What do you do if your fundraising team is divided on a strategy?

Explore both paths! Take a pro/con approach and follow the strategy for a few paces each. Usually, a natural conclusion can be made by gathering enough info/ perspectives/ input.

dès le début de la campagne il est impératif de se mettre d'accord sur une stratégie claire ;une fois celle ci élaborée et validée par la majorité des membres on se tient à cette stratégie il est hors de question de la discuter tant que l'opération n'est pas finie c'est pour ceci que au préalable il faut avoir un objectif clair et atteignable . on peu éventuellement moduler les efforts si on se rend compte qu'il est plus rentable de contacter les institutionnels que les individus ou l'inverse on peu et on doit s'adapter mais on garde la stratégie initiale

If your fundraising team is divided on a strategy: 1. Gather all relevant data and ensure everyone has the same information. 2. Allow each side to present their rationale and evidence through respectful discussion. 3. Identify the core issues causing the divide by separating facts from opinions. 4. Look for areas of overlap that could lead to compromise. If consensus can't be reached, consider a team vote. 5. As the leader, you may need to make the final decision, striving to incorporate the best of both perspectives. 6. Commit to re-evaluating and potentially adjusting the strategy based on results and consistent data review.

It is important to listen to all concerns and thank each member for the contribution. They should feel appreciated and always free to air out their views.

Focus on the common goals, and try implementing a needs assessment to ensure everyone understands the gaps and what needs to be done. Try co-creating solutions with the team - it works most of the times

While the democratic approach to resolving the issue presents itself to be efficient, it is not always the case. Sometimes, this divide might come because both teams are equally passionate about their approach, with both approaches directly in line with the fundraising goals. As a leader, the decision falls in your hands to provide a meaningful resolution to the divide. This might mean finding some common ground, merging both approaches, outrightly choosing one and placing the other in the pipeline, building a new approach all together, etc. Sometimes, democracy doesn't solve the issue, the leader has to step up and make the call. This doesn't however eradicate the potency of the democratic approach, and that it should be used first.

When your fundraising team is divided on a strategy, start by evaluating the options objectively. Use tools like SWOT analysis or decision matrices to weigh the pros and cons. Seek input from key stakeholders and consider using collaborative tools like Trello or Asana for transparent decision-making. Keep the focus on the end goal and prioritize alignment over individual preferences.

The evaluation of options should not just be a matter of listing pros and cons but also harnessing the team's collective insights. Engaging in strategic dialogue allows for the cross-pollination of ideas, leading to more robust and resilient fundraising strategies well-informed by diverse perspectives

1. After acknowledging concerns, collectively evaluate the proposed options. 2. Encourage team members to weigh the pros and cons of each strategy. 3. Foster a democratic and inclusive process for option evaluation. 4. Allow every member to contribute insights and perspectives. 5. Identify the most feasible and effective strategies through collective analysis. 6. Ensure the chosen strategy aligns with fundraising goals and available resources. 7. Consider potential risks, challenges, and mitigation plans for each option. 8. Remain open-minded and objective during the evaluation process. 9. Leverage diverse expertise within the team for comprehensive assessments. 10. Aim for a consensus-driven decision that unites the team.

Establish and clearly communicate the goal of the fundraising activity. Then facilitate conversations how to reach the goal. Make sure everyone understands their ideas are valued. Be sensitive and aware of the influence of each person’s culture on their perspective and be intentional about providing everyone the opportunity to express their ideas. Brainstorm strategies to reach the goal reflecting as much as possible what everyone expressed. The leader takes the responsibility to summarize a plan and then support the group coming to consensus with the final plan.

1. After evaluating options, guide the team towards finding common ground. 2. Consensus doesn't require unanimous agreement, but majority support is crucial. 3. Be open to compromising and making adjustments to accommodate different viewpoints. 4. Foster a collaborative environment where everyone feels heard and valued. 5. Highlight the shared goal of achieving successful fundraising outcomes. 6. Emphasize the strengths and benefits of the consensus strategy. 7. Address remaining concerns and outline mitigation plans transparently. 8. Encourage team members to voice their commitment to the chosen path. 9. A consensus-driven approach cultivates collective ownership and buy-in. 10. United execution is more effective than fragmented efforts.

