登录查看更多内容

Last updated on 2024年6月3日

Here's how you can debunk common misconceptions about logical reasoning in higher education.

由人工智能和领英社区提供技术支持

Logical reasoning is a critical skill in higher education, yet it's often shrouded in misconceptions. It's essential to clarify these misunderstandings to enhance your critical thinking abilities and academic performance. Logical reasoning isn't about being naturally smart; it's a skill that can be developed. It's not restricted to philosophy or mathematics; it applies to all disciplines. Moreover, it's not just about formal arguments; it encompasses a wide range of informal reasoning skills. By debunking these myths, you can embrace logical reasoning as a valuable tool for your academic journey.

此文章中的业界达人

由社区从 8 条内容中精选。了解更多

Alexandre Nicolini

Especialista em gest?o acadêmica e avalia??o da aprendizagem no ensino superior.
Prof (Dr.) Ghanshyam

Chairman Career Development Centre @BIT Sindri |Training and Placement Officer @BIT Sindri| Senior Administrative…

1 Misconception 1

Many believe that logical reasoning is an innate ability that one either possesses or doesn't. This is a misconception; logical reasoning is a skill that can be honed with practice. Just as you can improve at a sport or an instrument through consistent effort, you can enhance your logical reasoning abilities by engaging in exercises and activities designed to challenge your critical thinking. This includes solving puzzles, debating, and analyzing arguments critically. With dedication, your capacity for logical reasoning will grow over time.

添加您的观点

Alexandre Nicolini

Especialista em gest?o acadêmica e avalia??o da aprendizagem no ensino superior.
举报内容
Raciocínio lógico é uma habilidade que pode ser construída com treinamento, especialmente se você trabalhar com situa??es práticas, construindo rela??es de causa e efeito. O objetivo n?o é conseguir respostas certas, mas a capacidade de conduzir o pensamento de forma coerente em busca de respostas - que podem ser muitas.

已翻译

赞
Dr. Mohsin Syed

Director Of Digital Media at B.S.Abdur Rahman University (Formerly Crescent Engineering College)
(已编辑)
举报内容
There are 3 Misconceptions about Logical Reasoning..... 1. You have to be very Logical and Rational in your Approach! Fact: Action gives you the Results... No matter if you come up with a BRILLIANT Idea! If Action is not taken on it, then it will yield "Zero Result" 2. You must have Belief in your Actions... Fact: Firm Belief can move Mountains! 3. Consistency is the Key to Success... Fact: Consistent Results require consistent Efforts!

已翻译

赞
Bashir Osmat, Ph.D

Analyst @ Government Expenditure & Projects Efficiency Authority | Strategic planning, Social advisory
举报内容
Is logical thinking in higher education what teachers strive for; But logical thinking is not learned from one book. It is complete knowledge that can only be gathered by logical thinking. The truth is that logical thinking is not written in books, it is not acquired by memorization, but rather by practice, experience, and knowledge from books, and it is the common denominator between mathematics, geography, literature, and chess... There are logic sciences and university degrees in this specialty. Logic is closely linked to broad and deep knowledge and experience, to critical thought and to rejecting the absolute self-evident conviction of axioms.

已翻译

赞

2 Misconception 2

Another common misconception is that logical reasoning is only relevant to fields like philosophy or mathematics. In reality, this skill is crucial across all disciplines in higher education. Whether you are studying history, engineering, or literature, the ability to reason logically allows you to construct coherent arguments, evaluate evidence, and make informed decisions. Understanding the universal relevance of logical reasoning can empower you to apply it more broadly in your academic pursuits.

添加您的观点

Alexandre Nicolini

Especialista em gest?o acadêmica e avalia??o da aprendizagem no ensino superior.
举报内容
Raciocínio lógico está na base de todas as carreiras universitárias que lidem, por exemplo, com procedimentos operacionais. Eles s?o fundamentais para organizar e sequenciar tarefas, objetivando a solu??o eficiente de problemas. Na base de qualquer algoritmo, fluxograma ou procedimento previsto haverá uma rela??o de causa e efeito, e consequentemente, raciocínio lógico.

已翻译

赞

3 Misconception 3

Some students assume that logical reasoning is solely about formal logic and structured argumentation. However, logical reasoning also includes a wide array of informal reasoning skills such as problem-solving, decision-making, and the ability to analyze everyday situations. It involves the capacity to discern fallacies, understand implications, and draw sound conclusions . Recognizing the scope of logical reasoning beyond formal logic can enhance your analytical abilities in real-world contexts.

