Dealing with a recurring bug in your mobile app. Are you ready to tackle the challenge head-on?

?? Here ?? ??. Identify the Bug: Gather user reports and logs to pinpoint the issue's specifics. ???. Reproduce the Issue : Create a controlled environment to replicate the bug consistently. ????. Analyze the Code : Review relevant code sections to understand potential causes. ??. Consult Documentation : Check libraries and frameworks for known issues or updates. ????. Implement a Fix : Develop a solution based on your findings, ensuring it addresses the root cause. ??. Test Thoroughly : Conduct unit and integration tests to verify the fix and avoid regressions. ????. Monitor Post-Release : After deployment, keep an eye on user feedback and analytics for any signs of recurrence.

Once you can reproduce a bug it is (usually) pretty easy to fix. The trick is nailing those reproducible steps. Once you've squashed that bug, write a test that covers the use case so it never rears its ugly head again.

Agree. Reproduction of the bug is necessary to fix that asap.Need to identify the particular usecases of the bug. Then finding solution becomes easier.

A recurring bug is an ideal candidate to add to your automated script for MRs. The steps listed are required to identify and fix the bug the first time, but if its recurring (more than 1 developer causing it), it easier to catch it in MR or prevent it using a review process.

Investigate Thoroughly: Conduct a deep analysis to identify the root cause of the bug. Replicate the Issue: Reproduce the bug consistently to understand its conditions. Collaborate with Team: Work closely with developers, testers, and UX designers to brainstorm solutions. Prioritize Fixes: Allocate resources to address the bug promptly, considering its impact on users. Test Extensively: Ensure rigorous testing across different devices and scenarios after implementing the fix. Monitor Post-Fix: Keep an eye on the app's performance to ensure the bug is resolved and doesn't reoccur.

Use logcat for android apps and for ios apps , use configurator 2 and Xcode. Also navigate the code section of that recurring bug.

CI/CD Quality is so often a discussion about what you can afford. What can you afford or are prepared to pay for or put up with. An Aston Martin Lagonda or a DB7 ? In the early phase of development Lagonda quality is probably good enough . As you scale and understand what it is you are building for who and why and more people agree , one's eyes become set on DB7. Spending money on full test coverage and other non functional investments are made as a trade off to adding that next miracle feature that will surely bring the next uptick in happy users. But at what cost ? Unhappy users? A busy support inbox? Automated software pipelines , Continuius Integration/Continuous Deployment are the nirvana How much, is an executive order .

Sometimes, the reported bug is not an actual bug in the code, but unpredicted or unanticipated user behavior resulting in a disruption. In that case, user feedback is critical. This is because the issue did not occur during the coding process, but rather during the design phase or even during the initial requirement gathering stage.

Puede que una librería haya dejado de funcionar o no se haya implementado correctamente. Es interesante comentar tus errores con Chatgpt para que te ofrezca soluciones rápidas. Pero la mitad de las veces plataformas como Stack Overflow entre otras te van a dar mejor feedback de lo que le ocurre a tu código. Ten en cuenta de que lo que te haya ocurrido casi seguro que ya le ha ocurrido a otra persona y esta solucionado.

Once the problematic code is identified, refactor it to eliminate the bug. Refactoring may involve rewriting parts of the code to be cleaner, simpler, and more efficient, thereby reducing the likelihood of the bug reappearing. It's crucial during this phase to adhere to coding standards and best practices to ensure that the new code is maintainable and scalable.

Properly executed refactoring can lead to improved performance, readability, and maintainability, ultimately resulting in more robust software. However, developers must approach this process with caution, as it can inadvertently introduce new bugs. Therefore, a careful strategy that includes testing and validation is vital to ensure that code improvements do not compromise existing functionality.

By extending testing beyond the immediate area of the fix and incorporating a variety of testing methods—including regression, performance, security, and user acceptance testing—developers can ensure that the overall functionality and quality of the application are maintained. This multifaceted testing approach not only helps catch any potential issues but also protects against the re-emergence of previously resolved bugs.

Recurring bug needs to be verified from more than one angle and procedure(steps to be reproduce). Preferring to analyse the code or examine the app via other influence for the bug to reoccur (Root cause analysis). The bug may reoccur based on device , user, role specifications.

Post-deployment, continuously monitor the application using analytics and real-time logging tools to ensure that the bug does not reoccur. Set up alerts for anomalies that might indicate the bug’s return or new issues arising from the recent changes. Regularly review performance metrics and user feedback to stay ahead of any potential problems. This ongoing vigilance helps maintain the quality and reliability of the app over time.

Each time you deliver a feature or a bug fix, make sure to monitor this by using Firebase Analytics, Sentry, Google Analytics, DataDog. Try to make some notifications systems, so when a issue arise or your bug is fixed, to get a notification when something happens. This ensures that you are on top of everything.