登录查看更多内容

What are the most common readability formulas for improving content?

由人工智能和领英社区提供技术支持

If you want to improve your content quality and readability, you need to measure how easy or difficult it is for your audience to understand your message. One way to do that is to use readability formulas, which are mathematical calculations that estimate the reading level of a text based on factors such as sentence length, word length, and word frequency. In this article, you will learn about the most common readability formulas and how to apply them to your writing.

此文章中的业界达人

由社区从 8 条内容中精选。了解更多

1 Flesch Reading Ease

This formula was developed by Rudolf Flesch in 1948 and is one of the oldest and most widely used readability tests. It scores a text on a scale from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate easier readability. The score is based on the average number of words per sentence and the average number of syllables per word. A general guideline is that a score of 60 to 70 is suitable for most audiences, while a score below 30 is very difficult to read. You can use tools like Hemingway Editor or Readable to check your Flesch Reading Ease score.

添加您的观点

Chester Davis

CEO Global Safety Agency | Countering and Preventing Terrorism and Violent Extremism | U.S DHS-CERT VLP | CISA VLP | FEMA (ISP) & NHS-Training | Perpetual | TOP VOICE LINKEDIN 10 BADGES
举报内容
Dont spend hours crafting a blog post, only to have my readers tell you that it was too difficult to follow. This formula, developed by Rudolf Flesch in 1948, measures the readability of a text based on sentence length and syllable count. See if you can get a 86 score out of 100 and the higher the score, the easier your content will be to read But I didn't stop there, exploring other formulas I came across the Gunning Fog Index and the Coleman-Liau Index. ?? Each one gave me a different perspective on the readability of my content and helped me make necessary improvements to my writing making my job and your reading easier.

已翻译

赞
Tarja Kaltiomaa

Kirjailija, Writer
举报内容
A good structure and a final summary are important to produce for the presentation, because this makes it easier for the listeners or readers to remember the main points of the presentation. The book contains the entire information, the presentation has the highlights and the most important content points of the book.

已翻译

赞
Pedro Pavanato

?? especialista em conteúdo no LinkedIn | ghostwriter | LinkedIn creator
举报内容
Ninguém vai consumir seu conteúdo se ele n?o chamar aten??o. Seu conteúdo está competindo a aten??o com imagens e vídeos, ent?o ter um título chamativo e uma formata??o bem feita fazem uma BAITA diferen?a. Um título que chama aten??o é uma frase forte que diz algo de relevante, algumas dicas práticas s?o: - Mostrar erros comuns da sua área - Afirma??es sobre o seu mercado - Utilizar emojis (com modera??o) - Incluir números e dados (percebeu como essa lista faz uma escadinha de tamanho? esse tipo de formata??o também conta muito) Outra dica prática para conteúdos maiores, percebeu que n?o tem parágrafos t?o grandes aqui? Que tem espa?amento entre as linhas? Tudo isso parece bobo, mas coloca esse texto sem espa?os para ver a diferen?a!

已翻译

赞

2 Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level

This formula is a variation of the Flesch Reading Ease test, but it converts the score into a US grade level. It was created by J. Peter Kincaid and his team in 1975 for the US Navy to assess the readability of technical manuals. The formula is based on the same factors as the Flesch Reading Ease test, but with a different weighting. A general guideline is that a grade level of 8 or lower is suitable for most audiences, while a grade level above 12 is very difficult to read. You can use the same tools as the Flesch Reading Ease test to check your Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level.

添加您的观点

Chester Davis

CEO Global Safety Agency | Countering and Preventing Terrorism and Violent Extremism | U.S DHS-CERT VLP | CISA VLP | FEMA (ISP) & NHS-Training | Perpetual | TOP VOICE LINKEDIN 10 BADGES
举报内容
Our goal as writers is to communicate our ideas effectively. Written communication is important because it allows for standardization, which can lead to more effective interactions. After all, what good is my content if it's not easily understood by my audience.

已翻译

赞

3 Gunning Fog Index

This formula was developed by Robert Gunning in 1952 and is designed to measure the complexity of a text. It scores a text on a scale from 1 to 20, where higher scores indicate harder readability. The score is based on the average number of words per sentence and the percentage of words that have three or more syllables. A general guideline is that a score of 12 or lower is suitable for most audiences, while a score above 17 is very difficult to read. You can use tools like WebFX or Readability Formulas to check your Gunning Fog Index.

