Your team member ignores player accessibility in game design. How can you ensure inclusivity and innovation?

In my experience, understanding the 'Why' behind our actions fosters team commitment. Human-centric design shows that individuals vary widely in abilities, tastes, and styles. Thus, there is no 'niche group accessibility.' A well-designed product should cater to all humans.For instance, adding accessibility features to a recent project benefited players with disabilities and enhanced overall user experience. If a game isn't inclusive, it isn't well-designed. Inclusive design isn't just for a few; it enhances the experience for all by embracing diversity and promoting accessibility, leading to innovative mechanics for everyone.

I think, in a world where inclusivity is a major problem, we need to prioritize people and their ability to join in on the fun. Gaming is all about having fun, and if we can’t include EVERYONE, what are we doing? Inclusivity HAS to become a number one priority. Let’s get there together.

I think we could also dive deeper into specific aspects of accessibility. For instance, exploring tools designed specifically for testing game accessibility could be valuable. Additionally, highlighting how making a game accessible can be a powerful marketing tool would be a great way to show how it benefits the bottom line. For example, games like The Last of Us Part II were praised for their accessibility options, which not only helped players with disabilities but also expanded the game's reach to a broader audience.

Flexibility is key. Encourage your team to think of various ways players can interact with the game. Alternative controls, adjustable difficulty levels – all these options make your game more accessible and can lead to unique, standout gameplay experiences.

This is the interesting part where you have to think 360. Main focus should be the story and how you can twist and adjust player keeping in mind the basic human psyche how will player progress in different level in an innovative manner

Testing on different stages or pdouction is essential to dig up the key issues before release. This process has to be a part of general production flow and be performed regulary by at least inner team. If the budget allows to involve a target players team, that would be great as tastes and experience differ inbetween production specialists and regular players.

Selection of personnel is one of the essential aims at the start of the project. It's always difficult and less productive to involve a certain-field specialist in a middle of development and get them informed to nuances rather that planning the game basis and start and matching a specilists at that stage.

There are several ways to push the players to get your game knowing well: streaming, loading tips, event accent on a featuer, pure guidance, etc. Education of players is a separate serious task which has to garantee that play are away of all the mechanics you have in the game since you do want your features to work out. Otherwise, why would you make them?