I can bridge this gap by facilitating open communication between the teams, working out the standards of coding in collaborative workshops, and documenting these conventions for clarity. The shared understanding is going to become a reality only with regular check-ins that ensure consistency and smooth integration of the coding practices of both teams.

Communication: Talk to the team and try to get only practices that you can share as well from them This in turn enables identification of areas where practices do overlap and diverge. Adopt Common Standards: come to consensus on a coding style that all team members should adhere to This could be done by building a shared doc, or an instruction that shows these rules in an easier way to use.

When facing coding convention discrepancies, start by initiating a discussion to align on standards, just as I did when collaborating with cross-functional teams at Capri Technosys. Create a shared document to ensure everyone follows the same guidelines. Regular code reviews are essential for maintaining consistency and addressing any deviations promptly.

Start by establishing clear, shared guidelines. Document and share a comprehensive coding standard that includes naming conventions, code formatting, and best practices. Conduct a joint review session to align both teams on these standards. Use tools for code linting and formatting to enforce consistency. Regularly review code to ensure adherence and provide constructive feedback. Foster open communication to address issues promptly and adjust conventions if necessary. This collaborative approach ensures consistency and improves code quality across teams.

Yes, by establishing clear coding guidelines and regular communication with the external team. Implementing code reviews, setting up shared documentation, and aligning on conventions from the start can effectively bridge coding convention gaps and ensure consistency across both teams.