Achieving consensus in a divided team requires patience and inclusive deliberation. By creating a space where all opinions are considered and compromises are made in good faith, the team can unite behind a shared vision. This collective decision-making process not only enriches the strategy but also enhances team solidarity and commitment to the chosen course of action

While achieving consensus is a worthy and sometimes essential objective in any organizational undertaking, there must be a clear voice that emerges. Unfortunately, some might feel that their contributions were discounted in the final result. Going back to the organization's mission, vision, and values can be a critical step in ensuring the authority of the decision. We must ask whether each element of the approach is in alignment with them. This can often provide the tipping point for consensus.

What if consensus to break the gridlock is eluding even after efforts to consensus not going anywhere? Straight up consensus is all about cooperation between people where there is no pecking order i.e equals on the table. Just draw out a map of all the best ideas or suggestions while addressing all key issues or concerns placed on the table. It may be possible we may find some plan of action that may surprise and possibly result in an innovative actionable plan. It is simple we cannot get things done if we rail-road our agenda as we need everyone on the table to be involved. Minority needs and opinions have to be considered.

When your fundraising team is divided on a strategy, implement a decision-making framework like DACI (Driver, Approver, Contributors, Informed). Use tools like Asana or Trello for collaborative planning, and ensure clear communication channels with regular updates through Slack or Microsoft Teams. Focus on data-driven discussions and encourage constructive feedback to align everyone towards the chosen strategy.

It’s important to get everyone’s feedback on the team when it comes to fundraising. There comes a point in time when things need to be implemented. Meeting regularly to communicate what the plan is and having a shared place where teams can work out of. Being flexible with a plan can allow for success!

Monitor Progress: Utilize project management tools such as Monday.com or Jira to track tasks and milestones efficiently. Leverage analytics tools like Google Analytics or Hotjar to gain data-driven insights and make informed decisions. Foster open communication and collaboration within the team using platforms like Slack or Microsoft Teams to ensure alignment on fundraising strategies.

1. Monitoring progress is an ongoing process, not a one-time event. 2. Set up regular check-ins to assess the fundraising strategy's unfolding. 3. Rely on data and metrics to objectively evaluate strategy effectiveness. 4. Be prepared to make adjustments to the strategy as needed. 5. Continuous monitoring maintains team unity and alignment. 6. Regular check-ins allow for dialogue and reassessment opportunities. 7. Keeping everyone involved sustains motivation and commitment. 8. Celebrate milestones and successes along the way. 9. Address challenges transparently and collaboratively. 10. Adapt the strategy iteratively based on lessons learned.

First, assess the differing viewpoints objectively. Use tools like SWOT analysis to understand strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of each strategy. Next, facilitate open discussions to find common ground and alignment. Leverage collaboration tools like Trello or Asana to track progress and ensure everyone stays informed and accountable. Adjust strategies as needed based on data and feedback from stakeholders to achieve optimal results.

When you disagree with decision makers, two key things to consider: 1. Always Cultivate Trust - Even if you disagree with your superiors, operate in a way that they have your support and trust. Never undermine. Use your best judgment, present the options, and if it doesn't work out, use it as a learning experience. 2. Get Creative with Your Perspective - If your perspective or recommendation isn't well-received initially, you might need to get creative to position your recommendation differently in a way that might be better received. 3. Be Patient - Sometimes, if the initial way doesn't succeed, you may have a future opportunity to suggest an alternative. These are teaching moments in creating a culture of philanthropy.

My first consideration would be is it feasible to implement trails of multiple strategies? if so set your the trial timeline and KPI’s you’ll use it to measure the effectiveness of each strategy.