What are the most common mistakes when creating a sitemap?

The biggest mistake is thinking too much about the "what" and not the "why". There should always be a reason for the information/functionality to exist and be presented to the audience.

1. Not understanding your customer's needs. This is a critical first step. 2. Not applying your understanding of your customer's needs. 3. Not testing assumptions. 4. Having inconsistency. Your site map should be consistently structured and tell an overall story.

A sitemap facilitates the indexing process to search engines and allows to have a general idea of the different services that a website has. It is especially recommended for sites such as blogs or websites with dynamic content such as e-commerces, although it is really good to have it in almost any project. The most common format is XLM. It is recommended and good practice to create it after having analyzed the website and created crawling tests. After this, it would only be necessary to include it in the robots.txt file. Not having a sitemap is a bad practice. It takes little time to do it and it is a good resource when positioning our website.

Common mistakes in creating information architecture include: 1.Lack of User Research:Not understanding user needs and behaviors can lead to structures that don't align with actual user expectations. 2.Overcomplication: Creating overly complex structures can confuse users. Keep it simple and intuitive. 3. Inconsistent Terminology: Using inconsistent labels or terminology can create confusion. Maintain uniform language throughout. 4. Ignoring Mobile Users: Neglecting the mobile experience can result in IA that doesn't adapt well to different screen sizes.

Antes que definir el mapa hay que definir el propósito del sitio, investigar, y luego proponer el camino que deberá seguir el usuario por nuestras secciones, corregir y analizar para asegurarnos de que nuestro usuario llega a su meta de la forma más eficiente posible.

Digital design isn't a waterfall process, in that, while things are done in order, they should never be looked at as "locked and finished" until you're ready to launch. What does this mean? It means to never be afraid to take a look at the previous step after completing the next one, and make revisions to the previous. When the sitemap is ready for the next phase, be sure to keep reviewing it as you go. You'll discover things to fix or optimize in the next phase of wireframes, content, design, and build. Don't feel like you can't correct the sitemap later. It's not an error to adapt to new information. Be sure to educate your clients/stakeholders on this process BEFORE you start, so they understand.

Like all things in life, a website's map, known as a "sitemap," is also constantly evolving. This dynamic nature can impact the structure of website content and vice versa. Implementing a broken link monitoring service is essential to detect 404 errors and identify sections needing review. Fortunately, several solutions exist, including creating SEO-friendly 301 redirects, updating page URLs, or setting "no-follow," "no-index" rules to tell crawlers not to explore those sections. ???????????? ?????????? ??????????????!

Se você removeu páginas do seu site mas elas permanecem no sitemap, é comum o Google entender isso como um sinal de que estas urls ainda s?o válidas apesar de estarem indisponíveis, pois ele entende que isso é temporário. Remova as urls, coloque redirect 301 para uma equivalente ou 410 quando ela n?o existir mais. Remova elas do sitemap. Use a ferramenta de "Remo??es" no GSC para agilizar o processo.

If a sitemap is outdated it can significantly harm the positioning of a website. An outdated or poorly structured sitemap can index links that do not work, are broken or no longer exist, and that's bad enough. It must be updated continuously and rigorously and be reviewed every so often, especially to optimize crawlability. In short, a bad sitemap is detrimental to the SEO of a website, as it will be giving incorrect information to search engines, which will potentially confuse their algorithms and will be reflected in our SEO ranking.

It's essential to implement dynamic sitemap generation, particularly for sites with frequent content updates. This keeps the sitemap accurately reflecting the current state of the website, thereby maintaining optimal crawl efficiency and accuracy in search engine indexing.

As discussed in Mistake 2, a sitemap should be constantly evolving to reflect the dynamic nature of a website. However, it's crucial to maintain consistency throughout this evolution. Inconsistency within a sitemap can lead to confusion for both users and search engines. Fortunately, several automation and monitoring tools can help detect inconsistencies, such as "ManageWP". These tools can help identify issues early on, allowing for swift resolution and preventing larger problems. Remember, there are no excuses for neglecting your sitemap. It's a well-worth investment that will benefit your website in numerous ways. ?????????? ?????????? ??????????????!

SEO Técnico é "n?o atrapalhar o rastreador" colocando informa??es n?o coesas. Informa??es inconsistentes fazem ele demorar para entender as coisas. Sitemap listando urls sem https, uso inconsistente de www, urls que redirecionam ou n?o s?o canonicas é um problema que pode atrasar a leitura adequada.

