Your engineering and design teams face stakeholder feedback. How do you navigate conflicting perspectives?

Top 3 ways to navigate between your engineering and design team stakeholder feedback. 1 - Understand all perspective 2 - Evaluate the impact in terms of business revenue and the strategy focused upon 3 - Re-prioritise the feedback actionable items and deliver

Tame the feedback storm! Hold a central feedback session (physical or virtual) - capture everything with a collaborative note-taking tool. Categorize by team (engineering, design) and prioritize based on severity and impact. This centralizes insights and avoids confusion.

Inicie reunindo todo o feedback relevante das partes interessadas. Documente suas preocupa??es e expectativas para garantir que você compreenda totalmente suas perspectivas.

Conflicting perspectives can be challenging but manageable. Here’s how to navigate them: Facilitate Dialogue: Organize meetings for open discussions between engineering, design, and stakeholders. Clarify Objectives: Ensure everyone understands and agrees on core goals. Evaluate Trade-offs: Weigh conflicting feedback to identify valuable changes that won’t compromise integrity. Build Consensus: Find common ground and propose balanced solutions. Communicate Clearly: Keep everyone informed about decisions and their rationale. By fostering collaboration and focusing on shared goals, you can harmonize perspectives and achieve successful outcomes.

Yes, after navigating IT product dev & engineering teams for years, I've seen conflicting feedback as fuel for innovation. Don't see it as a clash, but a brainstorm! Gather all input (engineering's logic, design's creativity & more), find common ground, and use it to create a product that's both technically sound AND delightful to use. Remember, the best solutions often emerge from the beautiful mess of diverse perspectives!

Avalie como as sugest?es e feedback recebidos afetam o produto e o projeto. Considere os impactos positivos e negativos de cada ponto de vista, utilizando dados concretos para sustentar sua análise.

Map feedback on a matrix with axes for "Alignment with Strategy" and "Impact on User Experience." Focus on high-impact, high-alignment items. Analyze feedback alongside user research and data (e.g., usage metrics) to gauge its validity and impact on key goals.

In addition to strategic alignment, consider the technical implications of implementing the feedback. Assess how suggested changes might affect the project's timeline, resource allocation, and overall technical feasibility. This includes looking at potential complexities or technical challenges that could arise from implementing new features or changes. This analytical approach allows you to sift through the feedback effectively, separating critical insights from less relevant comments (the "noise"). By focusing on actionable insights that align well with both your product strategy and technical capabilities, you can ensure that development efforts remain focused and productive, driving your project forward in a meaningful way.

Yes, having seen countless IT product debates over the years, I believe strong analysis is your secret weapon. Feedback is a buffet – some dishes are gourmet (valuable!), some are questionable. Analyze each piece – how does it impact users and align with goals? Focus on the feedback that builds a product that's both delicious (user-friendly) and nutritious (delivers value). Remember, young chefs, informed decisions are the recipe for product success!

Avalie como as diferentes perspectivas afetam o produto e os objetivos do projeto. Utilize dados quantitativos e qualitativos para entender as implica??es de cada ponto de vista.

Facilite discuss?es colaborativas entre as equipes de engenharia, design e as partes interessadas. Promova um ambiente onde todas as vozes sejam ouvidas e incentivadas a contribuir para solu??es viáveis, focando sempre nos objetivos comuns do projeto.

Engineers can clarify feasibility, suggest alternative solutions, and identify potential roadblocks. Designers can explain user experience considerations and advocate for design principles. Open discussion fosters creative solutions and builds team buy-in for the final decisions.

Incorporating your teams in these discussions also ensures that any proposed changes or solutions are realistically achievable and beneficial from both a design and technical standpoint. This involvement can help prevent potential issues down the line, such as overcommitment or misalignment with project capabilities, ultimately leading to a more cohesive and successful product that meets or exceeds stakeholder expectations.

Facilite sess?es de colabora??o entre as equipes de engenharia e design para discutir os achados. Promova um ambiente de comunica??o aberta onde todos se sintam ouvidos e possam contribuir para solu??es conjuntas.

While I don't advocate for involving teams directly in feedback conversations that should be between stakeholders and the PO/PM. The Product Team should without a doubt bring all feedback back to dev and design for additional thoughts and alternative solutions. Remember to take what the customer "Wants" and work with your teams to provide what the customer "Needs".

When your teams have participated and the feedback has been analyzed, it is time to talk about priorities. This discussion should be centred on what matters most for product success and balance among competing viewpoints. It is a delicate balancing act involving negotiation where you will have to deal with some hard choices about what to do, what to defer or what to eliminate. To ensure that your choices are directed towards attaining this goal, always keep the central product vision in mind during these conversations.

When navigating conflicting stakeholder feedback, prioritize by aligning feedback with product goals and user needs. Facilitate inclusive discussions involving all stakeholders, engineering, and design teams to ensure diverse perspectives are considered. Transparently communicate decisions, emphasizing the product vision while addressing immediate concerns. Iterate based on ongoing feedback to refine strategies and maintain alignment with evolving project requirements, adopting a collaborative environment contributing to successful outcomes.

During these priority-setting discussions, it's essential to keep the overarching product vision at the center of all deliberations. This helps ensure that every decision aligns with and supports the long-term goals of the project. By consistently referring back to the product vision, you can provide a clear framework that guides the decision-making process, helping to resolve conflicts and prioritize actions that offer the most significant benefit to the product's success.

It can be very helpful to have the roadmap updated and ready to bring into conflicts around prioritization. If somebody feels strong enough about an item that you don't see the value in show them the roadmap and get votes on what to deprioritize. This can help make the picture clear, show capacity issues and bring teams and stakeholders internally to the same page. The Product Manager needs to keep everyone marching to the same beat and it can't be done without regular cadence checks and conversations throughout the week. Start with traditional scrum and adapt from there. Remember the scrum meetings are valued for a reason, stick to them and watch your teams and then your product shine.

Yes, guiding IT products for years has shown me clear decisions are the captain at the helm. After analyzing feedback (see previous point), don your captain's hat, weigh options, and make a choice. Communicate it clearly (course correction!) to your crew (teams & stakeholders) – transparency builds trust. Remember, decisive leadership keeps your product on course for success!

An excellent example here is Spotify as they constantly release feature to small group of users & gathers feedback before they iterate the feature further to roll out to broader audience. Typically how the process works includes: 1) Continuous Evaluation- Gathering frequent feedbacks at various stages of PDLC. 2)Feedback sources- Receiving inputs from multiple sources, internal teams helps in understanding unique insights that help refine project direction and solutions. 3) Feedback integration- Analyzing & integrating feedback to the project may result in adjustments to design, functionality, priorities & also strategic decision. 4) Testing & Validation- This step is critical to ensure the changes made on the feedback are effective.

This is a great solution to the challenge of Balancing Speed and Quality: Balancing the need for rapid delivery with maintaining high technical and design standards. Deliver a minimum viable version for the launch, ensuring critical functionality while planning post-launch iterations for improvement. This balances speed with quality, ensuring a valuable product for stakeholders and users.

This iterative approach ensures stakeholder voices are heard, informs ongoing product development, and fosters a collaborative environment where everyone feels invested in the product's success.

Utilize the scrum retrospective to get feedback on process and procedure to make sure it's working for everyone. The product management game also involves process management. Keep meetings to a minimum and make sure they have an agenda while adapting and adjusting your process towards perfection.