登录查看更多内容

What do you do if your architectural decisions lack logical reasoning?

由人工智能和领英社区提供技术支持

As an architect, you need to make decisions that are not only creative and aesthetic, but also rational and coherent. Logical reasoning is the ability to apply rules, principles, and evidence to solve problems and justify arguments. It is essential for designing buildings and structures that are functional, safe, and sustainable. However, sometimes you may face situations where your architectural decisions lack logical reasoning, either because of external constraints, personal biases, or cognitive errors. What do you do in such cases? How do you improve your logical reasoning skills and avoid making illogical decisions? Here are some tips and strategies to help you.

此文章中的业界达人

由社区从 6 条内容中精选。了解更多

Godsent Columbus

Candidate Architect | BIM Professional | 3D Products Enthusiasts | Afrocentric Inspired Design | International Finance…
Zivai Mamutse

Candidate Architect | Computational Designer | Parametric Modeling Expert

1 Identify the problem

The first step is to recognize that your architectural decisions lack logical reasoning. You may notice this when you encounter feedback, criticism, or questions from your clients, colleagues, or stakeholders that challenge your assumptions, methods, or outcomes. Alternatively, you may realize this yourself when you review your work and find inconsistencies, gaps, or flaws in your design. To identify the problem, you need to be open-minded, humble, and willing to admit your mistakes. You also need to be specific about what aspect of your decision is illogical and why.

添加您的观点

Godsent Columbus

Candidate Architect | BIM Professional | 3D Products Enthusiasts | Afrocentric Inspired Design | International Finance Corporation (IFC) Awardee.
举报内容
-Review your work and identify inconsistencies, gaps, or flaws in your design. -Be open to the possibility that your assumptions may need reevaluation. -You should also aim to be receptive to constructive criticism and feedback.

已翻译

赞
Zivai Mamutse

Candidate Architect | Computational Designer | Parametric Modeling Expert
举报内容
If you realize that your architectural decisions lack logical reasoning, it's important to address the issue promptly to ensure the success and efficiency of your project. Identify the Gaps: Review your architectural decisions and try to pinpoint where the logical reasoning is lacking. Identify any assumptions made during the decision-making process and assess their validity. Engage Stakeholders: Consult with relevant stakeholders, including team members, clients, and experts, to gather diverse perspectives. Share your concerns about the lack of logical reasoning and seek input from others to identify blind spots.

已翻译

赞
Ar. Sulaiman Alhudaithy

Assistant Design Manager @ Albaltan Group | Lead Architect | LEED AP, Mostadam AP | Sustainable design expert creating eco-friendly buildings for a greener future
举报内容
Many architects rely on uniqueness in their design, yet they may forget that clients are not inside the architect's head to understand the reason behind this unique design. This is a common example of the lack of logic, which does not necessarily mean that it does not exist, yet it is not provided clearly. To identify the problem, communicate the lack of understanding with your client and justify your design choices whether technical or subjective.

已翻译

赞

2 Analyze the causes

The next step is to analyze the causes of your illogical decision. There may be different factors that influence your reasoning process, such as time pressure, budget limitations, information overload, or emotional attachment. You may also have some cognitive biases that affect your judgment, such as confirmation bias, anchoring bias, or availability bias. To analyze the causes, you need to be objective, critical, and reflective. You also need to gather relevant data, evidence, and feedback to support your analysis.

添加您的观点

Zivai Mamutse

Candidate Architect | Computational Designer | Parametric Modeling Expert
举报内容
Reassess Requirements: Revisit the project requirements to ensure that your architectural decisions align with the project goals and objectives. Verify that your decisions address both functional and non-functional requirements. Perform Risk Analysis: Conduct a risk analysis to identify potential pitfalls associated with your architectural decisions. Prioritize risks based on their potential impact on the project and take steps to mitigate them. Benchmark Against Best Practices: Compare your architectural decisions against industry best practices and standards. Ensure that your choices align with established guidelines and principles within the relevant domain.

已翻译

赞

3 Explore alternatives

The third step is to explore alternatives to your illogical decision. You may have overlooked some options, possibilities, or perspectives that could improve your design or solve your problem. You may also have some assumptions, preferences, or habits that limit your creativity or innovation. To explore alternatives, you need to be curious, flexible, and imaginative. You also need to use various techniques, such as brainstorming, sketching, or prototyping, to generate and test different ideas.

添加您的观点

4 Evaluate the consequences

The fourth step is to evaluate the consequences of your illogical decision. You may have some negative impacts, risks, or trade-offs that affect your design quality, performance, or sustainability. You may also have some ethical, social, or environmental implications that affect your design responsibility, reputation, or legacy. To evaluate the consequences, you need to be realistic, pragmatic, and foresighted. You also need to use various tools, such as simulations, models, or scenarios, to assess and compare different outcomes.

添加您的观点

Ar. Sulaiman Alhudaithy

Assistant Design Manager @ Albaltan Group | Lead Architect | LEED AP, Mostadam AP | Sustainable design expert creating eco-friendly buildings for a greener future
举报内容
A good example we can review is color choices. There are many grounds to color choosing and sometimes they can be conflicting, and the outcome may be subjected to consequences. Architects may choose colors based on the project's occupational function and the business background. Some businesses are presented as bright colors, which when implemented, may offer a low SRI. However, the architect must evaluate the consequence of choosing the business colors, and if it is presented to be impacting negatively, the architect may request a change of color.

已翻译

赞

5 Implement the solution

The fifth step is to implement the solution to your illogical decision. You may have to revise, modify, or redesign some aspects of your work to make it more logical, coherent, and convincing. You may also have to communicate, explain, or justify your changes to your clients, colleagues, or stakeholders to gain their approval, trust, or support. To implement the solution, you need to be decisive, confident, and persuasive. You also need to use various methods, such as documentation, presentation, or demonstration, to showcase and validate your work.

添加您的观点

6 Learn from the experience

The final step is to learn from the experience of making an illogical decision. You may have some lessons, insights, or tips that can help you improve your logical reasoning skills and avoid making similar mistakes in the future. You may also have some feedback, suggestions, or recommendations that can help you enhance your design practice and professional development. To learn from the experience, you need to be proactive, positive, and motivated. You also need to use various resources, such as books, courses, or mentors, to expand your knowledge and skills.

添加您的观点

7 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

添加您的观点

Zivai Mamutse

Candidate Architect | Computational Designer | Parametric Modeling Expert
举报内容
Document Decisions: Clearly document the rationale behind each architectural decision. This documentation will help in understanding the reasoning and can be valuable for future reference. Iterate and Refine: Be open to iteration and refinement. If a decision lacks logical reasoning, consider adjusting it based on new insights or feedback. Foster a culture that encourages continuous improvement and learning from mistakes. Seek Expert Advice: If you are uncertain about certain aspects, don't hesitate to seek advice from domain experts or mentors. Collaborate with experienced professionals who can provide valuable insights and guidance. Learn and Train: Invest time in learning from your experiences.

已翻译

赞

Architecture

+ 关注

给文章评分

我们借助人工智能创建了此文章。您认为这篇文章怎么样？

很棒不太好

举报此文章

查看全部

What do you do if your architectural decisions lack logical reasoning?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 Identify the problem

2 Analyze the causes

3 Explore alternatives

4 Evaluate the consequences

5 Implement the solution

6 Learn from the experience

7 Here’s what else to consider

Architecture

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

更多Architecture相关文章

更多相关阅读内容