登录查看更多内容

You’re about to create content for your company. How can you avoid common logical fallacies?

由人工智能和领英社区提供技术支持

Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning that can undermine the credibility and effectiveness of your content. They can make your arguments weak, inconsistent, or misleading, and damage your reputation as a trustworthy and reliable source of information. To avoid common logical fallacies, you need to be aware of them, understand how they work, and learn how to spot and correct them in your own and others' content. In this article, we will cover six types of logical fallacies that you should avoid when creating content for your company.

此文章中的业界达人

由社区从 10 条内容中精选。了解更多

Samatha Vadiga

Co-Founder at AltTab Technologies | Top 1% Digital Marketing LinkedIn Voice | Sculpting Success Stories in Cyberspace |…
Risha B.

Growth Partner @Mavlers | Mental health advocate

1 Ad hominem

Ad hominem is a fallacy that attacks the person making the argument, rather than the argument itself. It is a form of personal insult that tries to discredit the opponent's character, motives, or qualifications, instead of addressing the relevant facts and evidence. For example, "You can't trust his opinion on marketing, he is a failed entrepreneur who has no clue about the industry." This fallacy is irrelevant and unfair, and can backfire by making you look rude and unprofessional. To avoid ad hominem, focus on the merits of the argument, not the person making it.

添加您的观点

Samatha Vadiga

Co-Founder at AltTab Technologies | Top 1% Digital Marketing LinkedIn Voice | Sculpting Success Stories in Cyberspace | Redefining Marketing Norms with a Touch of Innovation
举报内容
To avoid common logical fallacies when creating content: 1. Research Thoroughly: Base your content on credible sources and verified data. 2. Use Sound Reasoning: Ensure your arguments follow logical principles. 3. Avoid Generalizations: Provide specific evidence and examples. 4. Be Consistent: Ensure your content remains coherent throughout. 5. Watch for Biases: Acknowledge and address any personal biases. 6. Be Transparent: Disclose any conflicts of interest. 7. Seek Feedback: Have your content reviewed by peers or experts. 8. Stay Objective: Present information objectively without personal bias.

已翻译

赞
Ananya Verma
举报内容
Critically evaluate your arguments, evidence, and reasoning. Be mindful of logical fallacies such as ad hominem attacks, false dichotomies, or appeals to authority. Support your claims with credible sources, data, and logical reasoning to strengthen your content's validity and persuasiveness. For instance, suppose you're creating content to promote a new product, and you want to highlight its benefits. Avoid using fallacious arguments like assuming correlation implies causation or relying solely on testimonials without empirical evidence. Instead, present concrete data, case studies, or expert opinions to support your claims. By adhering to sound logic and avoiding logical fallacies, you can maintain credibility and effective communication.

已翻译

赞
Daniel Casta?o Rivas
举报内容
→ Descripción: Atacar a la persona que presenta el argumento en lugar de refutar el argumento en sí. → Ejemplo: "No puedes confiar en lo que dice Juan, es un conocido mentiroso." → Cómo evitarlo: Enfócate en los méritos del argumento y no en la persona que lo presenta. Refuta las ideas con evidencia y razonamiento lógico.

已翻译

赞
Taiba Haider

Helping Founders & CEOs Uplift Their Brand's Presence Through Strategic Content & Design | Organic growth, visibility & Leads | SEO | Certified Digital Marketer
举报内容
To avoid logical fallacies in your company's content: 1. Understand common fallacies. 2. Use sound reasoning and evidence. 3. Avoid hasty generalizations. 4. Be mindful of confirmation bias. 5. Watch for false cause and effect. 6. Avoid personal attacks (ad hominem). 7. Provide clear and relevant evidence. 8. Be consistent and avoid contradictions. 9. Be transparent and honest. 10. Seek peer review for feedback.

已翻译

赞

加载更多内容

2 Straw man

Straw man is a fallacy that misrepresents or exaggerates the opponent's position, and then attacks the distorted version, rather than the actual one. It is a form of dishonesty that creates a false or weak target, and then knocks it down easily. For example, "She thinks that social media is the only way to promote our brand, but that is ridiculous. Social media is full of fake news and trolls, and we can't rely on it for our reputation." This fallacy is misleading and unfair, and can backfire by making you look ignorant and dishonest. To avoid straw man, represent the opponent's position accurately and fairly, and address the real issues and arguments.

添加您的观点

Daniel Casta?o Rivas
举报内容
→ Descripción: Distorsionar el argumento del oponente para hacerlo más fácil de atacar. → Ejemplo: "Los ambientalistas quieren que volvamos a vivir en las cavernas." → Cómo evitarlo: Presta atención al argumento real del oponente y refutalo directamente. No exageres ni caricatures sus ideas.

已翻译

赞

3 Appeal to authority

Appeal to authority is a fallacy that relies on the opinion or testimony of an authority figure, without providing sufficient evidence or reasoning to support it. It is a form of false or weak evidence that assumes that the authority is always right, relevant, or unbiased, and that their word is enough to prove the point. For example, "He is a famous expert in content marketing, so he must be right about the best practices and strategies." This fallacy is insufficient and unreliable, and can backfire by making you look lazy and uncritical. To avoid appeal to authority, provide valid and relevant evidence and reasoning to support your claims, and evaluate the credibility and expertise of the authority.

