I have some baseline (human) algorithms I use: #1 - cancel all meetings. meetings are usually a waste of time. #2 - pick an easy to achieve goal, and a 'best scenario' goal. No matter what, you must achieve your 'easy' goal, but strive for 'best scenario.; #3 - get help. if you're in charge, rally your team. make sure everyone understands the clear vision. be decisive and clarify that you are leading this effort. make sure everyone knows the deadline. Create a positive atmosphere where failure is not an option #4 - automate what you can and use AI wherever possible. Human-in-the-loop work is nearly always faster than 100% human work, but near the same accuracy (or better) #5 - know when you're beat and realign goals. go get em! - Curtis

Personally, I like to prioritize AI algorithms that post nonsense questions and then asks people for their perspectives. That is what this platform needs more of.

Mainly 2 in my opinion and 3rd if needed - Divide and conquer Divide your work in meaningful sub tasks, delegate those to right people. Or do it yourself based on the sequence that makes sense. - Greedy Be greedy and finish the work based on the MVP requirements. Straightforward approach with clear goal in mind. No diversions or edge cases covered. - Hueristic If none of the above works, and work can't be completed in the given timeline, get a subset of the work done which is as close as possible to the actual task. So we have something substantial albeit incomplete but nevertheless valuable.

From my perspective: - Set clear goals - Lead decisively - Streamline with AI - Adapt quickly These are high level abstraction of algorithm on my mind. Things will go right.