Here's how you can balance productivity and quality in business innovation.

Doing things right the first time is one of the most productive ways to work. Improving production processes, increasing maintenance efficiency, and using effective ways to boost quality will all positively impact operational performance. Producing without quality only adds cost (directly or indirectly).

To balance productivity and quality in business innovation: 1. Set Clear Goals: Define specific objectives for both productivity and quality. 2. Implement Efficient Processes: Streamline workflows to maximize efficiency without sacrificing quality. 3. Prioritize Key Metrics: Focus on metrics that reflect both productivity and quality. 4. Foster a Collaborative Environment: Encourage teamwork to enhance both speed and standards. 5. Regular Reviews: Continuously assess and adjust strategies to maintain the balance between productivity and quality.

To improve culture is needed tools. 5S, Autonomous Maintenance, Planned Mainteance, Early Equipment Activities, Quality Circles and right first time approaches should be helpful.

If you do any work with full dedication, be it engineering or medical, that work will definitely be successful. 1st you will be start work then result isn't your hand but hard work and dedication in your hand so all buissness and every work are based on your pureness

focus on giving team members the autonomy to make decisions and encouraging a collaborative environment. By providing clear objectives and trusting their expertise, I’ve seen how it boosts morale and drives creativity. For example, during a recent project, I set the vision and allowed the team to determine the best approach. Regular check-ins ensured alignment without micromanagement. This approach not only leverages diverse skills but also instills a sense of ownership and accountability, leading to higher engagement and better outcomes.

One thing I found helpful was challenging team members on an ongoing basis. Empowering to make failures as acceptable with quick recovery. Ensuring that delivery is coming both from individual contribution with team collaboration. Encouraging leading with accountability. Working together as team and collaborating well with cross teams. Make empathy, trust, confidence, commitment as pillars and build & deliver things iteratively. Make quality delivery as team culture.

Utilizar métodos como o microlearning para viabilizar e facilitar o aprendizado, é um caminho para empoderar as equipes com o conhecimento necessário. Além disso, é importante disponibilizar os recursos para esse aprendizado.

Productivity doesn’t exist without quality. It may seem at first, that it is possible to sacrifice quality, only to find out later, that the impact on sales is drastic. Whenever there’s a new production line to be studied, the key factor is to provide a consistent description of the current process and its output. Then start brainstorming with the team: 1) are these processes leading to the targeted quality? Why and why not? 2) if we took out any steps, how would we impact quality? 3) if we changed the equipment / number of people / KPI, what difference would it make ( good or bad)? 4) How would we better serve our customers if we made “this particular change“ in the process? Key success factor: customer in mind always

The best way to identify bottleneck related workfkow is Value Stream Mapping. In this way you can identify workflow bottleneck and using pareto analysis and/or 6M methodology you can simplify workflow and processes. Sure PDCA with RACI matrix can be helpful tobrealize actions after VSM, 6M etc...

I focus on identifying bottlenecks and simplifying workflows. This involves mapping out current processes, pinpointing inefficiencies, and implementing lean methodologies. For instance, automating repetitive tasks and integrating collaborative tools can reduce time waste and enhance team coordination. Streamlined processes not only boost productivity but also ensure that quality is maintained by minimizing errors and freeing up time for more strategic, high-value activities. This approach has consistently led to better project outcomes in my experience.

set clear, quantifiable goals from the outset and KPIs to track progress. Regularly reviewing these metrics allows us to assess the impact of our innovations and make necessary adjustments. For instance, when launching a new product, I monitor customer feedback, sales data, and market penetration. This data-driven approach helps us understand what works, what doesn't, and where we can improve. By consistently measuring outcomes, we can validate our strategies and ensure continuous improvement.

In addition to measuring KPIs, conducting periodic peer reviews and feedback sessions can offer qualitative insights into team performance. This can highlight areas for improvement and encourage a culture of continuous learning and accountability, which complements the quantitative data.

Innovation triggers when the critical processes are stable; production, quality, and maintenance teams are working on industrial experiments; a work culture of continuous learning from a changing world; and a visionary challenge to tackle. Cross-functional teams think at macro level of job delivery, exchange their previous experiences and customize or innovate a new problem-solving model to reach a common goal to celebrate.

O Fomento da criatividade é de fato essencial para a inova??o de alta qualidade. Utilize o método SCAMPER acr?nimo de substituir, combinar, adaptar, modificar (ou ampliar), propor, eliminar (ou minimizar), reorganizar para estimular a criatividade do seu time. Promova e organize hackathons internos onde equipes de diferentes departamentos possam colaborar para resolver problemas específicos ou criar novos produtos em um curto período de tempo. Tais métodos certamente contribuíram para novos olhares da equipe em rumo aos projetos de inova??o.

There is an adage either attributed to Yiddish folk lore or Albert Einstein. It goes something like” The answer is irrelevant, it is the question that is important. I believe this applies here. Quality is about providing a product the meets the specifications/agreement between the customer & producer. Anything that does not meet that description is waste, all expenses necessary to produce that product , direct , indirect, and handling of the non conforming product is avoidable cost. The question is not about cost or quality it about getting the customer needs designed into the specifications & making it to meet the middle of that target!