Last updated on 2024年7月12日

What are the main advantages of using SPE over liquid-liquid extraction (LLE)?

由人工智能和领英社区提供技术支持

Liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) is a common method for isolating and concentrating analytes from complex matrices, such as biological fluids, environmental samples, or food products. However, LLE has some drawbacks, such as high solvent consumption, low recovery, and emulsion formation. Solid phase extraction (SPE) is an alternative technique that can overcome these limitations and offer several advantages over LLE. In this article, we will explore what SPE is, how it works, and why it is superior to LLE in terms of efficiency, selectivity, and environmental impact.

在这篇协作文章中查找专家回答

由社区从 2 条内容中精选。了解更多

1 What is SPE?

SPE is a sample preparation method that uses a solid material, called a sorbent, to selectively retain the analytes of interest from a liquid sample, called a mobile phase. The sorbent is usually packed in a cartridge, a disk, or a well plate, and the sample is passed through it under vacuum or pressure. The analytes are then eluted from the sorbent with a small volume of a suitable solvent, called an eluent. The eluent contains the concentrated and purified analytes, ready for further analysis.

添加您的观点

2 How does SPE work?

SPE works based on the interactions between the analytes, the sorbent, and the mobile phase. Depending on the nature of these interactions, different modes of SPE can be used, such as reversed-phase, normal-phase, ion-exchange, or affinity. The choice of the sorbent and the mobile phase depends on the polarity, charge, and affinity of the analytes. The goal is to achieve a high retention of the analytes on the sorbent, while minimizing the retention of the interfering compounds. The eluent should be able to disrupt the interactions between the analytes and the sorbent, and elute them with high recovery and low solvent consumption.

添加您的观点

3 Why is SPE more efficient than LLE?

SPE is more efficient than LLE because it requires less time, labor, and solvent. LLE involves multiple steps of shaking, separating, and transferring the organic and aqueous phases, which can be tedious and time-consuming. LLE also requires large volumes of organic solvents, which can be expensive and hazardous. SPE, on the other hand, simplifies the extraction process by using a single cartridge or disk, which can be automated and integrated with other analytical instruments. SPE also reduces the solvent volume and waste, as the eluent is usually a fraction of the sample volume.

添加您的观点

Neeba Wilson

Clinical Research, Biotechnology professional, Scientific writer and Educator
举报内容
The most advantageous thing about SPE methods is the less solvent consumption. Because of decreased evaporation, less solvent is used and it also allows better extraction. For my projects on secondary metabolite extraction from plant extracts, I have got excellent results with HPTLC (SPE) methods which would not have been possible with conventional methods.

已翻译

赞

4 Why is SPE more selective than LLE?

SPE is more selective than LLE because it offers a wider range of sorbent materials and mechanisms to target specific analytes. LLE relies on the partition coefficient of the analytes between the organic and aqueous phases, which can be affected by factors such as pH, temperature, and salinity. LLE also suffers from co-extraction of unwanted compounds, such as lipids, proteins, or salts, which can interfere with the analysis or damage the analytical column. SPE, on the other hand, allows for the fine-tuning of the sorbent properties and the mobile phase composition to achieve optimal separation and enrichment of the analytes. SPE also enables the removal of interfering compounds by using wash steps or selective elution.

添加您的观点

5 Why is SPE more environmentally friendly than LLE?

SPE is more environmentally friendly than LLE because it reduces the generation and disposal of organic solvents. Organic solvents are harmful to human health and the environment, as they can cause respiratory problems, skin irritation, fire hazards, or pollution. LLE consumes large amounts of organic solvents, which need to be properly stored, handled, and disposed of. SPE, on the other hand, minimizes the solvent usage and waste, as the eluent is usually a small fraction of the sample volume. SPE also allows for the reuse or regeneration of the sorbent materials, which can extend their lifetime and lower their cost.

添加您的观点

Neeba Wilson

Clinical Research, Biotechnology professional, Scientific writer and Educator
举报内容
If I take the example of HPTLC, SPE offers the avoidance of any toxic reagents to be sprayed for analyte detection. In fact, it only needs to scraped out for further analysis. This certainly means a more feasible and environmentally efficient approach to avoid tedious steps and unnecessary waste.

已翻译

赞

6 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

添加您的观点

Sample Preparation

+ 关注

给文章评分

我们借助人工智能创建了此文章。您认为这篇文章怎么样？

很棒不太好

举报此文章

查看全部

What are the main advantages of using SPE over liquid-liquid extraction (LLE)?

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 What is SPE?

2 How does SPE work?

3 Why is SPE more efficient than LLE?

4 Why is SPE more selective than LLE?

5 Why is SPE more environmentally friendly than LLE?

6 Here’s what else to consider

Sample Preparation

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

更多Sample Preparation相关文章

更多相关阅读内容