Interpreting the results of a MANOVA requires answering several questions, such as whether there is a significant difference among the groups on the combination of dependent variables, which dependent variables contribute to the difference, and which groups differ from each other and on which dependent variables. For example, if a MANOVA was conducted to compare the math, science, and language test scores of students from three majors - engineering, humanities, and social sciences - and it was found that the MANOVA was significant using the Wilks' Lambda criterion with a p-value of 0.001, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference among the majors on the combination of test scores. Furthermore, looking at the Between-Subjects Effects table showed that all three test scores were significant with p-values of 0.000, 0.002, and 0.004 respectively. Additionally, running a post-hoc test revealed that engineering students scored higher than humanities and social sciences students on math and science tests but lower than humanities students on language test; humanities students scored higher than social sciences students on language test but lower than them on math and science tests; and social sciences students scored lower than engineering and humanities students on language test but higher than humanities students on math and science tests. In summary, the MANOVA showed that the majors had a significant effect on the math, science, and language test scores of the students with engineering students excelling in math and science but struggling in language; humanities students performing well in language but poorly in math and science; and social sciences students having a balanced performance across the three tests.