登录查看更多内容

Your manager demands swift code approvals. How do you ensure quality without thorough reviews?

由人工智能和领英社区提供技术支持

In computer engineering, code quality is paramount, but what do you do when your manager demands quick approvals? You're caught in a classic bind: the need for speed versus the imperative of quality. This is a challenge, but not an insurmountable one. By implementing smart strategies and leveraging automation, you can streamline the review process without sacrificing the integrity of your codebase. Let's explore how to balance these competing demands effectively.

在这篇协作文章中查找专家回答

由社区从 3 条内容中精选。了解更多

1 Automate Checks

Automation is your ally in the quest for efficient code reviews. Utilize tools that automatically check for syntax errors, code standards, and other basic issues before a human ever looks at the code. This can drastically reduce the time needed for reviews as it filters out many common problems that would otherwise consume valuable time. Static code analysis tools can scan your codebase for potential bugs and security vulnerabilities, allowing you to focus on more complex issues during manual reviews.

添加您的观点

2 Prioritize Changes

When time is of the essence, prioritization becomes key. You must identify which code changes are critical and which can wait. By categorizing updates based on their impact on the system—such as 'critical', 'important', or 'minor'—you ensure that the most significant code gets reviewed first. This strategy helps maintain quality where it matters most while allowing less critical updates to proceed with a lighter review.

添加您的观点

Jaideep Lalchandani

LinkedIn Top Voice (SD) | Fullstack Software Engineer @Falabella | AWS Cloud Certified | JavaScript | TypeScript | React | Node
举报内容
As a software engineer, I quickly learned that prioritization is essential to maintaining quality even if the deadlines for the feature/code are tight. Here are some insights : - Identify which code changes are critical and which can wait. - Categorize updates based on their impact: 'critical', 'important', or 'minor'. - Ensure the most significant code gets reviewed first to maintain quality where it matters most.

已翻译

赞

3 Pair Programming

Pair programming, where two developers write code together at the same workstation, is an excellent way to conduct real-time code reviews. This practice can significantly improve code quality as it encourages collaboration and immediate feedback. When you pair up, one writes the code (the "driver") while the other reviews each line as it's written (the "navigator"). This process not only catches errors early but also facilitates knowledge sharing and reduces the need for later, more formal reviews.

添加您的观点

4 Continuous Integration

Continuous Integration (CI) is a development practice where developers integrate code into a shared repository frequently. Each integration can then be verified by an automated build and automated tests. CI systems can run a suite of tests every time new code is committed, ensuring that changes don't break existing functionality. This constant feedback loop means that issues are identified and can be addressed quickly, often requiring less intensive review.

添加您的观点

Ryan Teo

Backend/Server-Side Software Engineer for Large Scale Computing
举报内容
Although there is CI to run tests, the tests need to be written by your own team. Thus, it's a good practice to continously include and review test cases when updating code or adding new features. A comprehensive suite of tests can help to check for regression, helping to speed up code reviews in scenarios where the reviewers are concerned about existing features being affected.

已翻译

赞

5 Delegate Wisely

Delegation is crucial when time is scarce. You must trust your team and delegate review responsibilities effectively. Spread the workload among qualified team members, ensuring that each piece of code is reviewed by someone with the appropriate expertise. This not only speeds up the process but also empowers your team members by entrusting them with critical tasks and fostering a sense of ownership over the project's success.

添加您的观点

Jaideep Lalchandani

LinkedIn Top Voice (SD) | Fullstack Software Engineer @Falabella | AWS Cloud Certified | JavaScript | TypeScript | React | Node
举报内容
In the heat of tight deadlines, I realized that delegation wasn't just a strategy, it was a necessity. - Assign review tasks to those best suited for them, trusting their expertise. - Make sure every piece of code gets reviewed by someone with the right skills, spreading the workload fairly. - Don't try to do everything yourself because you think you would do it better, trust your team to take care of some things and focus on what is on your plate first!

已翻译

赞

6 Refactor Gradually

Refactoring—restructuring existing computer code without changing its external behavior—can improve its nonfunctional attributes and make it easier to understand. When pressed for time, refactor code in small, manageable sections that can be easily reviewed and tested. This incremental approach minimizes risk and allows for more manageable and quicker reviews, ensuring that even when time is short, refactoring doesn't lead to a drop in quality.

添加您的观点

Computer Engineering

+ 关注

给文章评分

我们借助人工智能创建了此文章。您认为这篇文章怎么样？

很棒不太好

举报此文章

查看全部

Your manager demands swift code approvals. How do you ensure quality without thorough reviews?

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 Automate Checks

2 Prioritize Changes

3 Pair Programming

4 Continuous Integration

5 Delegate Wisely

6 Refactor Gradually

Computer Engineering

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

更多Computer Engineering相关文章

更多相关阅读内容

Your manager demands swift code approvals. How do you ensure quality without thorough reviews?

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 Automate Checks

2 Prioritize Changes

3 Pair Programming

4 Continuous Integration

5 Delegate Wisely

6 Refactor Gradually

Computer Engineering

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

查看其他技能