添加您的观点

Chester Davis

CEO Global Safety Agency | Countering and Preventing Terrorism and Violent Extremism | U.S DHS-CERT VLP | CISA VLP | FEMA (ISP) & NHS-Training | Perpetual | TOP VOICE LINKEDIN 10 BADGES
举报内容
Examination of the Impact of Tax Avoidance on the Readability of Tax Footnotes. Perfect Example of having a high Gunning Fog Index calculation Relative to the most popular formula—the Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level—the GFI applies a greater penalty to complex words. Gunning Fog Index calculation

已翻译

赞

4 SMOG Index

This formula was created by Harry McLaughlin in 1969 and stands for Simple Measure of Gobbledygook. It is similar to the Gunning Fog Index, but it uses a different method to count the words that have three or more syllables. It scores a text on a scale from 1 to 20, where higher scores indicate harder readability. The score is based on the number of sentences and the number of polysyllabic words in a sample of 30 sentences. A general guideline is that a score of 10 or lower is suitable for most audiences, while a score above 14 is very difficult to read. You can use tools like Readable or SMOG Calculator to check your SMOG Index.

添加您的观点

5 Coleman-Liau Index

This formula was developed by Meri Coleman and T. L. Liau in 1975 and is based on the assumption that shorter words and sentences are easier to read than longer ones. It scores a text on a US grade level, where higher scores indicate harder readability. The score is based on the average number of letters per 100 words and the average number of sentences per 100 words. A general guideline is that a grade level of 8 or lower is suitable for most audiences, while a grade level above 12 is very difficult to read. You can use tools like Readability Score or Text Analyzer to check your Coleman-Liau Index.

添加您的观点

6 Automated Readability Index

This formula was created by the US Air Force in 1967 and is also based on the assumption that shorter words and sentences are easier to read than longer ones. It scores a text on a US grade level, where higher scores indicate harder readability. The score is based on the average number of characters per word and the average number of words per sentence. A general guideline is that a grade level of 8 or lower is suitable for most audiences, while a grade level above 12 is very difficult to read. You can use the same tools as the Coleman-Liau Index to check your Automated Readability Index.

添加您的观点

7 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

添加您的观点

Dr. Shyamala Peesapati

Rare Disease Advocate | Marketing Manager | Content Strategist | Copywriter | Dentist ?? Helping organizations generate leads and 10X their sales with my compelling storytelling and strategic content planning ??
举报内容
To keep it simple, here are the most basic things to consider. 1) Title: Keep it simple, self-explanatory, and target the primary keyword. 2) Meta description: include the primary keyword 3) Overall write your content in points, that is, structure your article overall. 4) Headings and subheadings in place. 5) Use simple English. 6) Check the readability score by copying the content and pasting it in Hemingway Editor. It gives the readability score. Bonus tip: Ensure adequate spacing and don't stuff more than 4 lines per paragraph. It hampers SEO too. Best wishes :)

已翻译

赞
Chester Davis

CEO Global Safety Agency | Countering and Preventing Terrorism and Violent Extremism | U.S DHS-CERT VLP | CISA VLP | FEMA (ISP) & NHS-Training | Perpetual | TOP VOICE LINKEDIN 10 BADGES
举报内容
"Readability" Mistaken interpretation, in which one or more parties is unclear about the terms of a written contract. This must involve a major element of the agreement, not a trivial element that can be easily fixed. However, the contract will not be invalidated if the person knew that they did not understand the contract correctly when they signed it.

已翻译

赞
Faiza Rehman Qureshi

"Experienced Scriptwriter & Content Writer | Crafting Compelling Narratives that Captivate Audiences and Drive Engagement."
举报内容
To make the content easier for audiences, creating relativity is Important. The content should look and sound original. In this era of filters and fakness, a lot of people want Originality. And they appreciate it. If they can relate to the content, it will definitely trigger them to take an action.

已翻译

赞

Writing

+ 关注

给文章评分

我们借助人工智能创建了此文章。您认为这篇文章怎么样？

很棒不太好

举报此文章

查看全部

What are the most common readability formulas for improving content?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 Flesch Reading Ease

2 Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level

3 Gunning Fog Index

4 SMOG Index

5 Coleman-Liau Index

6 Automated Readability Index

7 Here’s what else to consider

Writing

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

更多Writing相关文章

更多相关阅读内容

What are the most common readability formulas for improving content?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 Flesch Reading Ease

2 Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level

3 Gunning Fog Index

4 SMOG Index

5 Coleman-Liau Index

6 Automated Readability Index

7 Here’s what else to consider

Writing

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

查看其他技能