Any inconsistency, such as discrepancies in URL protocols (HTTP vs. HTTPS) can mislead search engines, causing inefficient crawling and indexation issues. Regular audits are necessary to align the sitemap with the website's current architecture.

Es importante organizar la arquitectura de la información comprobando que los usuarios buscan las cosas donde nosotros suponemos que las buscarán. Para esto es fundamental testear. Una herramienta muy utilizada es el card sorting que nos ayuda a organizar nuestra arquitectura según el mapa mental de nuestro usuario.

Complexity is everywhere, from forms to interfaces. While we strive for simplicity, intricate businesses like Apple and Amazon require creative solutions. We must reflect their diverse sections minimally and effectively, making information architecture our key weapon. By strategically structuring a website's map, we ensure user and search engine satisfaction. Clear hierarchies, logical navigation, and key content prioritization are our allies. By prioritizing user experience, we transform daunting sitemaps into elegant guides. In our information-saturated world, guiding users efficiently and clearly is the ultimate design victory. ???????????? ?????????? ??????????????!

O Google n?o tem problemas em ler sitemaps grandes, ele dá conta. Mas é melhor dividir seus sitemaps sempre que possível, pois isso ajuda muito na hora de conferir como anda a indexa??o das páginas no relatório de "Páginas" no GSC.

A simplicidade e clareza do sitemap s?o essenciais. Um sitemap confuso ou muito complexo pode dificultar a compreens?o dos motores de busca e, consequentemente, impactar a eficiência da indexa??o.

No solo la arquitectura de la información desordenada desorienta a nuestros usuarios. Tener que sumergirse mucho en una web puede hacer que cualquier usuario naufrague en su propósito. Es por esto que es preferible tener sitios con diferentes temas a tener un sitio con todo. El que mucho abarca poco aprieta dice el dicho.

Além do GSC, coloque o endere?o do seu sitemap no robots, n?o vai fazer mau algum. Vale lembrar que o endere?o e nome do arquivo podem ser variados, desde que o endere?o esteja dentro do domínio verificado no GSC e o arquivo seja legível. é comum o GSC apresentar erros de leitura e corrigir esses erros aparentes um dia depois.

Ningún usuario va a ir a buscar el mapa del sitio. Es un elemento obsoleto de los 90 que ni siquiera sirve hoy en día para la indexación de los sitios.

Além de afetar usabilidade e SEO, um sitemap fora do padr?o pode dificultar futuras manuten??es - principalmente se elas forem realizadas por outro profissional. Seguir as boas práticas é sempre recomendável.

If submitting your sitemap to Google Search Console, Google usually asks for it in XML format. It's helpful to stick with this format as you can then tell Google to re-index your site, rather than waiting for Google to do this naturally weeks or months later.

In my experience, many organizations build their site maps representative of how their organization is structured versus thinking about how their varying users come to their site to accomplish tasks. I often liken a website experience to shopping in a grocery store. You go in to find nuts, you’ll find them in the produce section, in the baking isle, and near the chips and snacks. Depending upon what you need the nuts for, is how you’ll find the nuts that you need to accomplish your task.

It's interesting that the majority of comments relate to SEO and search engines, whereas this topic is in IA which is all about the end user. The most common mistake is to not test out your site structure and navigation with real users, but to design it using internal resources that already know where content is to be found. Also, not using the insights from analytics to make changes, see if there is an improvement and then refine the sitemap. If you are refining/redesigning your IA, there are plenty of tools to evaluate how quickly and easily users achieve their goal.

In building a sitemap it should be very clear the user, ux, business goals for the effort -- balancing current and future perspectives, working closely with XFN to iterate and explore the output and purpose for the exercise.

Avoid a structure that’s too flat or too deep. Setting and labeling categories or grouping should generally follow the rule of 7. 8 or more options? Consider subcategories. Of course, there are exceptions, but following this rule will result in manageable navigation and menus.

Um erro comum é acreditar que o sitemap é a pe?a fundamental da indexa??o. Ele é um indicador útil para o rastreador descobrir e rastrear novamente suas urls, mas ele n?o é garantia de indexa??o, qui?á de posicionamento. Facilidade de rastreamento e renderiza??o das páginas, arquitetura do site s?o pontos técnicos importantes. A qualidade e relevancia do conteúdo, autoridade geral do site podem prejudicar ou ajudar sua indexa??o. Eu já peguei casos onde o sitemap n?o era o problema, mas sim estes fatores.