添加您的观点

Daniel Casta?o Rivas
举报内容
→ Descripción: Invocar a una figura de autoridad para dar credibilidad a un argumento, sin importar si la autoridad es relevante o no. → Ejemplo: "Este producto debe ser bueno, lo recomienda una celebridad." → Cómo evitarlo: Usa la evidencia y el razonamiento para respaldar tus argumentos. No te apoyes únicamente en la opinión de una figura de autoridad, especialmente si no es experta en el tema.

已翻译

赞
Ipshita Biswas

Building WebYes | Digital Marketing | Product Marketing | Email Marketing | Martech | IIM Kozhikode | NIT Silchar | Ex-Philips | Artist | Writer
举报内容
Appeal to authority is a common pitfall in marketing content, especially when establishing credibility. At work, there can be a tendency to defer too readily to senior colleagues, especially regarding content creation. Here are some strategies to navigate this situation: If you have research, data, or case studies that suggest a different approach, politely share them. Frame your ideas as additions or refinements. "Building on your point, could we consider incorporating Y as well?" It's essential to be respectful of seniority and feel empowered to contribute your ideas. By approaching the situation strategically, you can foster a collaborative environment where everyone's voice is heard, leading to better content creation.

已翻译

赞

4 False dilemma

False dilemma is a fallacy that presents only two options or alternatives, when in fact there are more than two. It is a form of oversimplification that forces a choice between two extremes, and ignores the possibility of middle ground, compromise, or nuance. For example, "You either create content that is original and creative, or you create content that is boring and generic. There is no in-between." This fallacy is unrealistic and unfair, and can backfire by making you look rigid and dogmatic. To avoid false dilemma, acknowledge the complexity and diversity of the situation, and explore the different options and perspectives that exist.

添加您的观点

Daniel Casta?o Rivas
举报内容
→ Descripción: Presentar solo dos opciones cuando hay más disponibles. → Ejemplo: "Si no estás conmigo, estás contra mí." → Cómo evitarlo: Reconoce que existen diferentes opciones y perspectivas sobre un tema. Presenta una gama completa de posibilidades para que tu audiencia pueda tomar decisiones informadas.

已翻译

赞

5 Hasty generalization

Hasty generalization is a fallacy that draws a conclusion based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence. It is a form of jumping to conclusions that makes a broad or universal claim, based on a few or biased examples. For example, "I posted one blog article and got no comments or shares, so content marketing doesn't work for our company." This fallacy is inaccurate and unreliable, and can backfire by making you look uninformed and illogical. To avoid hasty generalization, provide sufficient and representative evidence to support your conclusion, and qualify your claims with appropriate modifiers and exceptions.

添加您的观点

6 Slippery slope

Slippery slope is a fallacy that predicts a series of negative consequences from a single action or decision, without providing sufficient evidence or reasoning to justify the causal connection. It is a form of fearmongering that exaggerates the potential outcomes, and assumes that one thing will inevitably lead to another, worse thing. For example, "If we don't invest more in content marketing, we will lose our competitive edge, our customers will leave us, and our business will fail." This fallacy is speculative and irrational, and can backfire by making you look paranoid and emotional. To avoid slippery slope, provide valid and relevant evidence and reasoning to support your predictions, and consider the alternative scenarios and probabilities that exist.

添加您的观点

7 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

添加您的观点

Risha B.

Growth Partner @Mavlers | Mental health advocate
举报内容
Some common fallacies marketers (content/copywriters) leverage: 1. Appeal to emotions We've all seen those ads with happy families in the BG image of the product... But does that image truly speak of how good the product is? 2. Bandwagon fallacy: Remember social clout? People (including me) have fallen prey to "1M people trust us: what's stopping you?" 3. Post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy: Remember Moira Rose (Schitts Creek) saying, "It's a sequel, so the first one must be good?" The Crows Have Eyes 1 wasn't even THAT good in reality. Note to customers: Stay curious and skeptical. Note to marketers: Let's get DONE with sleazy marketing to make a quick buck a thing of 2023. Authenticity is what audiences crave- let's give em that.

已翻译

赞

Content Marketing

+ 关注

给文章评分

我们借助人工智能创建了此文章。您认为这篇文章怎么样？

很棒不太好

举报此文章

查看全部

You’re about to create content for your company. How can you avoid common logical fallacies?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 Ad hominem

2 Straw man

3 Appeal to authority

4 False dilemma

5 Hasty generalization

6 Slippery slope

7 Here’s what else to consider

Content Marketing

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

更多Content Marketing相关文章

更多相关阅读内容

You’re about to create content for your company. How can you avoid common logical fallacies?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 Ad hominem

2 Straw man

3 Appeal to authority

4 False dilemma

5 Hasty generalization

6 Slippery slope

7 Here’s what else to consider

Content Marketing

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

查看其他技能