What are the potential pitfalls when first adopting VR for design reviews?

Recognizing the hardware-related challenges in XR development is crucial. Issues such as latency can significantly disrupt the immersive experience, while the need for high computational power to manage complex graphics and real-time interactions is demanding. Additionally, limitations in battery life and thermal management present significant obstacles, particularly for mobile and wearable XR devices. Achieving high-resolution displays and precise motion tracking necessitates sophisticated and often expensive components. Overcoming these challenges demands not only technical expertise but also innovative problem-solving to extend the capabilities of the current hardware technology.

How it fits on the face and the weight are super important. Also, when 1st inside and immersion headset, it’s possible dizziness and nausea can occur. Lastly interoperability with different Metaverse platforms needs considerable attention.

Some challenges that can exist when adopting Virtual Reality for design reviews are having VR-compatible hardware, software that meets the needs and adequate guidance for the teams that will be using the system. With inadequate hardware, latency will be high and will impact on the viability of the analysis and user comfort. It is also necessary to have adequate software, with tools that will meet the demand and a cost that matches the expected gains. Finally, it is important to engage the teams that will be using the system and, to this end, they must have adequate training and guidance during use, making it easier for them to adopt the tool in their day-to-day work.

Access to wearable headsets is yet a big challenge in many parts of the world. Besides the motion sickness associated with VR headset by some users, a design review must take to account that headsets may not be common everywhere

Adopting VR for design reviews can present several challenges, including high initial costs for hardware and software, which might strain budgets. The technical complexity of setting up and maintaining VR systems requires specialized expertise, adding to the operational burden. Additionally, there is a significant learning curve for both designers and stakeholders to become proficient with VR tools. Compatibility issues with existing design software and potential motion sickness for users can also hinder the seamless integration of VR. These factors can complicate the adoption process and impact the effectiveness of VR in design reviews.

The software + hardware you choose should optimize for the use case. If you’re prototyping a product and it’s mostly individual work you might want a higher end device like a Varjo with really robust design functionality. If you’re doing group work where a variety of stakeholders are sharing ideas or troubleshooting, then you need to optimize for collaboration and idea sharing instead. So you’d probably be okay with more standard headsets like MetaQuest, LenovoVRX, Pico, or HTC. The software needs to allow for many users and include features that support story telling more than design. Check that the platform integrates with your non VR tech stack. Both adding content to VR & accessing your ideas on desktop after your VR meetings.

Developing good and responsible content in virtual reality takes a lot of time to be developed with ideal quality and technique. Some software is used in addition to basic programming within the goggles. It is necessary to consider modeling, rigging, lighting, and a more precise process when it comes to creation. Not to mention accuracy in terms and compatibility between diferent softwares.

When working with VR, one of the weaknesses is the postproduction software to create 360 videos: if your team doesn't work with VR before, probably they are going to have to learn a new software, or at least a new pluggin. Once you are inside, I think is very easy to follow, but maybe the start can be tricky. Also, as VR field still in development, sometimes is difficult to research new techniques or find solutions for some problems that can appears in the postproduction process. For that, is very important to follow differents forums and threads to put the knowledge in common.

La création de contenu VR présente plusieurs défis logiciels. Les bugs et erreurs peuvent causer des crashes et des glitches visuels, affectant l’immersion. La compatibilité avec divers systèmes d’exploitation et matériels VR est essentielle. L’optimisation des performances, incluant la gestion de la mémoire et des temps de chargement, est cruciale. L’interface utilisateur doit être ergonomique et réactive. Une gestion robuste des données et des sauvegardes est nécessaire. Les mises à jour doivent être compatibles et les problèmes de réseau pour les jeux multijoueurs doivent être minimisés. Enfin, les SDK et dépendances doivent être gérés soigneusement.

