登录查看更多内容

What are the most common labeling errors in CV data annotation for Robotics?

由人工智能和领英社区提供技术支持

Computer vision (CV) is a crucial component of robotics, as it enables robots to perceive and interact with their environment. However, CV models rely on high-quality data annotation to learn and perform tasks accurately. Data annotation is the process of labeling images or videos with relevant information, such as objects, actions, or attributes. In this article, we will discuss some of the most common labeling errors in CV data annotation for robotics and how to avoid them.

此文章中的业界达人

由社区从 5 条内容中精选。了解更多

Steven Mcgough

Embedded Technology and IOT Rebel | Passionate about Technology | Sparking Innovation for Future-Ready Solutions
Himanshu Gautam

Crafting the Future with AR-VR tech at Meta: Software Engineer Specializing in Proto Test | VSLAM | 3D Computer Vision…
Arivukkarasan Raja, PhD

IT Director @ AstraZeneca | Expert in Enterprise Solution Architecture & Applied AI | Robotics & IoT | Digital…

1 Inconsistent labels

One of the most common labeling errors is inconsistency, which means using different names, formats, or standards for the same or similar concepts. For example, if you label a car as "vehicle" in one image and as "car" in another, or if you use different colors or shapes for the same label, you will confuse the CV model and reduce its performance. To avoid inconsistency, you should define and follow clear labeling guidelines, use standardized vocabularies and ontologies, and check and correct any discrepancies.

添加您的观点

Steven Mcgough

Embedded Technology and IOT Rebel | Passionate about Technology | Sparking Innovation for Future-Ready Solutions
举报内容
Inconsistent labeling, where annotations vary across images or frames, is a prevalent error in computer vision data annotation for robotics. This inconsistency can stem from differences in annotator interpretation, annotation guidelines, or labeling tools. It undermines model training by introducing ambiguity and noise, impacting the algorithm's ability to generalize effectively. To mitigate this, ensuring clear annotation guidelines, rigorous quality control, and inter-annotator agreement checks are essential steps in the annotation process.

已翻译

赞

2 Inaccurate labels

Another common labeling error is inaccuracy, which means using wrong or misleading labels for the data. For example, if you label a dog as a cat, or if you label a partial or occluded object as a whole object, you will introduce errors and noise into the data. To avoid inaccuracy, you should verify and validate the labels, use multiple sources and references, and use tools and techniques that can handle complex or ambiguous scenarios.

添加您的观点

Himanshu Gautam

Crafting the Future with AR-VR tech at Meta: Software Engineer Specializing in Proto Test | VSLAM | 3D Computer Vision | Machine Learning | WPI |
举报内容
Employing inter-annotator agreement (IAA) metrics during the labeling process can quantify the consistency between labelers, helping identify potential inaccuracies. Active learning techniques can prioritize labeling for data points with the highest uncertainty, which can be particularly useful for complex or ambiguous scenarios.

已翻译

赞

3 Incomplete labels

A third common labeling error is incompleteness, which means leaving out or missing some important labels for the data. For example, if you label only some of the objects in an image, or if you label only some of the frames in a video, you will limit the scope and diversity of the data. To avoid incompleteness, you should label all the relevant and required elements, use tools and techniques that can automate or speed up the labeling process, and review and update the labels as needed.

添加您的观点

Steven Mcgough

Embedded Technology and IOT Rebel | Passionate about Technology | Sparking Innovation for Future-Ready Solutions
举报内容
Incomplete labeling is a common error in computer vision data annotation for robotics. This occurs when objects or features within an image are not fully annotated, leading to gaps or missing information in the labeled data. Incomplete labels can arise due to various factors such as occlusions, ambiguous boundaries, or annotator oversight. These errors can adversely affect the performance of robotic systems, particularly in tasks requiring accurate object detection or recognition. To address this issue, annotators should receive thorough training, annotation guidelines should be clearly defined, and quality control measures should be implemented to ensure comprehensive labeling of all relevant objects or features in the data.

已翻译

赞

4 Irrelevant labels

A fourth common labeling error is irrelevance, which means using labels that are not related or useful for the specific CV task or domain. For example, if you label the color or shape of an object that is not relevant for the robot's action, or if you label the background or noise that is not relevant for the robot's perception, you will waste time and resources and dilute the data. To avoid irrelevance, you should focus on the labels that are aligned with the robot's goal and context, use tools and techniques that can filter or segment the data, and remove or ignore any unnecessary labels.

添加您的观点

Himanshu Gautam

Crafting the Future with AR-VR tech at Meta: Software Engineer Specializing in Proto Test | VSLAM | 3D Computer Vision | Machine Learning | WPI |
举报内容
Domain-specific knowledge graphs can guide the labeling process towards task-relevant information. Active learning techniques can be employed to iteratively query the human annotator for labels only on the most informative and uncertain data points, improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the labeling process.

已翻译

赞

5 Incompatible labels

A fifth common labeling error is incompatibility, which means using labels that are not compatible or consistent with the CV model or framework. For example, if you label the data with a different format or structure than the model expects, or if you label the data with a different level of granularity or abstraction than the model supports, you will cause errors and conflicts and reduce the efficiency and effectiveness of the model. To avoid incompatibility, you should understand and follow the specifications and requirements of the model or framework, use tools and techniques that can convert or adapt the labels, and test and optimize the labels for the model or framework.

添加您的观点

6 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

添加您的观点

Arivukkarasan Raja, PhD

IT Director @ AstraZeneca | Expert in Enterprise Solution Architecture & Applied AI | Robotics & IoT | Digital Transformation | Strategic Vision for Business Growth Through Emerging Tech
举报内容
Labelling errors in robotics computer vision data annotation can affect performance and safety. Misalignment, occlusion, ambiguity, border detection, size and perspective, misclassification, labelling noise, temporal consistency, class imbalance, and inadequate annotations are common mistakes. These errors can be caused by human error, annotation tool faults, and item appearance or category changes. Quality control, clear criteria, many rounds of review by expert annotators, and advanced annotation tools can increase labelled data quality. Advanced annotation tools and strategies can reduce these errors and increase labelled dataset accuracy.

已翻译

赞

Robotics

+ 关注

给文章评分

我们借助人工智能创建了此文章。您认为这篇文章怎么样？

很棒不太好

举报此文章

查看全部

What are the most common labeling errors in CV data annotation for Robotics?

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 Inconsistent labels

2 Inaccurate labels

3 Incomplete labels

4 Irrelevant labels

5 Incompatible labels

6 Here’s what else to consider

Robotics

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

更多Robotics相关文章

更多相关阅读内容

What are the most common labeling errors in CV data annotation for Robotics?

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 Inconsistent labels

2 Inaccurate labels

3 Incomplete labels

4 Irrelevant labels

5 Incompatible labels

6 Here’s what else to consider

Robotics

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

查看其他技能