You're trying to solve a complex problem. What are some common mistakes you should avoid?

These are the steps that have served me well: 1. Historical analysis - exactly when did the problem begin? 2. Talk to the machine’s operator - no one knows the pulse of a machine better than the operator. 3. A machine may not present with a problem. What were the critical operating parameters at the time the problem started? This may help determine if the source is operational, mechanical or environmental. 4. Be careful not to perform static testing when the problem can only be detected dynamically. 5. Avoid removing components for independent testing. Take a hydraulic pump for example. High inlet restriction and excessive case pressure are usually caused by external factors. 6. Cold oil will mask leakage.

One common mistake is to apply solutions before fully understanding the issue. It's like?attempting to bandage a wound without first cleansing it. Rather, stand back and carefully examine the problem. Make inquiries, compile information, and take into account many viewpoints. This will assist you in determining the underlying problem and creating a more potent remedy. Recall that the first step in coming up with the best answer is spending enough time understanding the issue.

Here's a breakdown of common mistakes to avoid when tackling complex problems: 1. Poor Problem Definition: Take the time to clearly define the problem and its impact. Rushing leads to ineffective solutions. 2. Jumping to Solutions: It's tempting to fix things quickly but resist the urge to jump to the first idea. Explore multiple solutions for the best outcome. 3. Ignoring Root Causes: Don't just treat the symptoms of the problem. Dig deeper to uncover the underlying cause for a lasting solution. 4. Working in Isolation: Get input and ideas from others. Diverse perspectives can lead to breakthrough solutions you might miss alone. 5. Giving Up Too Soon: Complex problems take time, experimentation, and resilience. Don't get setbacks soon.

Keep an open mind. Too many people believe their own bs. Don't overlook the other guys passion and emotion. Understand your audience and be able to pivot.

First, don't rush without a plan. It's like building a LEGO castle without instructions. Second, avoid ignoring advice from others. It's like skipping the tutorial in a new video game. Third, don't stick to just one idea. It's like using only one color for a big painting. Fourth, skipping the details can lead to mistakes. It's like forgetting to tie your shoes before running. Fifth, not checking your work is a big no-no. It's like not saving your game progress. Avoiding these mistakes is like having a map in a maze. It helps you find the treasure without getting lost.

Adopter une stratégie, c’est aussi prendre en considération les retours. Notamment lors de la mise en place du test and learn. On test puis on apprends tout en se fiant à des métriques probantes ainsi qu’aux experts du secteur.

Prendre en compte les avis, c'est mettre en oeuvre un processus d'intersubjectivité. C'est à dire se mettre d'accord, non pas sur une réalité objective, ni subjective, mais intersubjective. C'est poser les bases pour engager les parties prenantes dans les décisions qui seront prises.

Being receptive to other people's opinions is crucial since they can offer insightful observations that you might have overlooked. Refine your approach and identify areas for improvement with the help of feedback. Depending on the nature of the issue, it's also critical to aggressively seek input from a variety of sources, such as team members, stakeholders, or even customers. Ignoring criticism can cause tunnel vision, in which you miss out on possible solutions because you are too preoccupied with your original concepts. Recall that feedback is a tool for improvement and improved problem-solving, not a judgement on your skills.

One common pitfall in tackling complex problems is overlooking or disregarding feedback from customers, stakeholders, or users. Feedback serves as a vital tool for validating assumptions, assessing solutions, and gleaning insights from setbacks. Dismissing feedback can lead to solutions shaped by personal biases, preferences, or opinions, rather than the genuine needs of the intended audience. To sidestep this error, actively solicit feedback at the outset and throughout the process from a wide range of perspectives. Embrace feedback as a catalyst for iteration and enhancement, ensuring that your solutions are finely tuned to address real-world requirements and challenges.

The true value lies in transforming that feedback into actionable insights. Look for recurring themes or commonalities across different feedback sources to gain a deeper understanding of the problem and potential solutions.

By fostering collective intelligence within your team or network, you can unlock a wider range of solutions and increase the likelihood of finding one that is truly effective and sustainable in the long run.

