You're juggling automated and manual testing for a tight deadline. How do you decide which to prioritize?
With a deadline approaching, it's crucial to efficiently divide your efforts between automated and manual testing. Here's how to strike the right balance:
- Evaluate test criticality. Prioritize tests that cover the most critical functionalities or have the highest risk of defects.
- Assess test complexity. Automation can save time on repetitive, simpler tests, while manual testing is better for complex, exploratory cases.
- Consider the time factor. Use automated tests for quick feedback loops, reserving manual testing for areas that require in-depth, human scrutiny.
How do you balance testing methods under tight deadlines? Share your strategies.
You're juggling automated and manual testing for a tight deadline. How do you decide which to prioritize?
With a deadline approaching, it's crucial to efficiently divide your efforts between automated and manual testing. Here's how to strike the right balance:
- Evaluate test criticality. Prioritize tests that cover the most critical functionalities or have the highest risk of defects.
- Assess test complexity. Automation can save time on repetitive, simpler tests, while manual testing is better for complex, exploratory cases.
- Consider the time factor. Use automated tests for quick feedback loops, reserving manual testing for areas that require in-depth, human scrutiny.
How do you balance testing methods under tight deadlines? Share your strategies.
-
Consider the time factor: If the deadline is tight, there are two approaches a. Automate one e2e test while other tests remain manual b. Stabilize ur regression suite while new functionality is manual Overall if automation doesn't work at the end it's a risk for adding more people which offsets quality