Balancing high-impact and lower-risk test cases requires a clear prioritization strategy, and focus first on high-impact cases that address critical system functionality or potential business risks. Use risk-based testing frameworks to evaluate severity and likelihood, ensuring informed decisions, in automation can streamline lower-risk cases, freeing resources for more critical areas, then regular reviews and collaboration with stakeholders ensure priorities align with evolving project goals!

Balancing high-impact and lower-risk test cases requires a clear understanding of priorities and the end goal.In my experience,it’s crucial to assess the potential impact of each test on the product and users.High-impact cases, which could affect critical functionalities or user experience, should take precedence. However, lowerrisk cases aren’t ignored they’re scheduled strategically, often during less critical phases or parallel to high-priority work.Regular communication with stakeholders ensures alignment on priorities, and maintaining a risk-based testing strategy helps focus resources effectively.Tools like traceability matrices or risk assessments also support making informed decisions while adapting to changes in scope or timelines

Collaborate with stakeholders to understand which functionalities are most important. High-value features or those with tight deadlines should take precedence. Leverage historical data and metrics, such as defect trends or customer-reported issues, to identify areas requiring more rigorous testing. Automate repetitive, lower-risk test cases to free up resources for more complex and high-priority ones. Regularly review priorities during the testing cycle. Adjust based on new insights, evolving requirements, or issues discovered during testing.