Isolating oneself to work on a complex topic can be a great error. It's simple to become stuck in your own viewpoint and lose out on insightful observations made by others. Working with a varied team can help you come up with new concepts and methods. Talking to others about the issue might also help you see any assumptions or blind spots you may have had. Plus, it's an excellent way to maintain accountability and motivation. Thus, don't be scared to collaborate and reach out; doing so can really help to find a solution.

Another common mistake when tackling complex problems is to isolate yourself and work alone, neglecting the benefits of collaborating with individuals possessing diverse skills, perspectives, or experiences. Isolating oneself can stifle creativity, hinder innovation, and limit learning opportunities, potentially leading to errors or oversights. To circumvent this error, it's advisable to engage in teamwork or networks that encourage communication, cooperation, and the exchange of varied viewpoints.

C'est ici la co-création et l'interaction qui va être essentielle pour faire émerger la solution avec les parties prenantes. La clé c'est de savoir ce qu'ils sont prêts à engager comme ressources dans la solution, ou la transformation de la situation. Et le but c'est qu'ils s'engagent avec vous.

Cette tendance à tomber amoureux de sa solution est renforcée par le biais cognitif de confirmation, qui fait que l'on renforce une croyance déjà établie. Le risque, c'est de tomber dans une posture de visionnaire, et de dépenser une énergie phénoménale pour convaincre tout le monde du bien fondé de sa solution.

A fourth common mistake in tackling complex problems is becoming overly attached to your solution, disregarding its flaws, drawbacks, or potential alternatives. This attachment can lead to resistance towards change, feedback, or criticism, hindering your ability to see new opportunities or superior solutions. To prevent this error, it's essential to cultivate a growth mindset, which values learning, experimentation, and adaptation. Additionally, practicing detachment enables you to evaluate your solution objectively and, if needed, pivot or abandon it.

Falling in love with your solution can hinder progress by blinding you to flaws and alternatives. To avoid this, cultivate a growth mindset, embracing learning and adaptation, and practice detachment to objectively evaluate and pivot if needed. Stay adaptable!

La résilience est l’une des clés pour ne pas abandonner. Le préférable est de persévérer en mesurant la prise de risque à chaque fois et en réajustant.

Another common error in tackling complex problems is succumbing to premature defeat, resulting in a loss of motivation, confidence, or perseverance. Complex problem-solving often entails a protracted and challenging journey marked by uncertainty, ambiguity, and occasional failure. Yielding too early can impede the realization of one's full potential, the attainment of goals, or the ability to effect positive change. To circumvent this pitfall, it's essential to establish pragmatic and measurable objectives, acknowledge and celebrate milestones and accomplishments, and glean valuable lessons from setbacks and obstacles.

A critical error often encountered when addressing complex problems is neglecting to execute and deliver the proposed solution to customers, stakeholders, or users. This oversight can nullify invested efforts and resources, leaving the problem unresolved or missing out on potential opportunities. To sidestep this pitfall, meticulous planning and execution of an implementation strategy are essential. This strategy should encompass considerations of feasibility, scalability, sustainability, and impact. Additionally, continuous monitoring and evaluation of outcomes are imperative, enabling necessary adjustments or enhancements to be made promptly.

Failing to implement your solution can negate all efforts and resources invested in problem-solving, leaving issues unresolved and opportunities untapped. Avoid this by planning and executing a comprehensive implementation strategy covering feasibility, scalability, sustainability, and impact. Monitor and evaluate results, making necessary adjustments for success. I hope this helps!

An exceptionally innovative and practical strategy for addressing complex problems is the concept of "retrograde problem solving." Departing from traditional methods, it starts with envisioning the successful resolution and reverse-engineering the steps needed to achieve it. Retrograde problem solving shifts focus from the overwhelming problem to actionable steps, fostering a proactive mindset. Challenges involve meticulous planning and potential oversights. Yet, its potential for innovative thinking and a streamlined problem-solving process makes it an exceptionally ingenious approach to complex challenges.