Last updated on 2024年8月29日

Your client demands quick usability testing. Are you willing to sacrifice user feedback for speed?

由人工智能和领英社区提供技术支持

In the fast-paced business world, the pressure to release products quickly can often lead to the dilemma of whether to sacrifice quality user feedback for speed in usability testing. Usability testing is a critical step in product development that involves evaluating a product or service by testing it with representative users. This process helps identify any usability problems, collect qualitative and quantitative data, and determine the participant's satisfaction with the product. However, when time is of the essence, you may be tempted to cut corners. But before you do, consider the potential risks and benefits of rapid testing methods versus comprehensive user feedback.

此文章中的业界达人

由社区从 4 条内容中精选。了解更多

Danial Nazemi

UI/UX Designer | Voice Actor
Eric Njanga

Creative Technologist || Website Experience Specialist || User Interface Specialist || UI Development Specialist || UX…
Muhammad Shahzad Sultan

Senior Test Automation Engineer | FAST'18 | LUMS'23

1 Speed vs Insight

Rapid usability testing methods can certainly save time, but they often provide less depth compared to traditional testing. Think of it as taking a snapshot versus painting a detailed portrait of user experiences. Quick methods like guerrilla testing, where you seek immediate feedback from people in public places, can give you some insights fast. However, these insights might not be as deep or as broad as those you would get from a more thorough testing process. It's about finding the balance between the need for speed and the richness of the data you collect.

添加您的观点

Muhammad Shahzad Sultan

Senior Test Automation Engineer | FAST'18 | LUMS'23
举报内容
No, sacrificing user feedback for speed compromises the quality of usability testing. Instead, prioritize efficiency by focusing on essential tasks and high-impact areas. Use rapid testing methods and a small, representative user sample to quickly gather actionable insights without losing the depth of feedback. This approach ensures that even with limited time, you still address critical usability issues effectively.

已翻译

赞
Rose Karimpour

Product Designer | Specializing in Consumer-Focused Mobile & Web UX/UI | Passionate about Human-Centered Design & Usability
举报内容
Rapid usability testing methods can indeed save time, but they often lack the depth that more traditional, comprehensive testing provides. It's like comparing a snapshot to a detailed portrait—quick methods give you a glimpse, while thorough testing offers a richer understanding of user experiences.

已翻译

赞

2 Testing Techniques

There are several techniques you can employ for quick usability testing that don't completely forsake user feedback. Remote unmoderated testing, for example, allows users to complete tasks at their own pace while their interactions are recorded for later analysis. This method can gather feedback from a diverse user base in a short amount of time. Another technique, the RITE method (Rapid Iterative Testing and Evaluation), involves making quick changes to the product as soon as an issue is identified and immediately testing again. While faster, these techniques still rely on actual user feedback and can provide valuable insights.

添加您的观点

Danial Nazemi

UI/UX Designer | Voice Actor
举报内容
There are several techniques we can use, but for whatever it is going to be, it should not give a user a shame discrete or emotion for not completing the task or whatsoever. Best option is to design and add interactions on prototype version, not only it is faster to achieve but also easier for us to change something and test it out again while user is on the preview page. (Darkmode and Lightmode, Not able to see CTA, hard to read text and etc.) and with screen recorder or tools to see their most clickable parts we can receive useful and more superior feedbacks. Finally, we have valuable feedbacks that will be useful for the product.

已翻译

赞

3 Quality Compromise

When you prioritize speed in usability testing, there's an inherent risk of compromising on the quality of feedback. Detailed user feedback is invaluable for uncovering nuanced issues that might otherwise go unnoticed. Quick tests might tell you if something is broken or not intuitive, but they may not tell you why or how to fix it. This could lead to superficial fixes that don't address underlying problems, which can be more costly in the long run if they result in a poor user experience or require additional rounds of testing and development later on.

添加您的观点

4 Stakeholder Expectations

Managing stakeholder expectations is crucial when it comes to balancing speed and user feedback in usability testing. It's important to communicate the trade-offs between quick results and comprehensive insights. Stakeholders need to understand that while faster testing can move the development process along more quickly, it may also lead to less informed decisions. By setting realistic expectations about the outcomes of rapid testing, you can ensure that stakeholders are on board with the approach and understand its limitations.

添加您的观点

5 Feedback Integration

添加您的观点

6 Future Iterations

Remember that usability testing is not a one-and-done process. Quick testing can be particularly useful for identifying immediate, major issues that need to be addressed before a product launch. However, future iterations of your product should include more comprehensive testing. This allows for deeper understanding and refinement of the user experience over time. By planning for ongoing testing, you can ensure that your product continues to meet user needs and expectations, even after the initial rush to market.

添加您的观点

7 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

添加您的观点

Eric Njanga

Creative Technologist || Website Experience Specialist || User Interface Specialist || UI Development Specialist || UX Design Generalist
举报内容
Yes and no. It all depends on the business imperatives of the moment. Yes, we can sacrifice user feedback for speed, but only when absolutely necessary; otherwise the solution will gradually lose it's "user-centricity".

已翻译

赞

Usability Testing

+ 关注

给文章评分

我们借助人工智能创建了此文章。您认为这篇文章怎么样？

很棒不太好

举报此文章

Balancing stakeholder requests and usability best practices: How can you make the right decisions?

查看全部

Your client demands quick usability testing. Are you willing to sacrifice user feedback for speed?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 Speed vs Insight

2 Testing Techniques

3 Quality Compromise

4 Stakeholder Expectations

5 Feedback Integration

6 Future Iterations

7 Here’s what else to consider

Usability Testing

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

更多Usability Testing相关文章

更多相关阅读内容

Your client demands quick usability testing. Are you willing to sacrifice user feedback for speed?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 Speed vs Insight

2 Testing Techniques

3 Quality Compromise

4 Stakeholder Expectations

5 Feedback Integration

6 Future Iterations

7 Here’s what else to consider

Usability Testing

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

查看其他技能