What are the challenges of writing from an unreliable narrator's perspective?

I think that crafting trust with readers have a lot to do with consistency. Most fiction stories get people's attention because of the consistency of the characters in the stories. So, even though they might not be real people, the reader becomes emotionally invested in the story, in anticipation of what would happen to their favorite character at the end.

Crafting an unreliable narrator's story involves walking a fine line with reader trust. You need to make them believable enough to keep readers engaged while dropping hints about their unreliability. It's like building a puzzle where you reveal just enough to keep readers guessing, but not too much to ruin the surprise. You want readers to trust the narrator, even as you subtly show that they might not be as reliable as they seem. It's a delicate balance that requires careful crafting and attention to detail to get just right.

Writer's block is a very big problem. When a writer suffers from writer's block, it can be overwhelming sometimes because you're stuck at one point and it seems you can't move forward, just stuck in a maze. Another thing is consistency and motivation.

Keeping an unreliable narrator's story consistent is quite the juggling act. You have to make sure their lies and contradictions stay in line throughout the narrative, without tipping your hand too early. It's like weaving a complex web where every thread needs to connect just right. Readers need to be able to follow along without getting lost in the narrator's deception, so you've got to keep things coherent while still keeping them guessing. It's a challenge that requires careful planning and attention to detail to pull off successfully.

Balancing subtlety in an unreliable narrator's story is like walking a tightrope. You want to drop hints about their unreliability without hitting readers over the head with it. It's like leaving breadcrumbs for readers to follow, giving them just enough to piece things together on their own. You've got to be sly enough to keep readers intrigued without giving away the whole game too soon. It's a delicate dance that requires finesse and a keen eye for timing to get right.

Engaging readers with an unreliable narrator is like a suspenseful game of cat and mouse. You want to keep them hooked with the narrator's story, while also teasing them with hints that things might not be as they seem. It's about creating a sense of intrigue and mystery that keeps readers turning the pages, eager to uncover the truth. You've got to strike the right balance between revealing enough to keep readers invested, but not so much that the suspense fizzles out. It's a delicate balance that requires skillful storytelling and a deep understanding of what keeps readers on the edge of their seats.

The most important way to get your reader to open your book or article is to make your title catchy. However, to keep your reader engaged, you have to get them addicted to reading the story by satisfying the reason for which they opened the book in the first place at each stage. If your readers didn't satisfy their curiosity which led them to read the book, or if your title is simply deceptive, they'll quickly give up on the first page. To win their prolonged attention, your book needs to be engaging. Don't over satisfy them in the beginning, but make them want to turn over the next page until the end.

Juggling the complexity of clues in an unreliable narrator's story is like solving a puzzle with constantly shifting pieces. You need to drop subtle hints throughout the narrative that suggest the narrator might not be telling the whole truth, without making it too obvious. It's like scattering breadcrumbs for readers to follow, leading them down a twisting path of deception and revelation. Each clue needs to add depth to the story while keeping readers guessing about what's really going on. It's a challenging balancing act that requires careful planning and attention to detail to pull off effectively.