添加您的观点

Alexandre Nicolini

Especialista em gest?o acadêmica e avalia??o da aprendizagem no ensino superior.
举报内容
Um profissional que consiga pensar de forma lógica consegue desempenhar melhor sua profiss?o diante dos problemas que nela se apresentarem, pois s?o capazes de elaborar hipóteses e diagnósticos fundamentados tanto na observa??o do problema quanto na fundamenta??o científica, buscando as condutas profissionais tradicionais ou inovadoras com chances maiores de sucesso.

已翻译

赞

4 Misconception 4

It's often thought that logical reasoning leads to one correct answer, but this is not always the case. In many situations, especially within higher education, logical reasoning can lead to multiple plausible solutions or interpretations . The goal is not simply to find the 'right' answer but to use logical processes to support your conclusions effectively. This understanding helps in developing a more nuanced approach to problem-solving and argumentation.

添加您的观点

Alexandre Nicolini

Especialista em gest?o acadêmica e avalia??o da aprendizagem no ensino superior.
举报内容
Na forma??o de profissionais competentes, deve-se considerar que nunca há uma resposta ideal no processo de ensino-aprendizagem. O curso de a??o depende do contexto onde se localizam os problemas e das premissas utilizadas para analisá-lo. Um bom profissional deve ser ensinado a pensar de muitas maneiras e assumir os riscos inerentes a cada decis?o.

已翻译

赞

5 Misconception 5

A prevalent misconception is that emotions have no place in logical reasoning. While it's true that reasoning should be objective, emotions can provide valuable insights into our values and perspectives. They can act as a catalyst for further investigation and critical analysis. By acknowledging the role of emotions in reasoning , you can develop a more holistic approach that considers both logical and emotional aspects when evaluating arguments and making decisions.

添加您的观点

Alexandre Nicolini

Especialista em gest?o acadêmica e avalia??o da aprendizagem no ensino superior.
举报内容
Os problemas que se localizam na fronteira do conhecimento humano trazem um desafio insuperável, que é a mitiga??o dos riscos quando é necessário adotar um curso de a??o. Quando n?o temos todas as informa??es disponíveis, a conex?o afetiva com o objeto de estudo que se contrói pela experiência acumulada pode ser uma bússola importante para os profissionais. N?o se trata de adivinha??o, mas de acreditar que a intui??o pode indicar os caminhos mais prováveis.

已翻译

赞

6 Misconception 6

Finally, there is a belief that logical reasoning is a solitary activity, but collaboration often enhances it. Engaging with peers in discussions and debates can expose you to different viewpoints and reasoning styles, which can refine your own logical skills. Collaborative learning environments encourage the exchange of ideas and foster a deeper understanding of logical principles. Embrace opportunities for group work and dialogue to further develop your logical reasoning skills.

添加您的观点

Prof (Dr.) Ghanshyam

Chairman Career Development Centre @BIT Sindri |Training and Placement Officer @BIT Sindri| Senior Administrative Officer @BIT Sindri |Member Secretary SIRTDO @ BIT Sindri | Professor| PhD in Plasma Physics @IIT Delhi
举报内容
An educator's view Collaboration improves logical reasoning, as I've seen as an educator. Logical thinking is often thought to be lonely, yet I've discovered that talking to peers improves it. I encourage group work and discussion in my classroom. Exposure to other opinions and reasoning styles challenges people to examine their own beliefs, consider alternate perspectives, and have more complex debates. This collaborative learning environment helps students think critically, analyse material from many perspectives, and understand reasoning. They learn to think, reason, and problem-solve interactively as well as the material. I've found that this collaborative method develops logical reasoning, communication, teamwork, and adaptability.

已翻译

赞

7 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

添加您的观点

Higher Education

+ 关注

给文章评分

我们借助人工智能创建了此文章。您认为这篇文章怎么样？

很棒不太好

举报此文章

查看全部

Here's how you can debunk common misconceptions about logical reasoning in higher education.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 Misconception 1

2 Misconception 2

3 Misconception 3

4 Misconception 4

5 Misconception 5

6 Misconception 6

7 Here’s what else to consider

Higher Education

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

更多Higher Education相关文章

更多相关阅读内容

Here's how you can debunk common misconceptions about logical reasoning in higher education.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 Misconception 1

2 Misconception 2

3 Misconception 3

4 Misconception 4

5 Misconception 5

6 Misconception 6

7 Here’s what else to consider

Higher Education

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

查看其他技能