Your analysis clashes with a senior colleague's findings. How do you navigate this conflicting scenario?
Ever faced a professional standoff? Dive in and share how you've navigated conflicting analyses with colleagues.
Your analysis clashes with a senior colleague's findings. How do you navigate this conflicting scenario?
Ever faced a professional standoff? Dive in and share how you've navigated conflicting analyses with colleagues.
-
I would approach the situation with professionalism and openness. First, I would carefully review both sets of findings to ensure I fully understand the basis of the disagreement. Then, I would respectfully engage in a discussion with the colleague, presenting my analysis and asking for clarification on their perspective. The key is to focus on evidence and facts, avoiding any defensive or confrontational tone. If needed, I would propose revisiting the data or methods used to reconcile the differences. The goal is to collaborate towards the best outcome, rather than proving who is right. Seeking input from other team members or an objective third party can also help resolve the conflict constructively.
-
Le postulat de départ est qu aucune des conclusions n'est plus juste ou plus erronée que l autre. Dans un premier temps, je m'assurerai des similitudes ou différences des méthodes et approches. Les mêmes données observées et analysées sous des pont de vue différents peuvent générer des contradictions. Dans un second temps, une discussion sera nécessaire pour affiner les conclusions. Après analyse conjointe, une des conclusions sera choisie, sans pour autant être celles énoncées dans son intégralité.