What is the best way to use evidence in an academic paper?

In an academic paper, the best way to use evidence is to ensure that it directly supports your argument or thesis. Use a variety of sources, such as scholarly articles, books, and primary sources, to provide a well-rounded and comprehensive analysis. Properly cite all evidence to give credit to the original source.

The best way to use evidence in an academic paper is to ensure it is relevant, credible, and effectively supports your arguments. Use a combination of primary and secondary sources, critically evaluate the validity and reliability of the evidence, provide clear citations to attribute sources, and contextualize the evidence within the broader academic discourse to strengthen your analysis and conclusions.

Dans le domaine des archives et de la généalogie qui est le mien, il vaut mieux préférer ce qu'on appelle les sources primaires, c'est-à-dire les documents originaux, plut?t que de lire de la bibliographie (même si elle peut s'avérer utile). Ecrire un ouvrage en généalogie sans avoir consulté le moindre document d'archives, comme je peux le voir parfois, est ainsi une hérésie à mon sens.

How do you choose what evidence to use in your writing? I work backwards from the point I'm trying to make. Start by brainstorming all of the main points you want to make, then add the supporting points under each. Now, for EVERY point you will go and find some evidence, a story, or analogy to support it. But here is the most important thing: You also need to find a piece of evidence to the contrary. Without this step you risk writing a biased article which will destroy your credibility. Sources must be reliable and properly cited in every case. Peer-reviewed journals, news articles, research papers. First-hand accounts and interviews. Always find the original source.

There is a difference between introducing evidence from others and your own. Data from other sources are usually presented in the literature review, building the existing body of knowledge. Your own data and evidence are usually presented in the findings section, after the methods. A good academic structure will enable you to publish more easily in good journals.

Dans les mémoires demandés à mes étudiants, je leur donne une règle à respecter : pas d'affirmation de leur part sans preuve ni sans source. Toujours donner les sources en note de bas de page (c'est plus facile pour le lecteur du mémoire de se repérer plut?t que toutes les notes à la fin comme dans un ouvrage publié). Tout doit être absolument justifié.

Persuasive writing is a result of sequencing your arguments and evidence properly. Every piece of writing should drive towards a single main idea, thesis, or question to be answered. That thesis will be supported by a number of main ideas, called the "key line". Each key line item will be supported by additional ideas, each of these ideas must also be properly sequenced, and each must be supported by appropriate evidence. A smooth integration of evidence therefore becomes a side product of starting from a strong outline.

C'est pour moi ce qu'on appelle le travail de recherche. Il faut savoir exercer son esprit critique pour ne pas faire une compilation d'auteurs les uns derrière les autres.

The key to academic writing are the conclusions that the author develops. The evidence supports your conclusions, but it is the combination of the evidence you select balanced with your unique viewpoint and experience that creates something new. It all starts with an idea; the thesis of your work. The data you collect begins to prove or disprove your argument, and your analysis becomes more refined as you research and write. This is why actively seeking ideas and evidence that disprove your thesis is so important. You want to build a "steel man" argument and know both sides of the issue to the point that you KNOW your argument is the best. The alternative is a "straw man" understanding that is easily blown over.

A mix of evidence keeps things interesting. Every idea or statement in your work must have a corresponding piece of evidence to back it up. By using a diverse mix of evidence you can create a strong argument while keeping the narrative flow engaging. Let's face it, academic writing can be dry. Using a mix of hard data, verifiable stories or analogies, and other research can create a "slippery slope" that helps keep the reader engaged and moving through the entire document.

Tout dépend en fait du sujet. Un de mes étudiants, une année, nous a proposé un sujet sur lequel aucun article n'avait été publié dans des revues ni aucun livre (le sujet était trop récent pour cela). Par contre, il y avait une nombreuse littérature via les sites Web. Je lui ai donc demandé d'être exhaustif dans cette littérature pour pouvoir être le premier à publier derrière.

Des outils existent pour éviter l'inexactitude des citations. Il est toujours utile de les conseiller et de les utiliser. Cela évite les erreurs.