How can you make QA reports more actionable for game development?

Summarize Clearly: Start with a concise summary of main findings. Prioritize Issues: Highlight critical problems for immediate attention. Reproducibility Steps: Provide detailed steps to reproduce each issue. Visual Aids: Include screenshots or videos to illustrate problems. System Information: Specify the platform, device, or environment details.

clearly categorize and prioritize issues, provide detailed steps to reproduce, include screenshots or videos for visual clarity, and offer insights on potential impact. Additionally, collaborate closely with the development team to ensure a shared understanding of issues and solutions, fostering effective communication and quicker resolution of identified problems.

Just like any reports, your QA report should be as simple as possible in the sense that, it provides you with all the information that is needed with relevant aids like videos or photos.

Whether it's enhancing user experience, optimizing game performance, or addressing specific issues, having well-defined goals ensures that QA reports provide actionable insights tailored to the development team's priorities. This strategic approach not only streamlines the QA process but also empowers developers to address key aspects, ultimately contributing to a more efficient and effective game development cycle.

Scope the battlefield: Define which areas of the game are under scrutiny, from core mechanics to pixel polish. Don't try to conquer everything at once! Prioritize the generals: Rank bugs like stars on a helmet: critical issues first, minor annoyances later. Let developers know what needs immediate attention. Set the acceptance bar: How high is the victory flag? Define clear criteria for when a bug is truly squashed, leaving no room for ambiguity. Format your phalanx: Bullet points, screenshots, even video evidence – equip your report with the tools it needs to be clear, concise, and impactful.

Use precise and common nomenclature shared across the testing and development teams, which can be defined through a glossary. In the reports documentation, it is a good practice to enable tools to point out issues with a high level of specificity, leaving no room for ambiguity for those interpreting the report. For example, UI/Deck Builder/Card Information Popup/short_description. This ensures that the identified problem is easy to locate and reproduce.

When preparing a QA report, it is very important to write with empathy for the person who will read it. For example, if a bug is to be reported and you are going to convey it to the developer, you should write it just like setting up an algorithm. After saying "Steps to reproduce", you should indicate which actions should be taken step by step. For instance, if you are going to write about the difficulty of the level instead of a technical issue, you should write from a player's perspective; detailing at which stage you struggled, what is the main reason players will struggle at this level, and how you suggest it be changed.

As simple as the language in the report it will be more understandable the issues. Make sure if your are using technical terms you have to make sure that explains it well. You should use clear and precise language that describes the issue, the expected and actual results.

It is crucial to develop a unified terminology that will be understandable to all participants in the process. In this way, you can establish transparent communication, which will contribute to achieving a more predictable and high-quality outcome.

Relevant and accurate information in the report important aspect. You should avoid irrelevant or redundant information. You should also verify that the information you provide is accurate, up-to-date. All the details are mentioned in report clearly.

Do not ignore the visual confirmation of detected bugs even if description & repeating steps seems so simple & logically clear. 1. Each tech expert is still a human which interact with product & run the unit tests use UI for be sure in fix too. Additionally each who do fixing bugs can by the way find the new testing script based on visual example at the any moment. 2. The visual confirmation is excludes the misunderstandings or don't trusting in some cases(obviously if you're fresh in the team). 3. Anything have a lot of changes every day (product, team, your memory). You can create ticket & forget about sense inside it at end of the sprint ?? At one time I begin use GIFs for recording issues, and all teammates use this format so well! ??

This can save the time of developers as they can attend to an issue based on how critical the issue is. Is it too critical that it has to be attended at the earliest or can it be attended later as it won't affect the player experience. Classifying it this way and prioritising the issue can help save time and resources for work that has higher priority.

Prioritize the issues in the report are equally important or urgent. Use a consistent and transparent system to rank the issues by their severity, frequency, and impact on the gameplay. This will help developers to focus on the most critical and relevant issues, and avoid wasting time or resources on minor or low-priority issues.

Suggestion and solutions are mentioned in the report to use of your knowledge and experience to solve the issues. Should also provide feedback on the design, functionality, or usability of the game, and recommend any changes or enhancements that may improve the gameplay.

Once the issue has been attended to, the next step is follow-up. You have to communicate clearly to the developer team, what changes were made and how it affected other mechanics. Recheck the issue and give positive feedback and appreciation will help build trust which will help improve communication.

From a developer's perspective, your bugs should be sorted and prioritized by relevance, include screen shots or video, be concise with repro steps, be verified with a recent build, and be based on requirements not just subjective opinion.

Let's not skip the smaller, simpler technicalities in a bug report as well. Identifying a bug is already a big step but reproducing it and providing clear reproduction steps is probably the MOST important aspect of a good QA report. I feel like unless that step is there for everything in your report, it's not gonna be helpful almost at all.