In VR it can be difficult to get an accurate sense of color and materials, vs reviewing them in the real world. Don’t get me wrong, you can get pretty close, and there are some impressive demos out there. Sometimes you need to get a ‘bullseye’ accurate PMS color, or review the fine nap of a rug. That level of accuracy and specificity doesn’t really work in an iterative VR design process… yet. You also can’t get a tangible sense of materials since you can’t actually reach out and touch them. Additionally, reflections and lighting in VR are just representative, not simulated. VR doesn’t do a great job of communicating the vibrancy of actual light. Bright values often clip to white. All said, VR is still an excellent tool for spatial reviews.

Working with in VR is so much different and difficult than create conventional videos. You need to train your eye, and learn what is best for the VR set. Also its important to check from time to time how the video is working in the glasses, because posproduce in the pc can be tricky. Always check colors, lumminance, target point and of course if you are working in 3D, check the depth of field because it can cause headaches and sickness.

This is true to an extent for colour accuracy or text legibility, or scale differently in VR compared to 2D or flat technologies. These fortunately will be solved by the evolution of tech. The war between Apple silicon, Intel, Nvidia, AMD is a very good sprouting ground to spearhead in 3D VR/AR. Being early adopters, we will have to be patient and keep engaging these new technologies constantly. VR and AR is here to stay and will be part of our daily lives.

Le choix entre 3D et 2D dépend du type de contenu et des objectifs de l’application VR. Pour des expériences immersives et interactives, le 3D est préférable malgré ses co?ts et besoins en optimisation. Le 2D convient mieux aux éléments UI et à la réduction des charges de travail et des ressources, offrant une balance entre simplicité et performance.

Touch and feel, contrary to popular belief, are skills. They have evolved over time to give us, as a species, a better "grip" on things around us. VR truly is a gift when it comes to technical capabilities and maybe even ease of use. But it takes out a factor or humanity from design. It informs, educates and even entertains but 'does it integrate' is, I feel, a question still unanswered.

Users who get motion sick can try the following tricks: - Don't move around in the app, or close your eyes while moving. - Move only in the direction your head is pointing - Blow a fan towards the face - Traditional nausea cures like ginger candy can actually be helpful afterwards - Don't have an extended session, limit to 20 minutes. - Be assured that for most people the body adjusts and are able to tolerate more over time.

Correct, I agree with Alisa, sitting on a chair for beginners is highly recommended especially when trying out "challenging" experiences. This is another major part which will be solved with technological advancement. Look for The Gen1 headset from Facebook and today's Gen3, of course, other manufacturers like Bigscreen Beyond a very sleek design with optional prescription lens inserts are available. I am very confident it is a mega industry to boom in the next decade.

Pour certaines personnes, l’expérience VR peut être désagréable en raison de la motion sickness, des problèmes de confort visuel et physique, de la chaleur, de l’isolation sensorielle, et des préoccupations hygiéniques. Adapter les réglages, optimiser la performance et maintenir une bonne hygiène peuvent atténuer ces problèmes.

In the not-faraway future, all our body gestures will be tracked digitally, improving communication and collaboration. We already have hand-tracking; the interactions are more natural and intuitive, and we can express ourselves better using our hands. Hands up or down to express agreement or disagreement, waving to say hello, pointing to remark something. Eye tracking is also a technology ready to use today, allowing us to have a real gaze in our digital environment. Also, Apple Vision Pro tracks the mouth to sync when we are speaking. Someday, we could track the entire body to express ourselves as we do in the real world, so collaboration will be as fluent as it can be for anyone.

When adopting VR into a business workflow, cost is a big factor that must be considered. The expenses associated with VR technology can be substantial, and anyone who has produced a VR project will understand the intricate technical processes required to achieve satisfactory results. (chromatic/colour cast correction, tripod removal etc) Integrating VR into business operations requires an understanding of its potential benefits and an assessment of its cost-effectiveness. Utility of VR in business is vital for justifying the allocation of a budget to fund VR projects. Furthermore, VR can enhance customer engagement and lead generation. Ultimately, the objective of any business is to reduce costs, generate leads, and increase profitability.

Expectation management is key. People have seen XR primarily in the movies and they have an over active imagination about how great the first experience will be