culture of iteration and adaptation, team members can collectively learn from both successful implementations and identified areas for improvement, contributing to ongoing growth and refinement of the responsive design approach in web applications.

View code reviews as a chance to learn and grow in responsive design. Use feedback to identify and fix issues, applying lessons to future projects. Turn the review process into a valuable opportunity for skill enhancement.

Communication is the key to building a scalable, maintainable, reliable, efficient and consistent code. It’s important to code to pre-defined design patterns and build a common language for all developers to understand and follow. Utilize multiple communication channels and establish ground rules keeping in but the end goal. Ensure that your aim is always to educate and empower the team to move towards common goal. You can achieve these by various methods utilizing PR templates, linters, code scans etc.,

Consider embracing a collaborative mindset, fostering a culture where team members freely exchange ideas and insights. Share success stories and challenges faced during responsive design implementations. Encourage a supportive environment that values continuous learning, allowing developers to adapt and innovate. By fostering open communication, teams can overcome disagreements and collectively elevate the quality of responsive design projects.