Grading is a crucial part of teaching, but it can also be a source of stress and anxiety for both students and instructors. How can you design a grading system that is fair, transparent, and respectful of the diverse needs and backgrounds of your students? Here are some tips to help you create a more inclusive grading system for your students.
Before you assign grades, you need to have a clear idea of what you want your students to learn and how you will measure their progress. Learning objectives are statements that describe the specific knowledge, skills, and attitudes that your students should achieve by the end of your course or unit. They should be aligned with the course content, the level of difficulty, and the expectations of your discipline. Learning objectives also help you communicate your expectations to your students and provide feedback on their performance.
To create an inclusive grading system: Use clear criteria. Diversify assessments. Allow flexible deadlines. Accommodate students' needs. Provide detailed rubrics. Offer constructive feedback. Consider grade averaging options. Normalize grades. Include self and peer assessments. Be culturally sensitive. Hold regular check-ins. Establish a fair appeal process.
The primary learning objective is to gain a deep understanding of your students' demographics, backgrounds, and personal experiences, including their life stories. This is essential because, at times, they may harbor apprehensions or negative sentiments toward certain academic subjects, stemming from past negative encounters with different teaching methodologies. These prior experiences can create barriers that impede the assessment process.
In my experience as a teacher, creating a more inclusive grading system for students involves considering their diverse needs and abilities. I would advise that you should use multiple assessment methods, a variety of assessment methods, such as written assignments, presentations, projects, and group work. This allows students to demonstrate their understanding and skills in different ways, accommodating different learning styles and abilities. Use clear grading criteria. Remember, creating an inclusive grading system requires ongoing reflection, flexibility, and a commitment to meeting the diverse needs of your students.
'Assessment' means to sit with. As a course leader, I introduced a system of assessment where the students sat with my colleagues throughout the assessment process, and they were asked to use the language used in grading criteria, subsequently student and assessor agreed the grades.
In my view, creating a more inclusive grading system entails being transparent about grading criteria, offering diverse assessment methods, and providing flexible accommodations for students facing challenges. It's important to consider alternative assessments, flexible deadlines, and accommodations for students with disabilities. Constructive feedback, opportunities for revision, and grading on mastery can also help foster inclusivity. Peer and self-assessment, culturally responsive teaching, and regular reviews to adjust the system are essential in promoting a fair and equitable learning environment for all students. It's crucial to consult with experts and offer training to faculty to ensure inclusivity in grading practices.
Grading criteria are the standards that you use to evaluate your students' work and assign grades. They should be based on your learning objectives and reflect the essential elements of quality and mastery in your discipline. Grading criteria can be expressed as rubrics, checklists, scales, or descriptors that specify the levels of performance and the points or grades associated with each level. Grading criteria should be consistent, transparent, and accessible to your students. They should also be flexible enough to accommodate different types of assignments and modes of expression.
I believe it's crucial to think outside the conventional grading criteria, which often rely on letter grades, numerical scores, or a simple pass/fail system. Instead, we should aim for something more reflective of what students will encounter in the professional work environment. In many cases, the grading criteria they're accustomed to in school or university won't be mirrored in their future workplaces. Some supervisors may not even offer private compliments. As educators, it's our responsibility to empower students to self-assess and collaborate in creating grading criteria that help them recognize their own progress and performance improvement. This shift can be valuable in preparing them for the realities of the professional world.
Absolutely, shifting away from traditional grades is central to my teaching approach. I prioritize progress over grades, encouraging students to iterate on assignments through feedback, fostering self-reflection and continuous improvement. I also model this by implementing their feedback to refine the course, showing that learning never stops. In my assignments, self-evaluation is key, asking students to consider the challenges they've encountered and how their learning applies to future scenarios. Additionally, I've renamed grade levels to inspire ambition—for instance, an A+ is 'Elite', nudging students to exceed the standard and strive for excellence, mirroring the ongoing development they'll experience in their careers.
?Give them a detailed rubrics criteria for each session of the assignment to improve their quality of the work. ?Consider the students who are below pass mark for 1st & 2nd moderation grading. ?Allow them to resist the assignment based on the feedback given by the professor for those who failed even after the moderation grading with exact submission date and time. ?Consider the types of assignments to improve their skills and learning development such as 'Assignments'(pdf format, describe the max.word count, reference criteria etc),Presentation(pptx, either adding voice recording/oral). ?Oral presentation helps the students to improve their presentation style, subject knowledge & develop skills to impress the audience & gain the confident.
In devising grading criteria, balance is key. For instance, rubrics that delineate expectations can clarify grading but may stifle creativity if too rigid. My approach has been a flexible rubric, rewarding analytical depth as well as creativity. This caters to varied student approaches—some excel in structured assignments, others in innovative projects. It's vital to communicate that all work is judged equitably. One pitfall to avoid is over-complication; criteria should be comprehensive yet digestible to prevent confusion. Consistency in application ensures that students trust the grading system, recognising it as a tool for fair assessment and personal development.
