What are common geophysical data interpretation mistakes to avoid?

1 Mistake 1: Ignoring the data quality and acquisition parameters

One of the first steps in geophysical data interpretation is to assess the quality and reliability of the data. This means checking for noise, artifacts, gaps, outliers, and inconsistencies in the data. It also means understanding the acquisition parameters, such as the source and receiver characteristics, the survey geometry, the sampling frequency, and the processing steps. Ignoring these factors can lead to erroneous or misleading interpretations, as they can affect the resolution, sensitivity, and accuracy of the data.

2 Mistake 2: Relying too much on a single data type or method

Geophysical data interpretation is often a multi-disciplinary and multi-method approach, as different data types and methods can provide complementary or contrasting information about the subsurface. Relying too much on a single data type or method can limit your perspective and miss important features or anomalies. For example, seismic data can provide high-resolution images of the subsurface structure, but may not be sensitive to the physical properties or composition of the rocks. Gravity and magnetic data can provide information about the density and magnetization contrasts, but may not be able to resolve the depth or shape of the sources. Electrical and electromagnetic data can provide information about the resistivity and conductivity variations, but may be affected by cultural noise or surface effects. Therefore, it is advisable to use multiple data types and methods, and to compare and integrate them in a consistent and coherent way.

3 Mistake 3: Over-interpreting or under-interpreting the data

Another common geophysical data interpretation mistake is to over-interpret or under-interpret the data. Over-interpretation means reading too much into the data and making unwarranted or unrealistic assumptions or inferences. Under-interpretation means ignoring or dismissing relevant or significant features or anomalies in the data. Both over-interpretation and under-interpretation can result from cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias, anchoring bias, or availability bias. To avoid these biases, it is important to be critical and objective in your interpretation, and to test and validate your hypotheses with independent data or information.

4 Mistake 4: Not considering the scale and context of the data

Geophysical data interpretation also requires considering the scale and context of the data. This means recognizing the spatial and temporal variations and limitations of the data, and relating them to the geological and geophysical processes and models. For example, seismic data can have different scales of resolution and frequency depending on the wavelength and velocity of the seismic waves. Gravity and magnetic data can have different scales of sensitivity and ambiguity depending on the distance and orientation of the sources. Electrical and electromagnetic data can have different scales of penetration and complexity depending on the resistivity and conductivity of the subsurface. Therefore, it is essential to consider the scale and context of the data, and to match them with the appropriate interpretation tools and techniques.

5 Mistake 5: Not communicating or presenting the data and interpretation clearly

The final step in geophysical data interpretation is to communicate or present the data and interpretation clearly and effectively. This means using appropriate visualizations, maps, cross-sections, profiles, models, and graphs to display the data and interpretation. It also means using clear and concise language, terminology, symbols, and labels to describe the data and interpretation. It also means providing sufficient and relevant information, such as the data sources, methods, assumptions, uncertainties, and limitations, to support the data and interpretation. Not communicating or presenting the data and interpretation clearly can lead to confusion, misunderstanding, or misinterpretation by the audience or the stakeholders.

Geophysical data interpretation is a challenging but rewarding skill that can help you understand the subsurface and solve geological and geophysical problems. By avoiding these common geophysical data interpretation mistakes, you can improve your interpretation skills and deliver more reliable and useful results.

6 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?