Collecting feedback from training participants can be done in a variety of ways, each with their own benefits and drawbacks. Surveys are simple to create, distribute, and analyze, and they can supply quantitative and qualitative data; however, they may lead to low response rates, biased answers, or shallow feedback. Interviews are more personal, interactive, and comprehensive; however, they require a lot of time and money, and it’s difficult to make them standardized or comparable. Focus groups are similar to interviews but involve a group of participants discussing their feedback together; they can generate diverse and dynamic feedback as well as peer learning but can be hard to organize, moderate, and summarize. Observations are great for assessing the behavior, performance, and engagement of the participants during the training; they can provide objective and direct feedback but may be influenced by the observer's bias or interpretation. Tests are great for measuring the knowledge, skills, or attitudes of the participants before and after the training; they can provide quantifiable and comparable feedback but may be stressful or irrelevant for certain learning objectives.