Sempre que penso em seguran?a ou debato com algum par que trabalha na área, aparece a mesma quest?o: seguran?a é sempre a responsável por atrasar os projetos :) Pior que isso é verdade! Explico. Vivemos no paradoxo do ovo ou da gailnha. Se coloco seguran?a no come?o do projeto, testarei partes e n?o o todo. Se coloco seguran?a no final da esteira, aparecem itens a serem corrigidos nos 48 minutos do segundo tempo e com dois atletas a menos. Esse tipo de dilema, faria Plat?o e Aristóteles abandonarem suas quest?es filosóficas inicias (e que me ajudaram bastante até hoje). Quem disser que sabe onde posicionar seguran?a, estará mentindo. N?o é simples... mas o que podemos fazer é ir experimentando o mix (início e final dos projetos).

As of now I have no idea about this topic. But i promise Will explore, research, learn and come back and share my perspective.

I believe no project can be a success without the right testing of the process Concessions can be made based on project deadlines, but remember you better be safe than sorry!!

Security testing is crucial for mobile communications, especially when sensitive data is involved. It helps protect user data, maintain trust, comply with regulations, prevent financial losses, and mitigate the risk of attacks. Testing should cover encryption, secure data storage, authentication, and permission controls, ensuring the communication platform is robust against common mobile threats.

Even when deadlines are tight, security testing in mobile communications is essential. It helps you ensure that any data shared is safe and won’t be intercepted. Skipping this step could lead to security issues that harm the client’s reputation. Plus, addressing security early on can actually save time, as fixing vulnerabilities after deployment can be costly and complex. A small delay for security testing can lead to a smoother rollout and a stronger foundation for future updates.