登录查看更多内容

What are the challenges in formulating a research hypothesis in interdisciplinary studies?

由人工智能和领英社区提供技术支持

Embarking on interdisciplinary research is akin to navigating a complex maze where different academic disciplines intersect. The initial challenge lies in defining a research hypothesis that adequately bridges these diverse fields. Unlike discipline-specific studies, where the hypothesis is grounded in a well-established framework, interdisciplinary research requires synthesizing disparate theories and methodologies. This synthesis must be coherent, relevant, and innovative to foster a meaningful investigation that respects the nuances of each discipline involved. Crafting such a hypothesis demands not only a deep understanding of the individual fields but also an ability to foresee how they can effectively interlink to address a novel research question.

此文章中的业界达人

由社区从 4 条内容中精选。了解更多

Mirko Peters

Digital Marketing Analyst @ Sivantos

1 Scope Balance

Striking the right balance in scope is a delicate task when formulating an interdisciplinary research hypothesis. You must ensure that the hypothesis is neither too narrow, limiting the potential for interdisciplinary integration, nor too broad, making it difficult to conduct focused and manageable research. A hypothesis that is too specialized may fail to incorporate the breadth of knowledge available from other disciplines, while one that is overly expansive can lead to a scattered and superficial inquiry. The challenge is to find a sweet spot where the hypothesis is sufficiently precise to guide the research while remaining open to interdisciplinary insights.

添加您的观点

Jessie Lydia Henshaw

Growing to Harmony -OR- Growing to Tragedy ... A choice to make …
举报内容
I had a very good answer to this before, but I’m on an iPad and the app erased it when I went to another app to check something. I wish apps didn’t erase your work so regularly. Please try to think of the people you’re using, and try to think of how to serve them instead.

已翻译

赞
Kevin Mendoza (he/him)

PhD in E&M Geophysics | Datascience and Machine Learning | Python Programmer (HPC, ML/DS, Analytics) | Looking to solve complex problems at companies that value innovation
举报内容
The two endmembers of scope definition are 1. concentrating on one person's field and 2. trying to solve every problem. I've found there are a number of ways which can help the team identify an appropriate work scope. - Have discussions early and often about what each team member values and wants to see in the final results - Adopt a common communication style. - Ensure everyone's opinion and insight is given equal weight. This may mean encouraging elements of your team to focus on listening or presenting more than they are used to. - Find time to learn about each other's fields. Remember, science is a collaborative and iterative endeavor. The more this is integrated into your ethos the more productive your team will be.

已翻译

赞

2 Jargon Barriers

One of the hurdles in interdisciplinary research is the jargon barrier. Each discipline comes with its own specialized language, which can impede clear communication and understanding among collaborators from different fields. When formulating a hypothesis, it's crucial to use terminology that is accessible to all participating disciplines. This can be challenging because you must accurately convey complex ideas without oversimplifying them or losing their specificity. Finding common ground in language is essential to ensure that the hypothesis is comprehensible and that all researchers are aligned with the study's objectives.

添加您的观点

Mirko Peters

Digital Marketing Analyst @ Sivantos
举报内容
Jargon barriers present significant challenges in interdisciplinary research, as each field has its specialized language. This diversity in terminology can hinder clear communication among collaborators from various disciplines. When formulating a hypothesis, it's important to use language that is accessible to all participants without oversimplifying complex ideas or compromising their specificity. Achieving clarity and mutual understanding in language ensures the hypothesis is understandable to everyone involved, aligning all researchers with the study's objectives.

已翻译

赞

3 Method Integration

Integrating methodologies from various disciplines to support a single hypothesis poses another significant challenge. You must determine which methods are most appropriate for the research question and how they can be combined coherently. This often involves reconciling different epistemological approaches and data analysis techniques, which can be contentious if disciplinary biases surface. The goal is to create an inclusive methodological framework that leverages the strengths of each discipline while mitigating potential conflicts or inconsistencies.

添加您的观点

4 Epistemic Divergence

Epistemic divergence refers to the varying ways in which different disciplines create and validate knowledge. These differences can make it challenging to formulate a hypothesis that is acceptable across disciplines. You might encounter conflicting paradigms or criteria for what constitutes evidence, making it difficult to establish a common ground for research. Navigating these epistemic variations requires flexibility and an openness to alternative viewpoints, which is essential for developing a robust interdisciplinary hypothesis.

添加您的观点

Antonio Villalpando-Acu?a

Científico social
举报内容
When you face firm disagreements at an epistemic level, you must be ready to settle for just one viewpoint to formulate your working hypothesis. Of course It is desirable to reach synthesis or compromise, but more frequent than not you will do better by just dropping one alternative entirely. That has been my experience as a sociologist and economist. You will probably find less tension between, let us say, sociology and anthopology or economics and American political science. Yey, for the sake of making useful science, keep your hypotheses simple. That is the path for great contributions in my opinion.

已翻译

赞

5 Resource Allocation

In interdisciplinary studies, resource allocation becomes a complex issue when formulating a research hypothesis. You must consider the availability of funding, expertise, and equipment across disciplines and determine how to allocate these resources effectively. The hypothesis should be designed to make optimal use of the diverse resources while ensuring that no single discipline's needs overshadow the others. This demands careful planning and negotiation to align resources with the interdisciplinary aims of the research.

添加您的观点

6 Impact Assessment

Finally, assessing the potential impact of an interdisciplinary research hypothesis is a multifaceted challenge. You must anticipate how the research will contribute to each discipline involved and to the broader field of study. The hypothesis should be positioned to advance knowledge in multiple areas and address complex real-world problems. Evaluating the potential impact requires a forward-thinking approach that considers the long-term implications of the research for academia, industry, and society.

添加您的观点

7 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

添加您的观点

Research Management

+ 关注

给文章评分

我们借助人工智能创建了此文章。您认为这篇文章怎么样？

很棒不太好

举报此文章

查看全部

What are the challenges in formulating a research hypothesis in interdisciplinary studies?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 Scope Balance

2 Jargon Barriers

3 Method Integration

4 Epistemic Divergence

5 Resource Allocation

6 Impact Assessment

7 Here’s what else to consider

Research Management

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

更多Research Management相关文章

更多相关阅读内容