Formative assessment is the process of gathering and using information about your students' learning during the course to provide feedback, guidance, and support. Formative assessment can help you monitor your students' progress, identify their strengths and weaknesses, and adjust your teaching strategies accordingly. Formative assessment can also help your students self-regulate their learning, identify their goals and gaps, and improve their skills and confidence. Formative assessment can take various forms, such as quizzes, polls, reflections, peer reviews, or portfolios. Formative assessment should be frequent, constructive, and aligned with your learning objectives and grading criteria.
Incorporating formative assessment can be challenging due to large student populations and the reluctance of students to give objective peer reviews. Portfolios are favored as they showcase work to a new audience, aiding career readiness. However, formative assessment is time-consuming for teachers, and artificial intelligence can make data analysis more efficient. Despite tech help, personal connections with students remain vital for guidance and support, preserving the humanistic aspect of education.
Incorporating formative assessment offers a dynamic gauge of student understanding. I've seen the success of regular quizzes that provide instant feedback, enabling students to identify knowledge gaps early. However, reliance on such tools alone may overlook deeper learning issues. Combining quizzes with reflective exercises allows for a more nuanced understanding of student progress. It’s crucial that these assessments align with the learning objectives and inform the final grading criteria. One challenge is ensuring that formative feedback is timely and constructive, fostering an environment where students are motivated to act on the feedback and not just view it as a preliminary score.
Grades should be given based on real time problem solving capabilities. Along with tests should not be the same for all. We should plan tests as per the interests and specialization of students.
Diversity and equity are key principles of inclusive teaching that recognize and value the different backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives of your students. To embrace these values in your grading system, you should acknowledge and respect the diverse ways of learning, communicating, and expressing knowledge that your students may have. Additionally, provide multiple and varied opportunities for your students to demonstrate their learning and receive feedback. You should also use inclusive and culturally responsive language and examples in your assignments and grading criteria. Furthermore, avoid grading on participation or attendance without considering the reasons and circumstances that may affect your students' engagement or presence. Finally, seek feedback from your students and colleagues on your grading system and make adjustments as needed.
One way to embrace diversity and equity in your grading system is to offer flexible assessment options that cater to different learning styles and abilities. For example, you could allow students to choose from a range of assignment formats, such as essays, presentations, or multimedia projects, so they can select the method that best suits their strengths and preferences. By providing these choices, you respect the diverse ways of learning and communicating among your students.
Equity in terms of attention students receive from the instructor. In typical grading schemes, As and Fs are relatively obvious and more assessment energy is given to students' work along letter grade boundaries, both at the time of review and in conversations with students wanting to discuss those grades. In contrast, ungrading and emphasizing feedback over point allocation makes it easier to evenly distribute time spent on reviewing. Having multiple channels for students to get feedback is helpful too. I used to do a poor job of timely feedback on assignments and spend a lot of my time with students in office hours. It was more fun and felt more productive, but in hindsight, clearly favored students who had the capacity to attend.
To grade inclusively, offer varied assessment types, respecting diverse learning and expression styles. Use assignments that allow for cultural context, and ensure language in grading criteria does not disadvantage any group. Be flexible with participation grades, considering individual circumstances. Regularly seek feedback on your grading system, ready to adapt for equity. This approach not only assesses but also values the rich tapestry of student backgrounds.
Communication is essential for creating a more inclusive grading system for your students. Communication can help you build trust, rapport, and understanding with your students and foster a positive learning environment. Communication can also help you clarify your expectations, explain your grading criteria, and provide feedback on your students' work. Communication can take various forms, such as syllabi, rubrics, announcements, emails, or conferences. Communication should be clear, timely, and respectful. Communication should also invite dialogue, questions, and feedback from your students and address their concerns and challenges.
Consider using multiple means for assessing learning.This is one way to embrace diversity and appeal to students' learning preferences.Empower students by providing choices.Students may choose to respond to assignment prompts in the form of a written report, oral report, multi-media presentation or other ways. The instructor should provide clear guidelines for completing the assignment and the grading criteria, e.g., checklists and rubrics.
Clear, timely communication is vital for an inclusive grading system. Explain criteria and provide constructive feedback through multiple channels, like emails, LMS announcements, or messages. This openness invites student dialogue, ensuring they understand how their work is assessed and allowing them to voice concerns—a vital step in fostering a supportive educational environment. However, don't forget that over-communication can overwhelm.
Running for city council in Helsinki #219 | Entrepreneurial Mindset at Aalto University
It is always a good idea to think whether you really should grade in more detail than pass/fail or satisfactory/unsatisfactory. Most people assumes that number or letter grading is more motivating. However, top universities like Harvard and Aalto have tested pass/fail grading with great learning outcomes. Just check out David J Malan’s videos and and writing about grading in CS50.