1. Coding standards are not something new and needs to be invented. There are plenty of plugins for the IDE we use. We have to review it for warning free from the plugins. 2. The common mistake we do is, doing code review individually. Code review must be done along with entire team, so that, we no need repeat the standard every time. We should let contribution from all team members irrespective of designations.

Must required governs: 1. Maintain distinct code repos by modules 2. Creating a common workspace configuration file which includes rules for lint, formatting, import, build mentoring, errors and warning config. Every modern IDE supports it and once enabled the most compile time issues can be detected at the developer machine 3. Taking care of Versions by adding pre-hooks to implement bullet 3 before commit on remote, which makes pipeline workflows efficient. On top prompt developer to provide correct change description along with tracker number 4. Reviewing the work which can be parted a) Attaching pipeline triggers like dependant bots, & point 3 acc to env of deployment b) Restricting merge to have 2 peer review approvals c) Tag deploy

A consistent coding style is critical to effective team collaboration. The details of the style you land on is less important than the need for having one. A single coding style will make code easier to read across the team and also result in clearer git diffs in code reviews. Where possible, lean towards an established and popular style guide that is well documented and maintained by a community of developers. This should not be something that slows down your development team. Automated linting and formatting tools are a must to ensure a consistent style. Make sure these run as part of your CI pipeline and also add the relevant config to you project so that developers IDE's auto fix as much as possible for them.

To ensure consistency despite conflicting coding standards within a remote team, I would first focus on clear communication. We’d set up a shared documentation that outlines the agreed-upon coding guidelines, ensuring everyone is on the same page. I’d also introduce regular code review sessions, fostering collaboration and learning. Tools like linters and formatters can help automate compliance with the standards. Additionally, I’d encourage team members to ask questions when in doubt, ensuring continuous improvement. By creating a culture of openness and mutual respect, we can ensure that coding standards are consistently followed across the team.

In the past, I've approached conflicting coding standards within my remote teams by establishing a unified, team-wide coding guideline based on best practices & collective input. I encouraged open discussions to address each developer's preferences & concerns, then worked with the team to create a standardized style guide everyone could agree on. To reinforce these standards, I implemented automated code review tools & periodic peer reviews, ensuring consistent application across the team & fostering accountability. This approach streamlined workflows & minimized discrepancies while respecting team members’ individual styles.